Media

CNN Tries Hard to Focus on the Issues, Fails

Right after wrapping up the CNN/YouTube Republican debate last night, Anderson Cooper proudly told viewers that CNN's post-game analysis was "not going to focus on the horse race. Instead, tonight, we're looking at the issues."

It was this relentless focus on the issues that produced comments like these from CNN's panelists:

John King, CNN correspondent: "Another big question, Anderson, we have been waiting and watching over the months of this campaign for the first attack ad, watching TV in Iowa, watching TV in New Hampshire. Well, the first attack ad came tonight."

 David Gergen, former White House adviser:  "Well, on style, I think that the most presidential tonight were John McCain, who has found his voice again...But the candidate I think that the spotlight was shining on tonight and who really emerged as the most authentic and human was Mike Huckabee. Huckabee continually responded to questions with a -- with a compassionate, sort of human quality that I think will appeal to a lot of people in their homes." 

Jamal Simmons, Democratic strategist: "I thought Mike Huckabee was good. I mean, he's one of these candidates that really has jumped off the page and impressed everyone up and down the field. And you see that reflected in the numbers right now...And, at the same time, you take a look at Romney, you know, his -- his hair never fell, but his voice faltered. He -- you know, on issues like abortion, gays in the military, he just seemed like, if you -- if you had style points, he just was not a commanding presence, I thought, tonight at all."  

One other observation.  CNN favorite Bill Bennett observed that Mitt Romney had performed as if he were "all in -- as you would say in Texas Hold'em."  That's a reference you'd think Mr. Bennett might want to stay away from.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

The_"debate"_was rigged (not verified) says:

Alternative media is reporting at least FOUR of the "questioners" in last night's CNN debate were KNOWN to have worked for Hillary, Obama's or Edwards campaign:

- Keith Kerr is on a Clinton campaign steering comittee.
- Concerned Young Undecided Person “Journey” has a YouTube posting linked to her profile of her wearing a
"John Edwards 08" t-shirt
- Concerned Undecided Log Cabin Republican supporter David Cercone supports Obama in his YouTube profile.
- Concerned Undecided Mom LeeAnn Anderson is an activist for the John Edwards-endorsing United Steelworkers union.

How did Alternative Media find all this out? Easy. They checked their YouTube profiles(!) So - what did CNN know and when did they know it? They need to answer the question "Why was the Debate Rigged?"

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.