Politics

Obama Tour Lands in L.A.

Getty Images

Fresh from a weekend of Oprah Winfrey-related hysteria, Barack Obama took to the West Coast last night for a Los Angeles fundraising rally.

The event, held in the Gibson Amphitheatre amid the garish neon of Universal City, was aimed at a youthful audience, with student tickets available for $25 and the rock band The Goo Goo Dolls being the main attraction, Mr. Obama aside. Organizers estimated attendance at around 5,000.

Mr. Obama departed from his standard stump speech several times during a 37-minute address.

After saying, “It’s not just our military that makes us a great nation”, Mr. Obama described a specific presidential aspiration:

“See, I want to go before the United Nations. As president of the United States, I want to go before that General Assembly and say, America is back. We are ready to lead again.

“We are ready to lead again by building schools around the world to teach math and science instead of hatred of America. We are going to lead by tackling HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa, because it’s the right thing to do. We are going to lead by bringing an end to the genocide in Darfur because we are not a nation that turns a blind eye to slaughter.”

Those sentiments earned Mr. Obama one of several standing ovations.

On a very different note, Mr. Obama poked fun once again at the now-infamous decision by Hillary Clinton’s campaign to cite a kindergarten essay he allegedly wrote as evidence of his long-held presidential plans.

“I know that some of my opponents have been rifling through my kindergarten papers. I am going to be releasing those papers tomorrow,” Mr. Obama said to laughter.

“There is some scandalous stuff in there. I experimented with coloring outside the lines when I was in kindergarten. Pulled on a girl’s ponytail once—and liked it.”

For all the jokes, Mr. Obama faces an uphill fight in California. Although recent data on voter intentions is limited, a December 4 poll by Survey USA gave Mrs. Clinton a commanding 50 per cent to 24 per cent lead over the Illinois senator in the state.

Last night, the campaign tried at least one novel tactic to redress the balance. Buffy Wicks, Mr. Obama’s state field director, coordinated the distribution of lists of names and phone numbers to the crowd. From the stage, Ms. Wicks then encouraged each audience member to call four of the numbers on the list to make a scripted pitch on Mr. Obama’s behalf and try to enlist new volunteers.

As Ms. Wicks noted, this should have produced around 20,000 calls. Judging from reactions that could be overheard in the vicinity of the Observer, however, the success rate, as with most phone banks, was not especially high. Several calls seemed to be terminated abruptly by the person on the other end of the line.

Given the setting, it was no surprise that a number of figures from the entertainment world popped up to offer testimonies on Mr. Obama’s behalf.

While the advanced publicity for the event referred to Scarlett Johansson, Jessica Biel, Will.I.Am and Anthony Kiedis of the Red Hot Chili Peppers as among the attendees, inviting ticket-buyers to “join them” at the event, none of those people appeared on stage, and it was not clear if they were there.

Rapper Nick Cannon MC-ed proceedings, which also featured a musical performance from R&B star Ne-Yo

Other speakers including veteran actor James Whitmore (The Shawshank Redemption) and TV personality Giselle Fernandez lacked real star power. Mr. Whitmore, who kept his remarks brief and eloquent, received a more enthusiastic reception than Ms. Fernandez, whose address incorporated a lengthy paraphrasing of Mr. Obama’s 2004 speech to the Democratic National Convention.

As for Mr. Obama himself, he paid tribute to House and 24 actor Kal Penn, who also addressed the crowd. Mr. Penn, the candidate noted, had become a regular volunteer for the Obama campaign in Iowa.

“Kal’s not fooling around,” Mr. Obama said cheerfully. “Kal’s in the office in the morning eating pizza next to the staff making phone calls. The guy’s an animal.”

On serious issues, Mr. Obama offered a lengthier criticism of the No Child Left Behind Act than he normally does, complaining, “I don’t like the thinking that, just by imposing standardized tests so teachers can no longer teach art or music or social studies, that somehow we’re fixing our school system.”

The climax of Mr. Obama’s stump speech customarily refers to people “standing up” to change America, in reference both to the civil rights movement and to the need for political courage in general.

Last night, Mr. Obama expanded on the theme, celebrating those who “stood up so women could have the right to vote. They stood up so unions had the right to organize. They stood up so that African Americans could be part of a more perfect union.

“They stood up to fire hoses,” he continued. “They stood up to dogs. They stood up to jails. They stood up so that the American dream could live for those who hunger for opportunity, for those who thirst for justice.”

Kathleen Abrahams, an elementary school office manager from Sylmar, Calif, said she had once been a supporter of Hillary Clinton but was now in Mr. Obama’s camp.

“Our country is still so divided over race,” Ms. Abrahams, who is white, said. “I feel like he is the one person who could pull it together at last. I mean, it’s a long time since Abraham Lincoln.”

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Teacher (not verified) says:

I attended the event last night and your article it bears little resemblance to essence of Senator Obama's speech. Portions of his speech were quoted out of context, which totally changed the original intent. The Senator speaks of change and he was humorous, intelligent and he illuminated all aspects of our current government that are in dire need of resurrection. I would like to comment on your quote, “It’s not just our military that makes us a great nation.” Senator Obama was referencing America's misuse of power in the world and his desire to restore America's image in the world by using the power of the tongue, not just that of a rifle. I am gravely disappointed in your portrayal of the event and I walked away from the event feeling that there IS hope in this world, that the government will finally be restored and Obama is the first glimpse of HOPE that I have felt in many years of disappointment. He is bright, funny, thoughtful, and we would all be fortunate to have such a man in our oval office.

Niall Stanage (not verified) says:

Hi "Teacher":
I don't generally respond to comments about articles I have written if the poster is simply expressing a different opinion, but you seem to contest the accuracy of what I wrote, which I find puzzling.
You complain that "portions of his speech were quoted out of context, which totally changed the original intent." The only example of this that you offer is his remark about the military. But the way I have reported that comment, and those that followed it, does not seem to be at odds with the meaning you yourself ascribe to them. And, indeed, I note that this passage of the speech "earned Mr. Obama one of several standing ovations", which is hardly evidence of the anti-Obama bias you seem to be suggesting.
You don't offer specifics about problems you have with the rest of the quotes, so I presume you accept their accuracy.
Thanks for reading the article in the first place, though.
Niall

Troydm (not verified) says:

what the hell does Obama mean when he says he will be an agent for CHANGE.

Very airy fairy nonsense.

John G. (not verified) says:

The Teacher seems to be saying that your piece doesn't accurately reflect the spirit of the event.

I read your article and WOULD have walked away thinking the event was a flop and the campaign created what could be the largest bank of nuisance calls on the continent. It seemed to me that 5000 people showed up and were mostly disinterested and dissatisfied because of the "B" list celebrities present and so-so artists performing.

You're either disillusioned with the race, intentionally writing an anti-Obama slant, or you're just a poor writer. You choose.

Something tells me the Teacher did the event better justice in one paragraph than you did with all the space you had.

And please resist the urge to comment on your own article - it really makes you look pathetic.

undecided (not verified) says:

John G. and Teacher,
As a wholly uninterested third party who is still trying to make up my mind as to whom to vote for, I found this piece very informative and actually one that puts Obama's quotes in a favorable context. For example, I knew exactly what Obama meant when he spoke of using not just the military. As an organizer, I appreciate the use of volunteers calling their own friends and contacts to reach out for Obama (although I don't know how "novel" it is, but that is a different issue). I think the tongue in cheek attitude of many of the comments came across well and showed Obama is capable of making intellectual comments in a way that does not bore people to death, brings them back in. And he is complementary to volunteers (ok, big star volunteers, but volunteers none the less). The fact that those stars are not big enough names for you John G. is no fault of the reporter, Steven Spielberg is taken by the other side though.

Teacher (not verified) says:

Thank you for your reply. I read the article again to check my feelings and my original comments still stand. The event was amazing and the article does not reflect the impact it had on the audience.

Hello Undecided!

THE SENATOR, Barack Obama appears to be standing in front of "A MESSAGE"

THE CAMPAIGN, appears to have provided (4) contacts for every person present...

THAT TRANSLATES...

You are not alone, talk about it, network, get feed-back, "Be Intelligent", VOTE!

"THERE IS A CHOICE"

No More Division (not verified) says:

Amazing to me that we Democrats have complained for the last 7 years, among other things, of the division created by the Bushecons. Putting the "reasons" of the divide aside, we all can agree that the divide in itself, was largely to blame for some of the issues we are facing today.
With that said, why would we as Democrats choose the most polarizing figure in our field as our Nominee? Is this going to be a "you screwed us, now we're screwing you" kind of nominee? Because thats what Hillary being our nominee would be. Another 4 years of divide.
We want to walk into office in Jan. 09 with a political divide ALREADY IN PLACE? Ask yourselves, is thats what best for AMERICA?
I believe the type of divide created by the Clinton administration was not good for AMERICA. I didnt personally care about his affair, but that divide hurt US as a country. When casting your vote, place the needs of this country first.

T.Light (not verified) says:

I was very thankful to read the article, because I wasn't in attendance. However, I was really excited to hear the feedback from the teacher and John G.- I feel, I agree where they are coming from. The article did appear as if the event was a flop, or just not satisfactory to the writer and/or audience. I have personally attended fund-raisers for Obama in the past and I was very impressed by how innovative he was and how clear his vision for change is. It would have been nice to learn more about the issues that were addressed and the impact of his message, over the lack of celebrity appearances. I would guess after the event no one cared about which star didn't address the audience, but rather the overall message, and as a reader, I expected to learn more.

Do what feels good (not verified) says:

I do not think it your conclusion that his statement is 'nonsensical' is correct. What Senator Obama is implying by he will be "an agent for change" is simply that he wants to bring change. The word 'agent' here simply means a person or human. By 'for' he is expressing that he aligns himself with the proposition of 'change'. Therefore, Senator Obama's statement is not nonsensical, rather, it has meaning.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.