Hillary: Unity is Nice, But For What?
February 4, 2008 | 3:56 p.m
WORCESTER, Mass.—In a slightly altered stump speech delivered here this afternoon, Hillary Clinton challenged Barack Obama by arguing that it was more worthwhile to use unity to reach a goal rather than just espouse unity for unity’s sake.
“There are differences between me and my opponent—differences in approach and vision an understanding of what it is going to take to make the changes that we want,” said Clinton. “You know change is hard. I wish it were easy. I wish all you had to do was just say it’s going to happen, and it would materialize. But it’s going to take hard work. It’s going to take every single one of us being committed to a different future for our children.”“And unity is important, but unity for what, is more important,” said Clinton. “Unity for a strong and prosperous middle class?”
- More:
- Politics |
- Barack Obama |
- Hillary Clinton |
- Massachusetts |
- Politics Daily |
- Super Tuesday



Suddenly, a Trillion Is Too Much?
Touré Writing Book About 'Post-Blackness' For Free Press
The Week in Interviews: Megan Fox on Genius, Bubbles in Retirement, and a HuffPo Reporter Calls Someone 'Pathetic'
Are Danes and Dancy the New Tinz and Topper?
Original Real Estate Stories This Week on Observer.com
Bike Community Goes After John Liu Over Yassky's Bill
Opening this Weekend: Celebrate July 4th with Johnny Depp in a Fedora and Those Cute Critters from Ice Age!