Style

American Cutie

The Rising Age of Obama May Look Twee, Naïve and Idealistic, But Like Gwyneth Paltrow, the Hobbits, Arcade Fire and Iron Man, It Shows a Scrappy New Generation That Has Learned to Fight

This article was published in the May 19, 2008, edition of The New York Observer.

Tough Twee, Baby! Gwyneth Paltrow returned to <br>public life in Preen bandage dress, 5-inch <br>Alexander McQueen stilettos.
Philip Burke
Tough Twee, Baby! Gwyneth Paltrow returned to
public life in Preen bandage dress, 5-inch
Alexander McQueen stilettos.

In the course of promoting her latest movie, Iron Man, Gwyneth Paltrow has been seen in at least three incredibly short dresses.

There was the black Preen bandage dress, which barely reached the top of her thighs; the Sonia Rykiel sequin number with the vague image of a face patterned into the glitter; and a blazer over what looked to be about one yard total of lacy shiny black, from LBD. Rounding off these outfits was an array of footwear that would feel at home in a fetish-dungeon or on a drag queen: shiny black patent leather Burberry shoe boots, five-inch Alexander McQueen stilettos, seven-inch platform boots by Pacchini.

The 35-year-old mother of two seemed to be channeling a hybrid of Carrie Bradshaw and David Bowie in The Man Who Fell to Earth. And the legs, the heels, said one thing: Naïveté is over; innocence is done; Cutie has been replaced by duty.

“I sort of look at some peers of mine and I think, ‘No, you’ve got it all wrong!’” she told a reporter for InStyle back in November 2005, when she was working the shlumpy, froggy-princess yogini look. “I just want to tell them all to have babies and be happy and not get sucked into that Hollywood thing.”

But that was at the end of the Era of Gwyneth of the careless post-Spence shmattes, of the Wes Anderson and Royal Tenenbaums and her sweet candied-goth look. Gwyneth was to the ’90s what Mia Farrow was to the ’60s, impossibly adorable and … Twee, both in the old British sense—twee was adorable baby talk for “SWEET”—and in the Indie Sense as well, in which Twee was old-fashioned-looking Wellingtons, fresh vegetables, T-strap Mary Janes, fringes or bangs, marmalade, anoraks and tea in a pretty teacup.

What is Twee?

Here are some sample lyrics from the song “White Collar Boy,” from the last album by Belle and Sebastian, who take their name from a French novel and television series from the 1960s about a 6-year-old boy and his dog that live in the French Alps:

 

White collar, scared to be bored

Blue collar, she’s opening doors

White collar, boy on the run from

the law

The law, the law, the law

Get on your bike

Get on your horse

 

The music of ordinariness and naïveté has from time to time taken hold among young people. In 1986, the magazine New Music Express marketed a cassette tape titled C86, featuring a group of British bands with names like the Shop Assistants and the Mighty Lemon Drops. The tape, though it exhibited several different kinds of indie pop sensibility, was quickly influential with young people who had gotten kind of sick of songs about war and suicide and sex and drugs. Bands started forming.

The British music critic Simon Reynolds famously documented what he called the “revolt into childhood” these Cutie (or “Twee”) bands represented. And the lyrics, the jangly-happy guitars and the outfits that defined this movement were collectively referred to by the British fashion magazine i-D as the “Cutie” scene.

“Childlike innocence and assumed naivety permeate the Cutie scene,” the report read. “Their clothes are asexual, their haircuts are fringes, their colours are pastel. Cuties like Penguin modern classics, sweets, ginger beer, vegetables, and anoraks.”

And Millard Fillmore. And suburban drum corps. And Nico. And Frank Capra. And camping out at the museum. And naming their children Apple? Next Page >

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Zach van Schouwen (not verified) says:

This is a pretty poorly cobbled-together series of thoughts, isn't it? Without having to state my opinion on n+1 (aw hell: by and large, I despise it), equating McSweeney's despair for snark and the New Republic's tacit endorsement of the war is absurd. Even discarding the fact that McSweeney's has published more than a few pieces with rather leftish political opinions (see, for example, the 2004-2005 season of The Believer) -- just because n+1 decided to embrace a political agenda doesn't oblige every other literary magazine to take one on. We don't cry if The New Yorker doesn't complain about the war -- that's not their job.

But to dismiss the hope of change through dialogue is "naive" is to be terrifyingly cynical. This article gives into a typically depressing American mindset that nothing's going to get done without heads being bashed in, ignoring that the rest of the developed world has done quite well with consensus politics in the last fifty years. Striving for a place in history, and to do a lot better than the preceding failure of a generation, isn't the work of "naive morons" -- it's what you do when you're not so cranky and embittered that your only recourse is to write a pissy little article in the Observer.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

GOD...the most terrible waste of bytes..time.. i have ever seen...!!!

the above article redefines: DUH

Anonymous (not verified) says:

I'm sorry—what?

This "piece" veers dangerously close to nonsense--it seems that Mr. McGeveran made a list of his favorite topics of the day, cut it up, and stuck it back together with scotch tape. It also displays a laughable naivete regarding the production of entertainment (one which I can barely believe he actually has.) This reads like a third grader's essay on what he wants to be when he grows up.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

I think it comes down to what John Stewart says about extremists, that the rest of us normal folks don't have time to whine because there's work to be done. Something like that anyways. I think the article was interesting, if a little abstract, but there's certainly no need to lambast it. 'This "piece" veers dangerously close to nonsense' is a total crock. It's not nonsense, it's just written at a grade level to high for the prior commenter.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Actually, this was an excellent article, a delight and highlight. You've made me happy, so who cares if some moron didn't enjoy it. We've never met and I don't know if I've ever read you before, but I'll looking for "you"...

jst (not verified) says:

I can't believe this was published, though part of me is kind of impressed and happy for what I hope is a young writer. I keep thinking of the character Booty Tubbs from The Emperor's Children publishing his 19-year-old diatribe in "The Monitor". Tons of ideas here - none fully formed - in desperate need of an editor.

I'm not sure that twee or cute is a relevant trait worth highlighting regarding supporters of Obama. Next time you might draw parallels with the terms "unemployed", "fed up", or "angry" - all motivating factors that I think would trump what's referred to here as a political aesthetic.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

The New Yorker complains about the war all the time, you idiot. As the repository of liberal and intellectual values, that *is* their job. And they do it. Jesus.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Me again. I'm sorry about calling you an idiot, first commenter. You're just a kid. But please try to become a better-informed kid before shooting your mouth off. OK.

ckeav (not verified) says:

I'm curious how all those Estee Lauder ads, magazine covers, and Mediterranean cruises with Valentino fit in between Gwyneth's Wes Anderson, organic mommy, and bondage boots phases.

If She Would Only Sit Still (not verified) says:

Well, I am really pleased to read that there are others out in cyber-world who got lost in this article. I was in a panic because I thought it was me! Yet, another example of my addiction to caffine. (I have not had my morning requirement of expresso. Synapses not firing and all that.) Ha! What a relief! I wanted to stop reading, but I felt lost in a maze and could not find my way out. Perhaps even similiar to seeing a bad accident, and I just could not look away.
Whatever. Did anyone at the Observer proof-read this...? Pardon? What did you say? The proof-reader is on vacation? For how long? 'Cause I have some diatribe stuff that I want to submit... .

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.