Republican Congressman: Hillary Would Be "Effective President"
Here's a partial transcript of Republican congressman Peter King's television interview yesterday with WNBC-TV's Jay DeDapper, in which King had some pretty nice things to say about a New Yorker running for President not named Rudy Giuliani.
I am not one of these Republicans who hates Hillary Clinton. I disagree with her, but I think she would be an effective president. But I do think that Giuliani can beat her. Maybe not--New York will be tough. But New Jersey, for instance. I think he has a very good chance. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida. That's where the key race is going to be. It'll be an excellent race.
Yes, King is personally friendly with the Clintons, and yes, he's never exactly been one of those Republicans who feels compelled to stay on message. But still.
Also on the show was Anthony Weiner, who had this to say about Michael Bloomberg's presidential ambitions: “If it walks like a campaign and quacks like a campaign, at a certain point you have to assume it’s a campaign.”

















I just want to know why these two women are running for President. One has a lisp, wears a blond wig and a pink dress with a boa, and the other has real hair, I think.
Both are kind of megalomaniacs.
Why would I want to vote for a guy who's law firm represents the Spanish company which will be building the so called NAFTA Superhighway? Texas Corridor, whatever. He thinks Bush is great and the terrorists are just America haters for no reason. That's not a very deep thinker. But he's getting filthy rich off of the 9/11 stories he can tell. Why doesn't he tell the one about who told him that the WTC7 was going to implode. It wasn't hit by a plane.
Why would I want to vote for a woman that is married to a man that disrespected the military and the Oval Office when he was President, and was impeached? Why would I want him to be an Ambassador for my country? He wants to be Secretary General of the UN. Why doesn't she go for that job too?
I Digg Ron Paul.