Let the Fogies Fawn Over South PacificHair Revival Rocks

This article was published in the August 11, 2008, edition of The New York Observer.

The Public Theater’s <i>Hair</i> at the Delacorte Theatre in Central Park.
Michal Daniel
The Public Theater’s Hair at the Delacorte Theatre in Central Park.

The Public Theater’s smashing new revival of Hair (1967) in Central Park is a joy from beginning to end. It’s just the best, though fans of South Pacific (1947) might not agree with me.

I felt about Lincoln Center’s loving revival of Rodgers & Hammerstein’s South Pacific that while the audience seemed to be in heaven, I was in a retirement home. But Hair is different. Hair is my South Pacific.

“The American Tribal Love-Rock Musical”—to give its glorious subtitle—was the first show I ever saw with performers onstage who were my own age. It’s the musical that spoke directly to my 1960s generation, though there’s another particular affection I have for it: For reasons nobody’s ever been able to figure out, Hair’s stoned hero—Claude Bukowski from Flushing, Queens—likes to pretend he’s from Manchester, England.

As readers of this column may recall, so am I. The sixth song in the show—following the great opening anthem “Aquarius” (“This is the dawning of the age of …”); the infectious tribute to the psychedelic urchin, “Donna”; the paean to chemical abuse in “Hashish” and to the joys of sex in “Sodomy”; and the brilliant mad parade of racist stereotypes in “Colored Spade”—comes the peculiar song titled “Manchester, England” that Claude and the Tribe sing specially for me:

 

Manchester England England

Across the Atlantic Sea

And I’m a genius genius

I believe in God

And I believe that God

Believes in Claude

That’s me.

 

The genius-genius of Hair’s creators—Galt MacDermot, music; Gerome Ragni and James Rado, lyrics—wasn’t only to have created the first rock show in the history of musicals. They broke every theatrical rule and convention. Hair was the first production by Joseph Papp—founder of the New York Shakespeare Festival—that wasn’t Shakespeare; it was the first Off Broadway show to transfer to Broadway (via a midtown disco where it was also staged); and it was the first to have nudity onstage. (Diane Keaton is famously the only member of the original cast who refused to appear naked.)

A NUMBER OF the hippy dropouts onstage were the real thing in the original production on Broadway. They slept overnight in Robin Wagner’s set. They made out with the audience. At the end of the show (which ran for three years), the band played on and the cast partied all night with anyone who wanted to.

Sometimes, stoned audience members would climb onstage during the show to join in the performance, and nobody seemed to mind. Hair was also the first concept musical, and its nonlinear plot has always been on the vague side. The story, about a tribe of New York hippies defying conscription into the Vietnam War, is really a springboard to the show’s now iconic score of 32 songs.

None of them rhyme much. Some end midstream, left deliberately hanging. Some are simply beautiful, like the ballad that sets Hamlet’s “What a piece of work is a man” to music, or forlornly sweet and yearning, like “Frank Mills,” Chrissy’s tale about some guy she met in front of the Waverly on Sept. 12th:

 

I would gratefully appreciate it

If you see him tell him

I’m in the park with my girlfriend

And please

Tell him Angela and I

Don’t want the two dollars back

Just him

  Next Page >

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Another guy from Flushing (not verified) says:

Mr. Heilpern is wrong about several things in this column.

First, Hair was not the first Off-Broadway show to transfer to Broadway. Earlier examples include the 1951 production of The House of Bernarda Alba, the musicals Ballet Ballads, The Golden Apple, and Simply Heavenly, and Calder Willingham's End as a Man. And if I did some research, I wouldn't be surprised to find more.

Going back even further in time, I'd also argue for the inclusion of Pins and Needles and Anna Lucasta, though since there was, as far as I can tell, no official Off-Broadway back then, it gets a bit complicated.

In fact, in some ways it's arguable that Hair didn't really transfer to Broadway as directly as those shows did since the production of Hair that opened on Broadway was a whole new production of the show, with a new producer, a new director, an almost entirely new cast, a new production team, and some textual changes.

Mr. Heilpern writes that "Hair was the first production by Joseph Papp—founder of the New York Shakespeare Festival—that wasn’t Shakespeare." Not true. Papp and the NYSF produced Sophocles' Electra at the Delacorte in 1964.

And it's worth remembering that we're now more than twice as far in time from Hair as Hair was from South Pacific. I keep hearing that the people who are really enjoying the current production of Hair are in their sixties. It reminds them of when they were young. Old fogies? Well, it's all in your perception, isn't it?

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.