The Real Star of the G.O.P. Primary: Hillary
The most influential noncandidate in the Republican presidential primary is not Pat Robertson, Paul Weyrich or any other supposed kingmaker.
It is Hillary Clinton.
She has been a star of the G.O.P story line so far, standing as a reference point for the primary field and recurring theme in the rhetoric of the leading candidates.
Mr. Giuliani’s success in maintaining his front-runner status this fall has been in no small part due to his ability to seize on and magnify Mrs. Clinton’s missteps and turn them into media events.
Whether leaping on her refusal to condemn MoveOn.org’s General Petraeus ad, or creating an online mock-up of her “Baby Bond,” or chastising her for hedging on driver’s licenses for illegal aliens, Mr. Giuliani has jumped at the chance to portray his potential general election opponent as out of touch and unfit for the presidency. His response to a debate moderator who asked him whether he was sufficiently different from Mrs. Clinton on policy issues was a succinct “you gotta be kidding.”
His use of Mrs. Clinton as a foil has delighted the conservative base. It has also allowed him to argue that even if they disagree with some of his policy positions, they should not doubt his willingness to take on their most loathed foe.
Mr. McCain’s recent comeback, meanwhile, has been greatly aided by a debate moment in which he lampooned Mrs. Clinton’s legislative earmark for a Woodstock museum. He parlayed his jibe into campaign ads and a wholesale indictment of the 1960’s counterculture (which still drives conservatives to distraction). Having fun at her expense has a serious purpose for Mr. McCain, establishing him on common ground—and with a common enemy—with conservative primary voters.
Mrs. Clinton has had an impact on the Thompson campaign too, but it has largely been a negative one. In the context of a looming matchup with Mrs. Clinton, Fred Thompson’s candidacy has looked that much more alarming to conservatives looking for a nominee who can actually stop her.
Does he have the energy and the verbal arsenal to go toe-to-toe with the formidable Clinton campaign? His dropping poll numbers indicate that primary voters think not.
But it has become necessary for each of the would-be Republican nominees to set themselves up in contrast to the former first lady. In the wake of Mrs. Clinton’s convoluted performance in the most recent Democratic debate, for example, the Republican candidates were just as quick as her actual primary opponents to seize on her waffling.
And Mr. Giuliani and, more recently, Mitt Romney have each taken to criticizing Mrs. Clinton’s lack of business and administrative experience to bolster their own credentials. Mr. Giuliani reminds voters that Clinton hasn’t has had responsibility for the “safety of others”; Mr. Romney mocks her for never having managed so much as a corner store.
It’s not overstating things to say that even before she has won her own party’s nomination, Mrs. Clinton is reshaping what G.O.P. voters are looking for in their candidate. The result is that the current Republican primary contest is being steered away from usual considerations of ideology and conservative bona fides, and more towards a single, pragmatic question: Who can beat Hillary Clinton?
HILLARY THE LEFTIST PUPPET CANDIDATE
Lacking for a strong real candidate, the dominant Leftist Democrats have run Hillary. The problem is that she has long been observed to be emotionally and intellectually deficient.
Their clever solution is to systematically change her image; under the assumption that the American People are for the most part too simple minded to know the difference between realities and illusions.
To make the Hillary-puppet appear to be compassionate, meticulous studies are made of the social and economic needs of various social and economic goups, such as homosexuals and low income elderly voters. To see who does the research for the emotional Hillary-puppet displays, Google: Mark Penn.
To make the Hillary-puppet appear to be mentally superior, questions must be planted and answers must be rigorously rehearsed. To see who does the research for these brilliant questions and answers, Google: Mark Penn.
The fatal flaw is that the small group of Leftist Democratic masterminds behind this Hillary-puppet Show is just not quite clever enough to successfully pull off their scam. Moral depravity and intellectual bankruptcy are their self-limiting handicaps.
The World is closely watching the American Cultural War; Google: Who Would the World Elect.
Subject: Is this the Flip Flop Experience Hillary is claiming to have ???? We need Free and fair trade not a Lobbyist pressured trade agreement , which hillary says she takes Lobbists money so how will we see Trade policy wrote in the future ???
News Clippings 3/30/2007
Bloomberg
Clinton Breaks With Husband's Legacy on Nafta Pact, China Trade
by: Kristin Jensen & Mark Drajem
One of President Bill Clinton's enduring legacies was his hard-fought push for trade deals with Mexico and China. His wife is heading in another direction.
Senator Hillary Clinton, the front-runner for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination, wonders why the North American Free Trade Agreement is ``continuing to drive hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people from Mexico into our country,' she said in an interview. ``We just can't keep doing what we did in the 20th century.'
Somewhere along the Clintons' ``bridge to the 21st century' -- their 1996 campaign mantra -- they parted ways on trade. Bill was a champion of the global economy and prodded Congress to approve Nafta in 1993 and China's entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001. Hillary, 59, says new deals may need to be put on hold pending a review -- an idea she calls ``a little timeout.'
Comments like that align her with union members and anti- globalization activists who say U.S. jobs are being sacrificed in the name of free trade. Clinton has expanded her circle of advisers beyond pro-trade associates such as former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, 68, and Deputy Secretary Roger Altman, 60, her top economic adviser, to include AFL-CIO officials and other free-trade critics.
`A Careful Line'
On the stump, she's more skeptical about globalization's benefits than her husband was. She ``is walking a careful line,' said Jeff Faux, who supports the idea of a pause in trade deals and is the founding president of the Economic Policy Institute, a labor-affiliated research group in Washington. ``There's a difference between Hillary and Bill on this.'
A moratorium on trade agreements -- which would be used to beef up labor and environmental protections and provide more aid for domestic workers displaced by foreign competition -- is backed by labor leaders and some economists, who call it a ``strategic pause.'
The idea was rejected by Altman and Rubin as detrimental to the American economy at a forum in Washington last year. They didn't return telephone messages left at their offices.
Clinton's positioning on trade reflects the changing nature of the debate in the U.S., which increasingly focuses on concerns over outsourcing and the shift of jobs to other nations such as China and India rather than on the benefits of tariff reductions.
Grassroots Sentiment
It also -- as with Republicans grappling over illegal immigration -- demonstrates the extent to which grassroots sentiment can alter candidates' platforms.
A Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll conducted in January found 39 percent of Democrats believe free trade hurts the economy; only 18 percent say it is a benefit.
Both parties agree that a backlash on trade helped Democrats in the 2006 elections. West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller, a Democrat, said U.S. workers have been ``so decimated' by unfettered competition that ``I think the American people understand they will be hit by it.'
Clinton promoted her husband's trade agenda for years, and friends say that she's a free-trader at heart. ``The simple fact is, nations with free-market systems do better,' she said in a 1997 speech to the Corporate Council on Africa. ``Look around the globe: Those nations which have lowered trade barriers are prospering more than those that have not.'
Praise for Nafta
At the 1998 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, she praised corporations for mounting ``a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of Nafta.' She added: ``It is certainly clear that we have not by any means finished the job that has begun.'
Clinton ``is committed to free trade and to the growing role of the international economy,' said Steven Rattner, a Clinton fundraiser and co-founder of Quadrangle Group LLC, a New York buyout firm. ``She would absolutely do the right thing as president.'
There was little evidence of a protectionist tilt to Clinton's trade views during either her 2000 campaign or first years in the Senate. She stressed issues such as homeland security and children's health care, and wasn't a major voice in trade-policy debates.
As she began to gear up for a White House run, Clinton became less of a free-trade booster and more skeptical about the payoff of globalization.
Opposing Cafta
She voted against the Central American Free Trade Agreement in 2005, saying the pact lacked strong protections for foreign workers and that President George W. Bush was failing to enforce existing trade laws.
She also joined her New York colleague, Senator Charles Schumer, in backing legislation imposing trade sanctions on Chinese exports unless the government in Beijing agreed to stop holding down the value of the yuan. Last month, she sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke warning about China's ownership of $350 billion of U.S. debt.
Clinton called on Paulson to adopt a proposal requiring a ``plan of action' to reduce U.S. deficits when foreign-owned debt exceeds 25 percent of gross domestic product or the trade deficit reaches 5 percent of GDP.
In 2006, Clinton helped lead efforts to condemn the purchase of U.S. port facilities by DP World, a company based in Dubai, in the United Arab Emirates. At the same time, her husband was offering advice to Dubai's leaders, the Financial Times reported.
To help allay suspicions that she's been hijacked by free- traders from her husband's team, Clinton asked Thea Lee, the AFL- CIO's policy director, and Michael Wessel, who had been a top aide of Nafta foe and former House Democratic leader Richard Gephardt, into strategy discussions to debate pro-traders.
Negotiated by Bush
In her interview with Bloomberg, Clinton was careful to describe Nafta as having been negotiated by the administration of President George H.W. Bush ``and then pushed through Congress in the Clinton administration.'
Labor leaders, upset about job losses they blame on Nafta, remain suspicious that she is too influenced by Rubin, the vice chairman of Citigroup Inc. and an outspoken foe of protectionism.
``The Rubin wing of the Democratic Party is heading up policy direction' for the Clinton campaign, said Leo Gerard, president of the United Steelworkers. That's ``going to be an issue' with union members, he said. ``We don't need more of the same.'
Clinton supporters such as Rattner, 54, say she's trying to address the underside of globalization as more U.S. jobs move offshore. ``We all have to be sensitive to the fact that there is collateral damage,' he said.