Romney's Religion Speech

In case you missed it, Mitt Romney delivered his widely-anticipated religion speech this morning. His main message seemed to be that as president he would, "serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause."
"Thank you, Mr. President, for your kind introduction.
"It is an honor to be here today. This is an inspiring place because of you and the First Lady and because of the film exhibited across the way in the Presidential library. For those who have not seen it, it shows the President as a young pilot, shot down during the Second World War, being rescued from his life-raft by the crew of an American submarine. It is a moving reminder that when America has faced challenge and peril, Americans rise to the occasion, willing to risk their very lives to defend freedom and preserve our nation. We are in your debt. Thank you, Mr. President.
"Mr. President, your generation rose to the occasion, first to defeat Fascism and then to vanquish the Soviet Union. You left us, your children, a free and strong America. It is why we call yours the greatest generation. It is now my generation's turn. How we respond to today's challenges will define our generation. And it will determine what kind of America we will leave our children, and theirs.
"America faces a new generation of challenges. Radical violent Islam seeks to destroy us. An emerging China endeavors to surpass our economic leadership. And we are troubled at home by government overspending, overuse of foreign oil, and the breakdown of the family.
"Over the last year, we have embarked on a national debate on how best to preserve American leadership. Today, I wish to address a topic which I believe is fundamental to America's greatness: our religious liberty. I will also offer perspectives on how my own faith would inform my Presidency, if I were elected.
"There are some who may feel that religion is not a matter to be seriously considered in the context of the weighty threats that face us. If so, they are at odds with the nation's founders, for they, when our nation faced its greatest peril, sought the blessings of the Creator. And further, they discovered the essential connection between the survival of a free land and the protection of religious freedom. In John Adams’ words: 'We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our constitution was made for a moral and religious people.'
"Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. Freedom opens the windows of the soul so that man can discover his most profound beliefs and commune with God. Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.
"Given our grand tradition of religious tolerance and liberty, some wonder whether there are any questions regarding an aspiring candidate's religion that are appropriate. I believe there are. And I will answer them today.
"Almost 50 years ago another candidate from Massachusetts explained that he was an American running for president, not a Catholic running for president. Like him, I am an American running for president. I do not define my candidacy by my religion. A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith.
"Let me assure you that no authorities of my church, or of any other church for that matter, will ever exert influence on presidential decisions. Their authority is theirs, within the province of church affairs, and it ends where the affairs of the nation begin.
"As governor, I tried to do the right as best I knew it, serving the law and answering to the Constitution. I did not confuse the particular teachings of my church with the obligations of the office and of the Constitution – and of course, I would not do so as President. I will put no doctrine of any church above the plain duties of the office and the sovereign authority of the law.
"As a young man, Lincoln described what he called America's 'political religion' – the commitment to defend the rule of law and the Constitution. When I place my hand on the Bible and take the oath of office, that oath becomes my highest promise to God. If I am fortunate to become your president, I will serve no one religion, no one group, no one cause, and no one interest. A President must serve only the common cause of the people of the United States.
"There are some for whom these commitments are not enough. They would prefer it if I would simply distance myself from my religion, say that it is more a tradition than my personal conviction, or disavow one or another of its precepts. That I will not do. I believe in my Mormon faith and I endeavor to live by it. My faith is the faith of my fathers – I will be true to them and to my beliefs.
"Some believe that such a confession of my faith will sink my candidacy. If they are right, so be it. But I think they underestimate the American people. Americans do not respect believers of convenience.
Americans tire of those who would jettison their beliefs, even to gain the world.
"There is one fundamental question about which I often am asked. What do I believe about Jesus Christ? I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind. My church's beliefs about Christ may not all be the same as those of other faiths. Each religion has its own unique doctrines and history. These are not bases for criticism but rather a test of our tolerance. Religious tolerance would be a shallow principle indeed if it were reserved only for faiths with which we agree.
"There are some who would have a presidential candidate describe and explain his church's distinctive doctrines. To do so would enable the very religious test the founders prohibited in the Constitution. No candidate should become the spokesman for his faith. For if he becomes President he will need the prayers of the people of all faiths.
"I believe that every faith I have encountered draws its adherents closer to God. And in every faith I have come to know, there are features I wish were in my own: I love the profound ceremony of the Catholic Mass, the approachability of God in the prayers of the Evangelicals, the tenderness of spirit among the Pentecostals, the confident independence of the Lutherans, the ancient traditions of the Jews, unchanged through the ages, and the commitment to frequent prayer of the Muslims. As I travel across the country and see our towns and cities, I am always moved by the many houses of worship with their steeples, all pointing to heaven, reminding us of the source of life's blessings.
"It is important to recognize that while differences in theology exist between the churches in America, we share a common creed of moral convictions. And where the affairs of our nation are concerned, it's usually a sound rule to focus on the latter – on the great moral principles that urge us all on a common course. Whether it was the cause of abolition, or civil rights, or the right to life itself, no movement of conscience can succeed in America that cannot speak to the convictions of religious people.
"We separate church and state affairs in this country, and for good reason. No religion should dictate to the state nor should the state interfere with the free practice of religion. But in recent years, the notion of the separation of church and state has been taken by some well beyond its original meaning. They seek to remove from the public domain any acknowledgment of God. Religion is seen as merely a private affair with no place in public life. It is as if they are intent on establishing a new religion in America – the religion of secularism. They are wrong.
"The founders proscribed the establishment of a state religion, but they did not countenance the elimination of religion from the public square. We are a nation 'Under God' and in God, we do indeed trust.
"We should acknowledge the Creator as did the Founders – in ceremony and word. He should remain on our currency, in our pledge, in the teaching of our history, and during the holiday season, nativity scenes and menorahs should be welcome in our public places. Our greatness would not long endure without judges who respect the foundation of faith upon which our constitution rests. I will take care to separate the affairs of government from any religion, but I will not separate us from 'the God who gave us liberty.'
"Nor would I separate us from our religious heritage. Perhaps the most important question to ask a person of faith who seeks a political office, is this: does he share these American values: the equality of human kind, the obligation to serve one another, and a steadfast commitment to liberty?
"They are not unique to any one denomination. They belong to the great moral inheritance we hold in common. They are the firm ground on which Americans of different faiths meet and stand as a nation, united.
"We believe that every single human being is a child of God – we are all part of the human family. The conviction of the inherent and inalienable worth of every life is still the most revolutionary political proposition ever advanced. John Adams put it that we are 'thrown into the world all equal and alike.'
"The consequence of our common humanity is our responsibility to one another, to our fellow Americans foremost, but also to every child of God. It is an obligation which is fulfilled by Americans every day, here and across the globe, without regard to creed or race or nationality.
"Americans acknowledge that liberty is a gift of God, not an indulgence of government. No people in the history of the world have sacrificed as much for liberty. The lives of hundreds of thousands of America's sons and daughters were laid down during the last century to preserve freedom, for us and for freedom loving people throughout the world. America took nothing from that Century's terrible wars – no land from Germany or Japan or Korea; no treasure; no oath of fealty. America's resolve in the defense of liberty has been tested time and again. It has not been found wanting, nor must it ever be. America must never falter in holding high the banner of freedom.
"These American values, this great moral heritage, is shared and lived in my religion as it is in yours. I was taught in my home to honor God and love my neighbor. I saw my father march with Martin Luther King. I saw my parents provide compassionate care to others, in personal ways to people nearby, and in just as consequential ways in leading national volunteer movements. I am moved by the Lord's words: 'For I was an hungered, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: naked, and ye clothed me...'
"My faith is grounded on these truths. You can witness them in Ann and my marriage and in our family. We are a long way from perfect and we have surely stumbled along the way, but our aspirations, our values, are the self-same as those from the other faiths that stand upon this common foundation. And these convictions will indeed inform my presidency.
"Today's generations of Americans have always known religious liberty. Perhaps we forget the long and arduous path our nation's forbearers took to achieve it. They came here from England to seek freedom of religion. But upon finding it for themselves, they at first denied it to others. Because of their diverse beliefs, Ann Hutchinson was exiled from Massachusetts Bay, a banished Roger Williams founded Rhode Island, and two centuries later, Brigham Young set out for the West. Americans were unable to accommodate their commitment to their own faith with an appreciation for the convictions of others to different faiths. In this, they were very much like those of the European nations they had left.
"It was in Philadelphia that our founding fathers defined a revolutionary vision of liberty, grounded on self evident truths about the equality of all, and the inalienable rights with which each is endowed by his Creator.
"We cherish these sacred rights, and secure them in our Constitutional order. Foremost do we protect religious liberty, not as a matter of policy but as a matter of right. There will be no established church, and we are guaranteed the free exercise of our religion.
"I'm not sure that we fully appreciate the profound implications of our tradition of religious liberty. I have visited many of the magnificent cathedrals in Europe. They are so inspired … so grand … so empty. Raised up over generations, long ago, so many of the cathedrals now stand as the postcard backdrop to societies just too busy or too 'enlightened' to venture inside and kneel in prayer. The establishment of state religions in Europe did no favor to Europe's churches. And though you will find many people of strong faith there, the churches themselves seem to be withering away.
"Infinitely worse is the other extreme, the creed of conversion by conquest: violent Jihad, murder as martyrdom... killing Christians, Jews, and Muslims with equal indifference. These radical Islamists do their preaching not by reason or example, but in the coercion of minds and the shedding of blood. We face no greater danger today than theocratic tyranny, and the boundless suffering these states and groups could inflict if given the chance.
"The diversity of our cultural expression, and the vibrancy of our religious dialogue, has kept America in the forefront of civilized nations even as others regard religious freedom as something to be destroyed.
"In such a world, we can be deeply thankful that we live in a land where reason and religion are friends and allies in the cause of liberty, joined against the evils and dangers of the day. And you can be certain of this: Any believer in religious freedom, any person who has knelt in prayer to the Almighty, has a friend and ally in me. And so it is for hundreds of millions of our countrymen: we do not insist on a single strain of religion – rather, we welcome our nation's symphony of faith.
"Recall the early days of the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia, during the fall of 1774. With Boston occupied by British troops, there were rumors of imminent hostilities and fears of an impending war. In this time of peril, someone suggested that they pray. But there were objections. 'They were too divided in religious sentiments', what with Episcopalians and Quakers, Anabaptists and Congregationalists, Presbyterians and Catholics.
"Then Sam Adams rose, and said he would hear a prayer from anyone of piety and good character, as long as they were a patriot.
"And so together they prayed, and together they fought, and together, by the grace of God ... they founded this great nation.
"In that spirit, let us give thanks to the divine 'author of liberty.' And together, let us pray that this land may always be blessed, 'with freedom's holy light.'
"God bless the United States of America."


















Great points, love of God and love of freedom are a great foundation for a united country. Our differences are the main things we have in common; moreover, acceptance of others and their beliefs bind us as was intended into the United States. United in liberty, freedom, and justice, one nation under God.
Best Regards
Carol
One of the best speeches I've ever heard. Gov. Romney showed great insight and looked very presidential.
A sincere speech. But the following quotes concern me.
"Americans acknowledge that liberty is a gift of God
Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom
It is as if they are intent on establishing a new religion in America – the religion of secularism. They are wrong"
In these he seemingly tries to speak for ALL Americans. Simply because these are his personal views does not at all mean they are the views of every American. Indeed they are not. The fact that he makes this error in such a major speech is cause for concern.
That's just the point. This country that you live in was founded on the principle that freedom is granted to each human being from the Creator (God). If you don't agree with that than you are, simply put, un-American. If you don't have a belief in a Creator than you should thank your lucky stars that you live here and not in, let's say, Iran where they would cut your head off for your statements. Also, if you don't believe that there is and has been a movement to secularize this nation than you simply haven't been paying attention. Please read the Declaration of Independance and Constitution and familirize yourself with the country within which you reside and you may realize that Mitt Romney was simply stating the principles of America and was speaking for all Americans.
For the many who object to Romney because they believe he is inconsistent, unreliable, and untrustworthy, this speech where he failed to mention the name of his own faith more than once will not change their political position. It will only reinforce their conclusions.
For people who value men’s souls more than their votes the Romney speech also proved their point.
Some of the smartest folks out there do not understand the religious objection to Romney. The objection is very basic. Electing a Mormon President will cause more people to become Mormon, causing them to go to hell. The Presidency will provide an opportunity for the marketing machine that is the Mormon Church to succeed in a way it has not before. Mitt Romney is handsome and articulate. He is wealthy and successful. He presents an image of comfort that many wish to obtain. His Mormon faith is being shown has a central component to all those things. If elected President he will cause many to be deceived.
To call that opinion bigotry or idiocy is simplistic and inaccurate.
The people who believe that have NO animus against Mormons. They would happily break bread with them. They would cross the street to care for their needs. Many of them pray for them. Some of the most ardent opponents for this reason were raised in Mormon homes. Believing that Islam and Mormonism are false off-shots of Christianity is not bigotry; it is an accurate belief for believers in Christ.
Comments made by Lew are accurate and quite perceptive. In addition to that there are barriers to Christians accepting a Mormon president. They include the fact that Mormons believe that only Mormons will go to heaven (that's why there is baptism for the dead. Mormons also believe that they are the only true church and the only church with God's priesthood. And then there is the famous Joseph Smith story about God telling Joseph to create his church because Christian church's "draw near to me with their lips while their hearts are far from me and mine anger is kindling against the inhabitants of the earth.”
Romney will say anything to get elected
I think you are confused, Lew. People do not go to Hell for worshiping God. They go to Hell for persecuting people who worship God. A true Christian does not judge or condemn others for the way in which they worship. They are grateful that there are more God-fearing people among us. His religion is not up for debate here. You missed the whole purpose of his speech. I also find it quite offensive that you would suggest that the American people are so shallow minded that they would enter a religious faith based on how attractive or articulate someone may be. As a Christian woman, I respect your right to your beliefs and it pains me to see a fellow "Christian" being so unChristlike as to make such harsh and ignorant statements.
You all are missing the point completely. Romney is utterly confused as to what the Constitution states and what the founding fathers thought. They were Deists, hardly Christian.
James Madison:
"Ecclesiastical establishments tend to great ignorance and corruption, all of which facilitate the execution of mischievous projects."
Thomas Jefferson:
"History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."
Benjamin Franklin:
"I cannot conceive otherwise than that He, the Infinite Father, expects or requires no worship or praise from us, but that He is even infinitely above it."
"As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the System of Morals and his Religion, as he left them to us, the best the World ever saw or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most the present Dissenters in England, some Doubts as to his Divinity"
John Adams:
"As I understand the Christian religion, it was, and is, a revelation. But how has it happened that millions of fables, tales, legends, have been blended with both Jewish and Christian revelation that have made them the most bloody religion that ever existed?"
Romney thinks religion is inseparable from freedom. He is wrong. Religious freedom is inseparable from freedom. It's ridiculous to say you can't be free without religion, just as it would be ridiculous to say you can't be free with it.
that is the stupidist thing I have ever heard. cause more people to go to hell??? now that is simplistic in your thinking. when have other presidents ever pulled the american people to join their religions? And how come it doesn't matter what religion any of the other candidates are? I can't help but feel bad for you and whoever helped to sway your opinion... very Christlike I must say... oh wait, no it isn't!
I think it only fair to those of you who are not familiar with the tenants of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) to clarify that Mormons don't believe that "only Mormons will go to heaven." It's sad the writer above feels such hatred towards his/her former religion that he/she would have to misrepresent its tenants.
IF I vote for Mit Romney, it will not because of his religion, which, by the way is Christian (by definition, Mormonism is a "denomination," of Christianity, NOT a religion).
I've yet to vote (or not vote) for a single candidate at ANY level based on the church they attend. I've voted for more than a few candidates whose religious views differ from mine--some only slightly, but many significantly.
I HAVE always looked for a person who is true to his/her convictions and values, as well as a person who's values (not their theology) were values I could support.
EVERY candidate running for office has a clear trail for the voter to determine their convictions and values and leadership ability. If you like what Mr Romney has accomplished so far in both public and private pursuits, and you believe his experience in those pursuits would qualify him for the presidency, then WHY in the WORLD would you vote against him? Other than the OBVIOUS fact that his good looks will cause millions of Americans to join the Mormon Church--just like Kennedy's great looks so dramatically increased conversions to Catholicism (brilliant deduction Lew!).
I’m growing weary of people saying that because Mit Romney doesn’t believe in their interpretation of “the good news of Jesus,” he can’t possibly be Christian. EVERY denomination of the Christian faith disagrees to one degree or another with the tenants of EVERY OTHER Christian denomination. If that weren't so, we'd all still be one denomination. So get over it!
And David, PLEASE. Help me find in Mr Romney’s speech EVEN ONCE where he referred to the Founding Fathers as Christians?? He said they believed in a Creator. He quoted John Adams (last time I checked, one of the founding fathers) who stated, “Our constitution was made for a moral and RELIGIOUS people.” But not ONCE can I find where Mr Romney confused the Founders’ belief in God with the idea that they were all Christian. Are you reading the same speech I read??
Again, I haven’t decided whether I’ll vote for Mit Romney. He seems to have done an great job as a conservative governor in a very liberal state, which speaks VOLUMES about his ability to work well with people he doesn’t necessarily see eye-to-eye with on all things (a refreshing idea after reading some of the childishly intolerant comments above). But whomever I vote for, I’m glad I will be able to sleep at night knowing that he or she DIDN’T take the job of President of the United States because he or she wants to convert the world to his or her faith.
The ONE thing Lew actually got right is that people who’ve already made up their minds about Mit Romney’s worth as a President won’t actually bother READING this speech, but will remain blissfully, and ignorantly stuck in their individual biases about this man.
You should research the Mormon culture before you speak first of all, Mormons are very Christian. Tell me one thing that is not Christian about them? Do you think if Barack Obama is president then he will draw people into the Church of Christ? It goes with any presidential candidate and their religion. I thought Romney did very well in his speech.
What a wonderful speech! I'm actually an Australian, keeping up to date on world events, and feel that the world would be a better place indeed if more people had such a conviction to religious freedom. It was a breath of fresh air to read from someone who stands for something.
I also find it interesting (and a shame) to read the comments that contain such religious prejudice. We don't take into consideration a candidate's religion when we go to the polls in Australia - but what they can offer the country. The reason some of the countries of the world commit some of the most horrendous atrocities and lose their freedom is due to biggotry and ignorance. (eg African Americans in early US history, Hitler and the nazis in WW2, etc)
Anyway - good luck with your elections!
So, this ignorant coward is fine with most religion, as long as people believe in some type of religion. I guess atheists have no place in Romney's version of the United States. If this were a more intelligent nation this speech would eliminate this pathetic smudge of excrement from the race for President.
Religion has NO place in government.
I don't know if anyone will read this so "late in the day", but I have to point out that Mitt's speech is clearly designed to placate those who believe the United States should be (or is) a Christian theocracy. He claims he will preserve religious freedom, yet only acknowledges the existence of the Judeo-Christian-Islamist tradition. He repeatedly uses the "big G" god (common only to Christianity); refers to "THE almighty" (emphasis mine); and only mentions Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. He never acknowledges the alternative beliefs in gods, goddesses,or non-deistic traditions. His vilification of all of us who believe in the real world, and want our country run by people who live here with us, is particularly scary.
Oh, and referring to several of the above posts; your arguments whether Tinkerbell or Santa Claus has the most juju just make me laugh.
I agree with much of what David and N. Steven Nelson said (and some of Dan Lunt's comment). The idea that freedom requires religion is absurd and insulting to those who have a moral compass that originates outside an organized religion. All Romney did was state that he is not a 17th century bigot. Congratulations!! While I prefer his sentiments to anything more fundamentalist, his stance shows a complete inability to think outside the religious box. To Romney, religion is the pillar of a free state.
And, Also Mormon for 40 Years, Romney clearly characterizes the founding fathers as Christians: "But there were objections. 'They were too divided in religious sentiments', what with Episcopalians and Quakers, Anabaptists and Congregationalists, Presbyterians and Catholics." I could be wrong, but all those are Christian. That is religious diversity to Romney (at least in a Republican primary).
I think it interesting that none of the other candidates have to explain their beliefs. Why is it that because there is something new on the table we have to question it and beat it to death? Why are his beliefs even being discussed? Does it matter that he believes in God or not? Does he stand up for what he believes? Does he do what he says he is going to do? Those are the questions that matter.
And to N. Steven...does he have to mention every existing possibility of belief out there? His speech could have lasted years. I think he pretty much covered the basics which is all that needed to be done.
After 9-11 this country seemed pretty religious. All of the sudden neighbors were praying together. People were more polite to one another. Why are we so fickle? Why does a higher being only exist in times of trouble and sadness? We should be grateful at all time for our freedom and for those who have sacrificed so much to give it to us. Yes, we should thank God daily for this great nation that we live in!!!!