G Train Rally Kicks Off Campaign to Improve M.T.A.'s 'Forgotten Stepchild'

"The four-car G train is just like one step above the horse and buggy days," State Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries of Brooklyn told the crowd at Wednesday night's Save the G rally at Lafayette Avenue Presbyterian Church in Fort Greene.
Almost 100 G riders kicked off a monthlong campaign to increase service on the "forgotten stepchild" of the New York subway system, as Mr. Jeffries and others have called it.
"It's important to increase the intensity of the public campaign," Mr. Jeffries said, "to stress to the M.T.A. that G train service enhancements are absolutely necessary."
On June 25, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority board will meet to discuss systemwide service improvements. Mr. Jeffries, who organized the rally, intends to make sure the G is a top priority. In the coming weeks, G advocates will be writing letters, sending e-mails and corralling the support of elected officials in an effort to "convince the M.T.A. to do the right thing," as Mr. Jeffries put it.
In February, the agency announced a plan to increase the frequency of G service during off-peak hours, but these additions have been put on hold indefinitely.
"The M.T.A. is aware of these problems [on the G] but sometimes they just need to be reminded," said Cate Contino of the Straphangers Campaign.
Ms. Contino was one of a number of speakers who illuminated the unique woes of the G: truncated four-car trains, a lack of street transfers, long waits and a history of service reductions. Cuts to the G have occurred despite the route's expanding ridership, especially in the neighborhoods of Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bedford-Stuyvesant. In a recent rider report card survey, the G received a D+.
Joe Chan, of the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership, a nonprofit local development corporation, spoke of the need to grow downtown Brooklyn as one of the city's financial hubs—a project he says is hindered by the inadequacies of the G line.
The capacity crowd also included the president of the Pratt Institute, Thomas Schutte, as well as a representative from Brooklyn Borough President Marty Markowitz's office, City Council members, community leaders and residents of Brooklyn and Queens. It was Mr. Jeffries' rousing call and answer that received the audience's loudest response:
"What do we want?" he chanted.
"More G service!"
"When do we want it?"
"Now!"





















i was at the rally and certainly support more G train service, but i'm not sure why the MTA has any reason to listen to Hakeem Jefferies after he was an outspoken opponent of congestion pricing and just voted to slash their budget. i wish he would have stepped up as a transit advocate about 6 months ago when we really needed him...
i was at the rally and certainly support more G train service, but i'm not sure why the MTA has any reason to listen to Hakeem Jefferies after he was an outspoken opponent of congestion pricing and just voted to slash their budget. i wish he would have stepped up as a transit advocate about 6 months ago when we really needed him...
What's wrong with the 4-car G train? It's not like it's ever too crowded. And if it takes 4 cars to get more frequent service, great.
My only complaint that it's always under construction on the weekends (the shuttle trains, the limited service to Brooklyn stations, etc.) and that it only goes to Queens when I don't need to.
12:26p- you obviously never take the northbound G during rush hour.
What an ignorant comment. Jeffries never voted to slash the MTA budget. In fact, he and other members of the Assembly voted in March to provide hundreds of millions of dollars in mass transportation funding per year to the MTA through imposition of a marginal tax rate increase on people who make over a million dollars. The plan passed the Assembly with backing from Jeffries, but died in the Senate due to lack of support from Bruno and Bloomberg, his main financial backer. For the record, the legislature never voted on the Mayor's congestion pricing bill, because it lacked support from an overwelming number of Assembly democrats.
Right. And Jeffries is one of those Assembly Democrats who could have publicly and privately supported the bill, and leaned on Shelly Silver to bring it to the floor. If all of the Assembly Dems wanted the bill, the Speaker would not have held it back. Yes?
4-car G-trains are not the problem, especially when they run frequently. The unpredictability and limited range of service is a problem. If a 4-car train ran every 5 minutes (10 overnight), and ideally a few more stops at each end, no one would complain. Instead, the MTA has been scrapping old cars as the R160s come online. Theoretically, OPTO has freed up some personnel to operate these additional trains as well.
Extending the train to Church will help, but extending Culver Line express service to Kings Hwy or Stillwell terminal would be even better, and would give a better transit option for south Brooklyn. The existing tracks are already in place.
i live in sunnyside - i take a bus to get to williamsburg. i've waited for a G train over an hour on saturday afternoon. I would literally take it every weekend if it was reliable. I think that people have given up. If they made it so it was a working train - i guarantee it would be used. It's classist that the MTA has given up. Maybe the hipsters will have a rare positive effect. Maybe the MTA will care about all the rich white kids moving to Greenpoint!