In Front of 'Adulatory' Crowd Obama Remains Cautious About S.C. Win
COLUMBIA, S.C. – Barack Obama raised the specter of his defeat in New Hampshire during his final pre-election speech to supporters here last night.
Obama finds himself, as he did in the Granite State, with a significant lead in the polls heading into Election Day. But a repeat of his traumatic loss in New Hampshire would deal his candidacy a potentially fatal blow.
Speaking to a capacity crowd at the Koger Center for the Arts shortly after 11 p.m. last night, Obama recalled that "everybody was so excited" after his win in the Iowa caucuses.
"I think people started thinking, 'This is not hard.' But you know that the status quo doesn't give up that easily…The status quo resists," he said.
One manifestation of that resistance, Obama said, was the smear leveled against him in anonymous emails suggesting that he is secretly a Muslim. After emphasizing his lengthy membership of the Christian church in Chicago where and wife Michelle were married ("We sit in church and we pray"), Obama added that the issue was not merely one of accuracy.
"They are insulting a religion," he said. "They are trying to feed on fear. It's the same old okey-doke, the same bamboozlement. They are trying to hoodwink you."
Obama added, "That's what Washington does when the status quo is threatened." As he has before, the phrasing implicated Hillary Clinton as part of this status quo, if not part of the actual smear.
And there is no evidence that the Clinton campaign has any involvement in false messages suggesting Obama is Muslim. But a few moments later, when the candidate launched into a familiar riff proclaiming "No Bush! No Cheney!," a young African-American woman in the back of the hall shouted out, "No Hillary!"
Obama seemed energized throughout the speech and the atmosphere in the hall was nothing less than adulatory. But the increasingly embattled tone that has entered into the campaign in the past week or so was also in evidence.
Obama promised to end "the toxic politics that we've become accustomed to" – a fairly clear jab at the Clintons -- and added that his candidacy was predicated on the idea that people were ready for "straight talk and honesty and truth" rather than "spin and P.R."
Michelle Obama, who, with former South Carolina governor Jim Hodges, introduced the candidate, sounded a similar theme. She asserted that her husband "stands for so much more than just winning."
(In turn, Obama later described her as "the best wife any man could ever have.")
The applause and cheering for Obama was at times almost deafening in the 2,400 person-capacity venue. And the audience often broke into his speech, most memorably when he spoke about "the odds of me standing here today." He noted that he did not come from wealth and added, "I didn't have a famous name."
"You do now!" came a loud voice from the crowd, prompting chants of "O-bam-a! O-bam-a!" and one of several standing ovations.
Emerging from the auditorium, 28-year-old middle school teacher Monique Flowers said the event was "awesome."
She added, "I am so happy to be a part of such a historic event. You know when some image flashes up on T.V. and your parents say they were there? Well, when I get married and have kids, I am going to be able to tell them I was there for this."
Flowers said she had seen Obama in person several times before. She had no problem with hearing what is, in effect, the same speech over and over.
"It's like a singer," she said. "You can hear a good singer sing the same song, but they'll do it a little different and every time you'll get something new out of it."
Two new polls out this morning, from Zogby and SurveyUSA, give Obama a lead of 15 and 13 points, respectively. After New Hampshire, though, his campaign is taking nothing for granted.


















Let's watch the "Clinton Movie" swing into their post Southern Strategy mode -- for the Feb. 5th States. First up, Joan Walsh of Salon.com asserting on MSNBC today that Mr. Obama tainted the Clintons with a false claim they inserted race into the SC campaign. Salon.com, ever the feminist Clinton supporter-as-journalist aka Gloria Steinem, Joan Walsh is now spinning that the Clintons have been unfairly tarnished as having stoked Southern racial divisions -- just in time for the CA an NY Primaries -- a sophisticated brushing up of the Clintons' Southern Strategy. So, for the record -- Bob Herbert's Op-Ed today reminds us of the TRUTH since Iowa/NH where the Clintons were stunned and VERY secure about their Northern Strategy. If you also add the remarkable SPECTACLE of Bob Johnson comparing Barack to Sidney Poitier in a movie (a United States Senator?) and Hillary Clinton clapping watching the performance, you will realize it Joan Walsh and Salon.com that has left their journalistic credentials. It is not her job of that of any CA feminist journalist to CLEAN UP the Clintons' Southern Strategy ACT, nor is it David Schuster or Chuck Todd's. Also, WHY does it matter how the vote is split in SC, racially? It doesn't. Chuck Todd/MSNBC, African-Americans are equal to White Iowans and rural NH residents -- and so are their votes. Ditto, if Cuban-Americans in S. Florida vote for a candidate they like...or WOMEN in NH fall for Hill's tears. STOP diminishing the African-American votes...or that of women who back Hillary. If Barack WINS, he WINS. The racial breakdown is Bill Clinton's playing the expectations game based on, as he always does, RACE. Maybe it is time to address WHY Bill constantly is obsessed by it -- and, ask him to STOP.
NYTimes.com - 1/26/08 - Op-Ed Bob Herbert
This week, while making the remarkable accusation that the Obama camp was responsible for raising the race issue, Mr. Clinton mentioned Andrew Young as someone who would bear that out. It was an extremely unfortunate reference.
Here’s what Mr. Young, who is black and a former ambassador to the United Nations, had to say last month in an interview posted online: “Bill is every bit as black as Barack. He’s probably gone with more black women than Barack.”
He then went on to make disgusting comments about the way that Bill and Hillary Clinton defended themselves years ago against the fallout from the former president’s womanizing. That’s coming from the Clinton camp!
Now that the old (conflicted by post Civil Rights BUSINESS DEALS) guard African-Americans like Bob Johnson, Andrew Young, etc. have done their (repayment) duty to the Clintons and imploded their reputations in the process (as you must when the Clintons call), watch for more sophisticated, cleaned-up versions to make the next rounds -- aka Faye Wattleton, former head of Planned Parenthood. African-American feminists will be trotted out to defang the taint of the Southern Strategy cynically deployed leveraging Bob Johnson, Charlie Rangel, Andrew Young to behave in a way that would make MLK pull out a gun himself. Sorry Faye. Do dice. We will remember Bob Johnson's performance and Hillary's clapping during it and refusal to disassociate herself from it -- forever. Ladies/gentlemen, there is a HIGH price to support "the Clintons." The price: Your dignity and self-respect. We SAW this over and over and over during their years in The White House. The Republicans will be trotting ALL of this history out. TURN THE PAGE!
I agree 100%. And I used to support/defend the Clintons prior to their dirty contributions to this race! To think that my staunch dedication to the democratic party blinded me to their lies, distortions, and yes, Washington tactics, makes me embarrassed.