Close Stay up-to-date with
Observer.com Newsletters
Sign up for Observer Newsletters!
RSS Feed
The New York Observer

Brijit, We Hardly Used Ye

View Story On One Page View Story On One Page Print This Story Print This Story Share This Story Share This Story
May 16, 2008 | 12:11 p.m
Brijit, We Hardly Used Ye

It seems like just yesterday—well, late October, anyway—Brijit.com, the website that read and summarized magazines, was launched. At the time, The Washington Post's Frank Ahrens profiled Brijit's founder, Jeremy Brosowsky, and wrote, "[T]he Internet is littered with good ideas that turn out to be bad businesses, and online publishing can be especially tricky: Do you go mass-market or niche? Subscription-based, or free and ad-supported? Original content or aggregation of other content?"

Yesterday, the site ceased publishing new content. In a farewell post on his own site, Brosowsky wrote, "Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, we’ve run out of money, and can no longer afford to pursue our vision of adapting great long-form content for a short-form world, at least not as a stand-alone company. As recently as yesterday morning, we thought we had the funding in place to continue our work together. But as it turns out, we don’t."

According to CNet News' Caroline Murphy, "Brijit, founded less than a year ago, had been funded solely by angel investments." CNet tagged their report "Bubble 2.0 Watch," which raises questions about other similar news aggregator projects like Vanity Fair columnist Michael Wolff's brainchild, Newser.com, and former New Yorker editor Tina Brown's still-incubating project with Barry Diller. Here's what Wolff wrote about the creation of Newser last year in Vanity Fair:

This embarrassment of riches, or of repetition, has resulted in a further news anomaly: the aggregators (such a sexy Internet word). There’s Google News or MyYahoo (the fastest-growing news distributors online), or news services such as Digg, all of which collect, rank, and display news without any human intervention (or in the case of Digg, which ranks news on the basis of user votes, with the help of random passersby and passionate imbeciles). Their owners and managers are interested not in blood and scandal but in collection, in data hierarchies. These are technology guys, not news guys. This results in a kind of autistic tone for the news, undifferentiated, machine-collected headlines from the Times to the Karachi Journal: can’t emotionally relate.

 

Post a Comment The Discussion

Uiklyolip

order propecia - propecia order zithromax - zithromax buy xenical - xenical levitra online - levitra order ultram - ultram buy fioricet online - fioricet valium - valium acomplia online - acomplia buy prozac online - prozac buy ativan - ativan

Thank you for the information

www.observer.com is very informative. The article is very professionally written. I enjoy reading www.observer.com every day. I was looking for the for the following services bad credit loans canada payday loans canadian payday loans cash advance loans faxless payday loans loans online payday loan online payday loans online payday loans canada payday payday advance payday loan payday loans pay day loans payday loans canada payday loans in canada payday loans online
cash loans
and discovered that payday loans can help in times when your credit sucks, but you urgently need cash.

Post a Comment
Not a registered user? Register here.
Don't have an Observer.com account? You can use your Facebook account instead.