Politics

New School President Endorses Old Foe Hillary Clinton

The news that New School president and former Nebraska Senator Bob Kerrey plans to endorse Hillary Clinton and campaign on her behalf in Iowa is noteworthy for its irony. Perhaps no Democrat in the 1990’s was as persistent a thorn in both Clintons' sides as Kerrey was. A brief rehistory:

* In 1991/92, both Kerrey and Bill Clinton seek the Democratic nomination. A decorated Vietnam combat veteran, Kerrey is initially deemed the front-runner, but his chaotic and unfocused campaign quickly loses traction, and Clinton seizes the top slot. Kerrey then shreds Clinton for avoiding service in Vietnam and says that Republicans will open him up "like a soft peanut" in the fall. Besides a meaningless win in South Dakota, Kerrey drops out of the race in early March with little to show for his effort.

* Despite the contentious primary sniping, Kerrey emerges as a finalist for Clinton's vice-presidential slot in July 1992, with many Democrats pushing the idea that Clinton, a southern governor with a potential draft-dodging problem, badly needed the balance that Kerrey, a midwestern senator and war hero, would provide. Reports surface that Hillary Clinton -- still enraged over Kerrey's primary season tactics -- vetoes his selection. Publicly, Bill Clinton denies the reports, but Kerrey is bypassed in favor of Al Gore.

* In the summer of 1993, Clinton's infant presidency, already knocked off course by the gays in the military fiasco and his futile push for a $16 billion "economic stimulus" package, seems to hang in the balance. Facing a wall of Republican opposition and southern Democratic defections, his controversial budget is one vote shy of final passage in the Senate. The lone hold-out? Kerrey, who torments the White House (at one point he and Clinton had a heated phone call in which Kerrey told the president that he resented the implication that Kerrey would bring down his presidency by voting no) until finally, late in the night, assenting to give the budget its 50th vote. (Vice President Gore then broke the tie).

* Kerrey, who championed an expansive national health care program during his '92 campaign, sounds a much more conservative note on the subject as Hillary Clinton pushes her health care plan in 1993 and 1994, delivering a blow to the administration when he joins several moderate-to-conservative Democrats in endorsing a scaled-back plan drawn up by Republican Senator John Chafee.

* As Democrats, hobbled by President Clinton's low poll numbers, suffer historic defeats in the 1994 midterm election, Kerrey publicly brands the President "an unusually good liar," stoking talk that he will challenge Clinton in the 1996 Democratic primaries. Paul Tsongas, who competed with Kerrey and Clinton in the '92 primaries, publicly endorses a Kerrey candidacy. Ultimately, Kerrey begs off and instead chairs the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 1996.

* As Bill Clinton and his allies seek to clear the 2000 Democratic field for Al Gore, Kerrey (after himself declining to run) opts to endorse Bill Bradley, the only Democrat who ends up challenging Gore, and cuts an ad for him in New Hampshire.

Kerrey's motives for endorsing Hillary now are anyone's guess. His actions have been unpredictable, and in many cases contradictory, through the years. Maybe he simply genuinely believes she's the right candidate. Maybe as New York's Senator she's been particularly good to the New School. At least we can rule out one typical endorsement motivation: wanting to be vice president. Since Kerrey and Clinton are both New York residents, they are constitutionally barred from running together next fall.

UPDATE: Local side-note -- as Azi points out, the endorsement can probably be chalked up as a small victory for Fred Hochberg, a New School dean who is a major Hillary fund-raiser.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

DUSTIN (not verified) says:

SENATOR BOB KERRY, IS A TRUE MAN OF SUBSTANCE. HE DOES NOT LIVE IN THE PAST ; LIKE MANY PEOPLE . HE CAN SEE INTO THE FUTURE AND KNOWS WHAT WILL , NOT ONLY BE RIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY , BUT IN TURN ALSO THE WORLD. HE KNOWS RIGHT FROM WRONG AND IS GUTSY.

THIS IS WHY HE HAS BACKED SENATOR CLINTON. HE HAS TAKEN THE HIGH ROAD BECAUSE NOT ONLY DOES HE BELIEVE IN SENATOR CLINTON , BUT MORE SO IN HIMSELF. HATS OFF TO HIM. HOPE THERE ARE MORE PEOPLE MADE LIKE HIM.

Curtis (not verified) says:

Another good example of Hillary willing them over. I really do believe the better people get to know her and what she stands for, the more they like her. That has certainly been the case for me.

williamg (not verified) says:

The more they get to know her the more they will like her? What is there to like? Voting for the Iraq war? Voting for Kyl/lieberman? Voting for the Patriot Act? Being pro NAFTA? Saying the top 6% are the middle class?

Jan (not verified) says:

There are lots of things to like about Hillary. You simply mentioned the things YOU don't like about her.

The reason I like her:
She's brilliant, she knows what the workings of the Executive Branch are, and she's getting ready to kick some serious Rightwing Slime Machine butt.

The reasons you don't like her:
Voting for Bush's Iraq War...
82% of the American people supported Bush's Iraq War, and 70% now believe they were lied to. BUSH LIED/PEOPLE DIED.
Voting for the Patriot Act...
Yeah, along with 99 other Senators. Who's your candidate-- Russ Feingold?!!?
Being pro-NAFTA...
No, actually she said it was a mistake because it was left in the hands of the GOP Congress. You know them -- unending debt, unending war, unending invasion into our privacy, unending incompetence, etc.
Saying the top 6% are middle class...
Well, I get her point about firefighters earning overtime. I guess you didn't.

Fine. Don't vote for her.
I can't wait.
And Bob Kerrey endorsing her is a BIG deal.

F.Igwealor (not verified) says:

“It takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush” – Hillary Clinton. Nov. 19, 2007
Dynasty² - What is your thought on this?
Talk about the politics of entitlement…

Jeugenen (not verified) says:

HILLARY THE LEFTIST PUPPET CANDIDATE

Lacking for a strong real candidate, the Neo-Lib Democrats have run Hillary. The problem is that she has long been observed to be emotionally and intellectually deficient.

Their clever solution is to systematically change her image; under the assumption that the American People are for the most part too simple minded to know the difference between realities and illusions.

To make the Hillary-puppet appear to be compassionate, meticulous studies are made of the social and economic needs of various social and economic goups, such as homosexuals and low income elderly voters. To see who does the research for the emotional Hillary-puppet displays, Google: Mark Penn.

To make the Hillary-puppet appear to be mentally superior, questions must be planted and answers must be rigorously rehearsed. To see who does the research for these brilliant questions and answers, Google: Mark Penn.

The fatal flaw is that the small group of Leftist Democratic masterminds behind this Hillary-puppet Show is just not quite clever enough to successfully pull off their scam. Moral depravity and intellectual bankruptcy are their self-limiting handicaps.

The World is closely watching the American Cultural War; Google: Who Would the World Elect.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.