Let’s Take a Break From Immigration

MORE
The National Observer
The other day The New York Times did a piece on the grass-roots opponents of the great compromise immigration bill. The accompanying photos showed a bunch of snaggletoothed retards living in trailers on the outskirts of town near the dump.
Thus the message is conveyed that if you want to identify yourself with right-thinking mainstreamers, you will be in favor of this bill. Episcopalians are, Harvard-educated reform Jews are, Roman Catholics who favor a woman’s right to choose are, so get with the respectables and let your legislator know you love this bill.
As we all know by now, the first great stumbling block is what the bill’s opponents call amnesty. They cannot stomach the thought that if enough people enter the country illegally there is not a goddamn thing you can do about it but give them and all their relatives and their relatives’ relatives citizenship. For many it is the pluperfect example of public impotence. It drives some people wild that, for whatever motive, a person can waltz into the country in violation of our laws, squat long enough and then have the cheek to declare that he has a right to citizenship.
The only answer thus far given to the snaggle people is that it is impractical to deport the estimated 12 million illegals thought to be living among us legals. The pro-legislation side adds that any attempt at mass deportations would be shameful and inhumane, all of which is undoubtedly the case.
The snaggle people know the background of all this is the previous amnesties and what has amounted to governmental indifference to the integrity of the borders on a scale so large that one wonders if the United States is able to control who comes in and what happens to them once they are in. If those who hate the bill and the amnesty which it contains are to be mollified, they need to have their trust in Washington’s will to keep its word and its competence to deliver on its promises restored.
When Washington has demonstrated that it has closed the borders, something which might, incidentally, discourage the rampant drug trade, it will be in a better position to bring forth some kind of program to legitimate the 12 million squatters or illegals or undocumenteds. Call them what you will.
The program currently included in the bill has as little a chance of succeeding as you have of finding a large farm or construction project in California or Texas that is not crawling with illegals. The program in the bill is so complicated that it might not be possible to carry it out by an effective civil service, and we, presently, are stuck with the one we saw swing into inaction when Katrina struck.
The regaining of control of the borders and the effective supervision of visa entrées is the work of five years or more. The thought of limiting immigration to a small number of highly trained workers for such a long period seems almost impossible, but it has been done before, albeit in a different era.
After the first World War, immigration to the United States was drastically cut back, and it stayed cut back for about 25 years until after World War II. You might call it the Grand Pause after the previous 45 or 50 years during which immigrants poured into the country by the millions. Next Page >
















So, those who support the rule of law and secure borders during a time of war are "snaggle people" or retards, eh?
Well, jackass, I guess more than 80 percent of the country are retards, then. According to Zogby, only 3 percent of Americans have confidence in Congress on this issue. So, I s'pose 97 percent of the country is retarded in your view.
So, on behalf of the 97 percent, I went to the trouble of registering here so I could tell you two, very simple words.
Screw you.
Jackass.
Dawg,
Check out Ace's pictures linked below to see it is the New York Times that should really be the object of your ire. (again)
SnaggleTooth Vs Shamnesty
Immigration Opponents are "snaggle people,"
The other day The New York Times did a piece on the grass-roots opponents of the great compromise immigration bill.
The accompanying photos showed a bunch of snaggletoothed retards living in trailers on the outskirts of town near the dump.
Thus the message is conveyed that if you want to identify yourself with right-thinking mainstreamers, you will be in favor of this bill.
Amusingly (and ironically -- mostly), Von Hoffman writes about the article referring to immigration opponents as "snaggle people," lampooning the NYT's editorial position.
jdawg5711: Read it carefully. It's actually damn good sarcasm, and on your/our side.
I think sometimes the writers need to end their columns with (sarcasm) or something, because skimming it, we often miss it.
So Catholics who defy their Church's ruling on child-murder (abortion) are part of the 'respectables'? I would say they are confused hypocrites, apart from their main fault, which is that they are murderers. What kind of an idiot belongs to a church only to defy its rulings? Anyone with integrity and the ability to think would either abide by the teaching, or leave. Why live in a contradictory situation?
But then that has always been the problem with Liberals: they have difficulty in sticking to a principle. Why do they believe that "...if enough people enter the country illegally there is not a goddamn thing you can do about it..."? That is just an assumption that is based on the Liberal view that anything even remotely forceful is out of bounds. Well, Pinko's, that is just your view. There are lots of us that acknowledge our right to respond to law-breakers at least as firmly as they acted in breaking the law.
There is plenty we can do to get rid of the invaders. For a start, they got here on their own, so send them back that way. How? Round them up and march them back under guard. No-one OWES them a ride. That is just a Liberal assumption, and one that encourages them to just keep on coming back time after time. March them over the border from wherever they are in the US, and see the number of returnees drop - pardon the pun.
Inhumane? So if you get back from vacation, and someone has moved into your house illegally, it is inhumane to boot them out?
Hell, the more I think of it, the more I like it. Since the Liberals feel so stongly about this, how about they go along for the walk? Maybe carry some bags for the expelled aliens.
Yep, I'm just a happy old snaggle-tooth. Masters Degree, Managing Director then Chairman of my Company, but hey, some Liberal says if I don't let a lot of illegal aliens walk all over me and my rights, all of that counts for nothing - I MUST be a snaggle-tooth in a trailer park. Well, Board Meetings are gonna be cramped, but I'll just have to get me a trailer and learn to manage. I mean, how can I presume to know more than one of my Liberal betters?