Developers Want Easier Access to High Line Air Rights; But Should City Fix Something That Doesn’t Look Broken?

This article was published in the February 13, 2008, edition of The New York Observer.

The High Line.
IReallyLoveCake’s Flickr
The High Line.

The allure of the High Line seems to be inspiring nearby landowners to grip their air rights tight, causing what some developers see as a shortage of development rights that could slow construction in the area surrounding the viaduct-turned-parkland.

The Real Estate Board of New York, responding to the concerns of multiple developers who were unable to find air rights to buy, has asked the city to consider changes to zoning regulations in West Chelsea that would allow for an easier transfer of those rights.

The city rezoned the area in 2005, allowing for a large district around the High Line in which air rights could be transferred, and also allowing for a bonus that permitted developers denser apartment buildings if they include one-fifth of the units as affordable housing.

“There seems to be a few developers who have encountered this difficulty, and would like to take advantage of the inclusionary bonus, as well as buy the air rights,” said Michael Slattery, a vice president at REBNY. “We’re trying to take advantage of a good housing market.”

The shortage could stem from the rush by so many landowners to build, as the High Line has opened the gates for a stampede of new construction in West Chelsea, with high-end ultramodern condos going up between warehouses and art studios.

“The amount of development surprised people. We thought it was going to be developed much more slowly,” said Robert Hammond, co-founder of the Friends of the High Line, which spearheaded the entire High Line effort. “When the rezoning was originally anticipated, I thought it would be developed out over several development cycles.”

Not so much. Mr. Hammond said that his group is tracking 41 projects in various stages of development in the blocks surrounding the High Line, which runs from Gansevoort Street to 34th Street.

Any action from the city, at this point, seems unlikely. A spokeswoman for the Department of City Planning, Rachaele Raynoff, said at first glance the zoning changes seem to be functioning as planned, though the city is examining REBNY’s request.

“So far it would appear that it’s working, but they’ve raised this issue to us, and we’re taking a look,” Ms. Raynoff said.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

REBNY FOOLISHNESS (not verified) says:

With property values having grown so much so fast who could pity the poor landowners not able to maximize their holdings.
Yes that is what we want
a Park lined with high rises crowding out the sun.
REBNY give me a break!
WELFARE FOR THE RICH!

Another Point of View (not verified) says:

The problem is that in some sections of the High Line corridor, developers choosing to build affordable housing are not permitted to get any inclusionary housing bonus UNLESS they first buy an equal amount of high line air rights. Since the owners of some of these air rights do not want to sell, why should the city be deprived of this affordable housing? Why shouldn't an affordable housing bonus be just as good as buying another landowner's high line air rights?

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.