Facebook Gets Frisky With Your Most Feared “Friends”

in John Hughes' The Breakfast Club.
MORE
The New York World
The other weekend I went to a housewarming party that an editor I know was throwing in Prospect Heights. It was one of those parties where everyone there is someone you’ve seen at another media party but never hung out with one-on-one and the conversations tend to veer toward industry gossip (stuff like: “Well, I’m considering taking the editor-at-large position”), what I like to call byline stalking (“I loved your profile of Chelsea Clinton, but your blog post on your corner deli was hysterical”) and not-so-subtle undermining (“That Web site seems like a really good place for you right now”).
One woman, who is always wearing the types of dresses I wish I owned because they seem perfectly suited to media parties—simple, black, vaguely vintagey-looking, knee-length, very flattering—made a beeline for me.
“Hey! So, um, Facebook thinks we should be friends!” she said. “I mean, friends on Facebook. But I didn’t want you to think that I was only friend-requesting you because Facebook said I should, so I didn’t ask you yet, and …”
I was confused. “What do you mean, Facebook thinks we should be friends?”
“Oh! Well, you know that thing on your Facebook page that says something like, You might know so-and-so?”
I shook my head. “I haven’t been on in a few days.”
“Oh, O.K., well, I’m totally going to request you as a friend but I don’t want you to think that it’s only because Facebook thought I should, because I was going to anyway, and—”
A few minutes later I went over to talk to another writer, who immediately said, “Facebook keeps suggesting friends of yours who I should be friends with!”
What the hell was going on?
A couple weeks ago, Facebook quietly introduced a new feature, “People You May Know” that, in essence, suggests other people you may want to be friends with. From what I can gather (Facebook did not respond to a request for comment), Facebook seems to cull your networks and figure out who your friends are also friends with. In theory, this sounds fine, if a little pushy. In practice, it seems really pushy.
The notion of “If you like John, you’ll also like Jane” works on Netflix (if you liked His Girl Friday, you’ll love A Streetcar Named Desire!) and Amazon and iTunes—indeed, anything media-related seems legit. But with people it can just seem … creepy. And, in fact, invasive.
“The annoying and retarded thing about Facebook is that it’s supposed to be a ‘social networking’ site, but they miss the obvious thing about being social: Most people just freaking hate some of their dearest friends’ friends,” said writer Ian Spiegelman, who is 34. “No one can stand everyone who runs in their same circles. And Facebook just keeps shoving it in my face that so many people I trust and admire are at least nominally friends with people I find to be reprehensibly not admirable and totally untrustworthy.”
In other words, Facebook is forcing friendship Venn diagrams to intersect in, potentially, the wrong ways. My preppy tennis partner (if I had one) is not likely to get along with my co-worker who lives in Williamsburg and goes to indie rock shows every night, just because they’re friends with me. What this feature does so clumsily is that it takes a kind of wild, random shot in the dark that the things that make you friends with one person will necessarily make you friends with their friends, even though that is almost always not the case.
For example, one of my close friends from college—we’ll call him Matt—is an architect, and, well, I find many of his architect friends kind of uptight. Also, they only want to talk about architecture! (One might argue that writers only want to bitch about editors, which might be why Matt’s friends have never been interested in pursuing a friendship with me, either.) I’ve known his friends for at least five years now, and the only times I see them are at Matt’s parties; we’ve never felt compelled to “get drinks” or “get lunch” or “get coffee” (or even pretend to “get drinks/lunch/coffee” in that way in which neither party will, in fact, call the other, but it makes everyone feel better to pretend that they will).
Becoming friends with people is a funny thing; it’s predicated on some seemingly irrational mix of common interests + sense of humor + proximity + style, all of which is dependent upon some kind of chemistry taking hold, plus effort on at least one person’s part. In some ways, it seems natural that Facebook would try to match people up; after all, isn’t that what some online dating sites do? You’re matched up with people who some computer formula has decided you might not only get along with, but also be attracted to.
But maybe that’s part of the problem; what seems to work in the realm of dating might just seem weird in the realm of friendship, or even networking. (Besides, as a 31-year-old online columnist put it, “I have actual friends I don’t really want to ‘friend’ in the Facebook sense. Why would I want to invite these total strangers into my world?”)
It also raises some other delicate issues, namely, maybe people aren’t friends with their friends’ friends for a concrete reason. “I was just talking with a friend about this,” said Katie Baker, 27, an assistant at Newsweek. “Facebook keeps recommending this guy who she used to kind of date, and then they had a huge falling out and she won’t talk to him anymore and he occasionally stalks her. So her response is kind of like, ‘Fuck you, Facebook!’”
“I’ve been feeling like somehow Facebook knows to recommend the very people whose existence I try to forget,” said a 30-year-old writer who lives in Park Slope. “There’s the ex-boyfriend’s roommate’s girlfriend who always inexplicably hated me; there’s the middle-aged writer who asked me out even though I knew he lived with his girlfriend; there’s the girl I went to college with who wears men’s ties every day and who still seems to think that makes her cool and quirky. In real life, I’m friends with none of these people, and the fact that Facebook recommends us to be ‘friends’ only underscores how ludicrous the meaning of friendship is on social networking sites.”
Indeed, this new feature seems to be raising more than a little anxiety among New York’s notoriously neurotic media set, if only because for many of them, this is their first experience on a social networking site—Friendster was too new, too untested, for many of the writers and editors who now carefully cultivate friends like so many high-profile bylines; MySpace too adolescent and, let’s face it, déclassé; LinkedIn too straight-laced marketing-consultanty—and now, to be reminded of the other prominent people in their field who they’re not friends with, and yet, their friends, seemingly inexplicably, are—well, it’s all just a bit too much.
“It messes with the whole evolution of your social networking identity,” said one 32-year-old writer who lives in Boerum Hill. “There’s a period at the very beginning of your Facebook life, after you first sign up, when you’re madly friend-ing everyone in your address book. It’s the needy phase: You’re trying to establish and legitimize yourself as a user. Then you mature to a more placid state—you stop accepting application requests. Maybe you even stop playing Scrabulous. It’s a relaxing time.
“But this new feature makes you feel needy all over again,” this writer continued. “Its infernal machine logic taunts you with people who could, theoretically, be your friends—but aren’t. Your page once served to document the extent of your social support network. Now it advertises the people you never connected to—the friends you don’t have.”




















This dopey piece misses the point. The so called "friends" you accumulate on a small world, Facebook etc are not your friends.
They are just an accumulation of faces and names you use to impress your friends, some of whom may not be your friends either.
cebook keeps suggesting i should be friends with my ex. and my ex's friends. ew.
Why not do some research and find out how the sidebar works. How it selects friends. That might be interesting. But just complaining about social media is irrelevant. Also- this feature of people you may also know is on linkedin and other sites.
This is great. It's wonderful to openly discuss how facebook is a driving force in people's social lives, especially mine. I was in the "relaxing phase" on FB until randoms I sort of knew started friending me again. It made me nervous; why were people I went to high school with 5 years ago thinking about me again? I finally realized it was this new feature that was to blame. And it's in the Observer. So it's real news.
Nowhere on facebook does it actually suggest for anyone to be your friend. This piece horribly misconstrues the actual feature and what it does, so the author could write the snarky, condescending piece that she wanted. Research is more than quoting your friends to support your thesis.
I am disapponted Doree
It keeps showing me people I didn't like in high school. Though, to its credit, I do actually know them.
This is my least favorite Doree Shafrir-bylined feature that I've ever read. You sound like a crotchety old parent complaining that the music is too loud.
I thought it was kind of funny. How come the Observer comments are so filled with hate? Get Jesus into your lives, people!
This was a funny story, simple as that. Why get all anal about exactly how Facebook works? It's not a news article. That info would only bog this humor piece down. And we all know these aren't real friends. Nobody needs to state the obvious. It's an entertaining look at the dark side of so-called "friend" sites. It works perfectly to achieve that goal. Lighten up!
I haven't yet seen this feature in Facebook, but I don't discount that it exists. Perhaps it's my marginal use, and the fact that I'm in the UK?
"Making all [your] nowhere plans for nobody."
I could not waste my time with this idiotic trend. I have a real life to live!
Why must so many journalists on the "web beat" (okay, let's just call them bloggers) feel the need to turn every story about Facebook into an exercise in histrionics?
If you genuinely find this feature "creepy," you really have some living to do. Living, that is, outside of web surfing and attending media parties. Faces of Death videos are kinda creepy. This? This is not.
First of all, you'll only see this feature if you're already trying to "find" a "friend." Even then you have to click on something to check the results. But all it's doing is culling data that's been available to you all along -- visit anyone's public profile and you can already see which friends you have in common. Facebook has merely added a very basic tool that reports this data in an organized fashion.
Honestly, anyone who's not a complete idiot should have expected this feature to come around eventually. I'm surprised it took them so long. Yes, there's the danger that you're going to "run into" someone you're purposely avoiding or vise versa. But did you know you can BLOCK said people, and that they'll never see your profile or pictures?
There you go! It's a perfect opportunity to show people that you're better than them by proactively blocking them, and appearing as though you've never even joined this Book of Faces! Block these hated individuals. And if you're not willing to go through that little effort, don't complain about it so damn much.
People you know and dislike are a part of life. For some, more than others. It's not Facebook's duty to protect you from all discomfort. And seriously, if there are that many people out there whom you hate and that you believe hate you...well, it's probably because you're a bit of an asshole. Sorry to break it to you.
Your friend,
This article raises several red flags for me. One, although Facebook is chided and derided, there's no comment from Facebook on how this works or why they would think it's useful to their users. It's rather unfair to take them to task without allowing them comment.
Two, why is everyone who is quoted nearly the same age, living in nearly the same parts of town (namely, the fancy parts of Brooklyn) and in media? Show of hands: who's willing to wager that these are just the author's friends? Is there no one outside of New York media who uses Facebook? And while we're at it, is there no one who will stick up for it?
Lastly, why is anonymity granted to "writers"? Since when is dishing on Facebook grounds for anonymity? These are not government secrets, people. I don't even want to get started on last week's magazine-talent article, which was littered with untraceable anonymous sources and not a shred of hard numbers. Where are the Observer editors that raise these questions?
They're not social networking sites…they're pigeon holing sites. They just put you in a: box.
This conversation is retarded.
The whole idea that Facebook is "pushing" you to be friends is totally retarded.
As the owner of a profile, you have the CHOICE to choose what you want to do, who you want to be friends with etc. The feature basically guesses "friends" based on multiple friends of yours already being "friends" to the people suggested. There is no reason that you have to become friends with them and send them annoying requests if you don't want to. And anyway, they have to ACCEPT your request anyway...
I would expect though that people who would love to be friends with their friends' "cute" friends are only too happy to use this feature and blame it on the program. Besides, you could always sift through your friends' friend list previously and contact people thus; so this new feature is just an accentuation of an older "social technique".
Anyway, the least facebook could probably do is to allow that feature to be hidden, or as an alternative, to NOT SUGGEST certain names that u could choose again.
And stop whining, the lot of you!
acebook is scary. is it not worrying that on a database there is a list of all the 'friends' you may know (most of the people I do know, I just have no interest in adding them as a facebook friend and giving them the opportunity to stalk me.)
I'm only friends with people I know closely (family etc) and the odd person facebook is the only means of contact. I put nothing on there.
If they try and invade my privacy anymore I'm deleting it. Privacy is good, facebook in its current state is not.
Heres a nice link, whilst alot of it is over-exagerated it does make some interesting points.
http://www.albumoftheday.com/facebook/
On a music forum I use, somebody was talking about the apprentice contestant Alex negatively. Within two hours hed been sent on facebook a message kindly telling the user not to be so jealous of him. That is scary right? welcome to 1984