Politics

Bill Versus the Snooty Elitists

Getty Images

GREENSBORO, N.C. – Bill Clinton, making a late plea for votes on his wife's behalf here yesterday, asserted that "academic study after academic study" had shown the former first lady to be the victim of "the most slanted press coverage in American history" during this campaign.

Though it was not clear exactly what studies he was referring to, Clinton appeared especially irked by criticism of the senator's proposal to offer consumers a summer 'holiday' from gasoline taxes. Hillary Clinton had earlier defended the plan earlier in the day during an appearance on ABC's 'This Week' with George Stephanopoulos.

Referring to high gas prices as "an emergency for millions of American families", the former president protested during a stop in Newton that his wife's idea had "been roundly criticized by her opponent and all the elite media who say, 'Oh, this is just pandering to the poor working people at election time.'

"Let me tell you something," he continued. "I haven't read a single article accusing her of pandering by somebody who's having trouble filling up their gas tank. This is a classic illustration of one of Clinton's laws of politics: whenever you hear someone snootily saying, 'This is not a money problem', they are not talking about their own problem."

The implication – that not just Clinton's media critics but Obama himself is a snobbish or "snooty" elitist – was hardly accidental.

Clinton's ardor for the campaign trail is much in evidence at the moment. His Sunday schedule took in six rallies across the Tar Heel State, which, along with Indiana, holds its Democratic primary tomorrow. Today, the former president is expected to address nine such gatherings.

In his appearance on the porch of a private home in Newton and later, speaking in a school gymnasium in Kernersville on the outskirts of Greensboro, Clinton emphasized his own humble beginnings again and again.

"Hillary and I were broke in law school," he recalled in Newton. "I had six jobs in law school; never more than three at once. I was young and, shoot, I was so dumb, I didn't think I was poor. I thought I was rich. I could put gas in the car."

To the sweltering crowd in Kernersville, the former president recalled, down to the cent, what his monthly mortgage payments were on his first house ($174.50), as well as what his salary was at the time ($16,000), and how small the house was (1100 square feet).

And, somewhat oddly, he told both crowds a story that, in emphasizing the importance of higher fuel efficiency standards, also highlighted his purported mechanical expertise.

By way of explaining why his wife had asked him to verify a story she had been told about a car that was capable of getting 100 miles per gallon, Clinton said, "I grew up in the car business. I was under a car when I was five or six years old. That's back when a real person could still repair his own car. Not like today."

Sometimes, as when talking about his first house, Clinton struck a gently nostalgic tone. And, in Newton, his irritation at the alleged unfairness of the media was at least leavened by an evident pride in his wife's tenacity. Protesting about the amount of "ridicule" to which he said she been exposed, Clinton added, "The girl just kept churning on, 'cos she is in it for the right reasons."

But at the climax of his appearance in Kernersville, his next stop, he conveyed a more bitter tone. The former president, voice rising, jabbed at those whom he appeared to feel had betrayed Hillary:

"She's been counted out more times than a cat's got lives. And people in places like this kept bringing her back. [The pundits] said, 'Oh, she's going down in California, all the famous people are against her'. Well, they were and she won by ten points, ‘cause the people who needed a president were for her."

The same predictions of doom, he added, were made, "in Massachusetts, where both the senators and the governor are against her. They were. But all the people in Massachusetts who needed a president were for her. She won by 15 points."

In a sharp dig at Obama, albeit one which he has made before, Clinton told the predominantly middle-aged and overwhelmingly white audience, "You just have to decide whether you need a president or a feeling."

The extent to which Clinton seems to view the current campaign as a referendum on his legacy has been much noted in recent weeks. He continued in a similar vein yesterday, reminding the crowds repeatedly of his record on job creation, poverty reduction and fiscal responsibility.

”I left you with four balanced budgets and surpluses," he said to applause in Newton, adding of the Bush administration, "They blew it."

But there were some moments of modesty. The more striking admission came in Kernersville, when the former president said: "I was well qualified to serve in the time in which I was elected. But we are now in two wars." For that scenario, he suggested, his wife was much better prepared.

The other moment of self-deprecation was more light-hearted.

Reflecting on the role his daughter Chelsea has played on the campaign trail, Clinton told the crowd in Newton, "She's turned out to be the family's best politician in some ways."

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

It's Over after North Carolina.... (not verified) says:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Black Voters will make it “RAIN MCCAIN” in Novemebr ---if the super-delegates DARE DENY Obama the nomination.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Truth Teller (not verified) says:

We Clinton supporters need to contact our Congressmen and US Senators and Howard Dean and insist on Michigan and Florida delegates being seated fairly. No 50/50 split which would cancel Hillary’s legitimate wins.

It is ridiculous for Obama supporters to insist that the "voters" in those states DESERVE to lose their voice because the State Party Organizations broke some rules. When did any of us get to decide when or how we vote in primaries or in the general? Get Real...the voters are always innocent bystanders.

Florida can be counted “as is" since Obama and Clinton were on the ballot and no one was favored.

Michigan needs a revote and since they are going to vote on statewide measures on Aug 5th, there is NO REASON why they can't choose between Clinton and Obama at the same time.

Right now, it is Obama and his supporters who are blocking any Michigan revote or Florida seating for that matter.

WE VOTERS need to write Howard Dean and our state superdelegates and convince them that we WILL NOT STAND for the contest to be stacked in favor of Obama because "his supporters might get upset". Hillary's supporters WILL GET UPSET as well if she doesn't get a fair shake and that includes the votes she got from Michigan and Florida. (The media and Howard Dean act as if Obama, by virtue of being black, has a higher claim than Hillary. Listen and you will hear this outrageous bias everywhere.)

If Obama gets his way, it will be all of us who lose since he will have NO chance in November without the support of Michigander and Floridian voters as well as angry voters such as me. We must promise retribution if Howard Dean and the credentials committee refuse to play fair.

Write congress.org and Howard Dean at [www.democrats.org].

Do this today and pass it on please. Time is running out and the Credentials Committee is meeting at the end of May.

thinctank (not verified) says:

truth teller, sorry, but that's why representatives are elected. they made the choice, the wrong one, for their constituents and they f'd up. the contests were not fair and hillary decided as such with obama until she realized she need those votes.

RocketScience (not verified) says:

it stetches the limits of credibility to hear clinton (a alum of georgtown, oxford and yale law school) say that at some point in his life he was "too dumb." this just proves my already cemented beliefs that the clintons will say anything, do anything, stomp anyone, tell any lie, bend any truth, despite the strain on credulity to achieve their goals.

it's amazing to me in this election cycle that the clintons have become the very thing that bill clinton ran against the first time around, namely elitist beltway politicians out of touch with the common citizen.

i think the point made in this article about hillary's campaign being viewed by bill as a referendum on his own presidency is right on the money. this campaign (sorry to tell you this, bill) is for once, not about you.

i was at one time the biggest clinton supporter and defender. this election season has opened my eyes to what the clintons actually are, and it has left a horribly tarnished spot where they used to be in my mind.

obama in 08!

rocketScience (not verified) says:

To Truth Teller ~

GET REAL!

By your own argument, "It is ridiculous for Obama supporters to insist that the "voters" in those states DESERVE to lose their voice because the State Party Organizations broke some rules...." your anger is misplaced. You are requesting that Howard Dean and the credentials committee play fair. They are playing fair. They adhering to the rules set down prior and agreed to by all parties.

Barack Obama didn't make the rules. Barack Obama didn't tell your state's party organization to ignore the rules set down and AGREED TO by all parties (including Hillary Clinton!) Your beef doesn't lie with Barack Obama, Howard Dean, the National Democratic party or even Hillary Clinton for that matter. Your beef should be with your state party officials who ignored the rules and went ahead and did as they pleased knowing full well what the consequences would be. To claim that somehow this is tied to the fact that the candidate winning at the moment (Obama) is black is disgusting. Would you make this claim if the leading candidate were asian? jewish? catholic? hindu? I doubt it.

To say that you and the voters of your state have had their "voice" taken away is false. You have not had your voice (ie, your vote) taken from you. Were you barred from the polling place on primary voting day? No. Will you be barred from your polling place on general election day in November? Of course not. What IS being done is that your state's delegates will not be allowed seating and balloting rights at the national convention due to the fact that YOUR STATE PARTY ORGANIZATION ignored the agreed to rules if they chose to proceed with primary voting early. Don't blame Barack Obama because the candidate you have chosen to support is not winning. Your anger and frustration are misplaced.

Lew (not verified) says:

Democrat party sure not very democratic. Been hijacked over the years by socialists, national socialists and communists. "Super Delegates" who can overide the voters decision, change the rules in the middle of the discourse to benefit the current loser.

Schlomo Nussbaum (not verified) says:

I hope all those who voted for Bill in the 90's feel great shame and embarrassment, when you could have voted for George Bush or Bob Dole.
You can't tell me all of you folks are surprised at the Clinton's behavior???

Suckers.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.