Hitchens, Briefly

MORE The New York World
Christopher Hitchens, the British-born journalist-turned-American citizen circa 2007, stopped by New York University’s journalism building recently. After class my friend Sophie and I tailed him to the elevator, where he was chatting with Steve Wasserman, former book review editor of The Los Angeles Times, and a lissome brunette with a book contract: stiff competition.
“Mr. Hitchens, I just want to tell you what a fan I am,” said Sophie, extending her hand. Catching her London accent, he smiled and said, “Well, you’re a long way from home. Would you like a drink?”
“Of course,” Sophie replied, a bit surprised, eyeing the floor indicator on the rapidly approaching elevator.
“Great,” he said, “who knows the closest place?”
Sophie glanced at me.
“I know a place right by here,” I said. Mr. Wasserman and the brunette looked peeved.
I stepped into the elevator with Mr. Hitchens, exchanging furious hand signals with Sophie. “Get our stuff,” I pantomimed, realizing I had left my wallet and jacket in the classroom. “Don’t let him get away,” she mimed back.
We went down. Mr. Hitchens is imposing: sharp eyebrows, a bit jowly, the hint of a pompadour. Outside, Mr. Wasserman bid Mr. Hitchens goodbye, receiving a smacking kiss on the cheek in return.
But the brunette wasn’t ready to quit. She smiled wide and made her move.
“I’m going to meet some friends at a wine bar,” she said, her gaze focused on her prey. “Would you like to join us?”
What chance did I have? I should have sent Sophie—tall and beautiful Sophie—down the elevator with Hitch instead.
“Well I would love to,” he said to the brunette. “But I’m meeting a friend later and I don’t think I should stray too far.”
“I know a place right around here,” I broke in. “A little bit of journalism history.”
He nodded, “McSorley’s. Yes, that is right near here.”
The brunette made another try. She wanted Mr. Hitchens’ number, so she could call him later. He told her he didn’t have a cell phone. She demanded my number. I gave it to her, reversing the final two digits. Ooops.
Sophie appeared with our jackets.
“I used to go to McSorley’s when I lived in New York,” said Mr. Hitchens, who now resides in D.C. “I had to stop going. In those days there were no women allowed.” He paused. “That wasn’t necessarily a bad thing.”
We took a seat in the back. The tables were old and wooden, the walls covered in memorabilia. The waiter, in strong Irish brogue, read us McSorley’s drink menu: “Light or dark?”
Sophie went light, Mr. Hitchens and I dark. He took a sip and turned to Sophie. “So,” he asked, “where exactly are you from?”
They chatted about the old country. Places with names like Glossberry and Carknuckle. I drank my beer. Mr. Hitchens said he’d come from a Navy family. I looked at Sophie; she was enchanting. I was back to square one.
Quick, I thought, change the subject. What about the passing of Norman Mailer?
“Very sad,” Mr. Hitchens said. “For people my age, his books were huge events, a way to mark the passing of time.” He recalled reading an advance copy of one of Mailer’s less successful novels. “It was like this,” he said stretching out his arms. “You just read a page, ripped it off, and kept going through the pile.”
I asked if he was working on any fiction of his own. He said no, but there was a memoir in the works. He was currently reading Arthur Koestler as inspiration. Next Page >



















Why is this even remotely interesting? Groupies angle for a genuflecting sip with the Hitch. Fascinating.
Disagree with Conrad. This isn't a news piece, it's a vignette -- and a well written one.
Thanks for the support JRS. Conrad is right about one thing though, I'm a Hitchen's groupie through and through.
bP
I have a "convergence" with Hitchens from his days as a NATION columnist: AS a self-aware lefty "peacenik" for 40 years (& conscientious objector to the Vietnam debacle), I was always startled to marvel how I virtually NEVER could find anything to disagree with in Hitchens NATION columns (the only columnist there I cared to read "religiously," with apologies to Hitchens' atheism). I thought how strange that he seemed to anticipate (or vice versa) my own opinions, far more elegantly asserted of course.
Then I discontinued my sub to the NATION, lost track of him for years, and became disaffected from an increasingly cult-like, out-of-touch left wing which seemed more interested in "one-upping" each other with the latest, supposed American foreign policy outrage. Then I read Hitchens was about to take leave of the NATION magazine early in fall of 2002, ...much to my amazement: and over the IRAQ WAR. THIS issue too was the final straw of my own disaffections with the "left" in CT. I simply could NOT abide how my former allies routinely ignored Saddamite evils.
AND then there was Hitchens, as if on CUE, once again mirroring my deeper thoughts and disaffections. I am a former lefty peace-activist, who not only "vigiled" all those years (until 1996 for me...) for removal of the Iraq sanctions (until the set-up of the UN Oil-for-Food program, now recognized as the most corrupted UN program ever). But, I also longed for some lefty balance in also condemning Saddam Hussein,...which was never to be.
Finally, by 2002, while closely watching the reported debate within the Bush White House over the final cinfrontation with Saddam Hussein, I was almost literally "PRAYING" for the invasion by Bush (with apologies again to Hitchens atheism!). Being more knowledgeable than most I know on the Iraq issue all these years, I valued Hitchens very informed opinions (Hitchens has even heard of such as Abdul Rahman Yasin, as I certainly had too...).
I was then AMAZED, by October 2002, to seek out & read his valedictory NATION column, ...AMAZED that he was STILL right there beside me, yet once again, ...NOW about the most crucial issue of the Bush "W" era!
Nevertheless, my own true mysticalities of "mytho-poetic personal experience" refute his too determined "anti-theism." But, WHO can deny the spiritually enslaving, obviously all too MURDEROUS foolishness of organized religion. Yet, I wonder how Hitch can reconcile his statements on the Sally Quinn program recently, "On Faith," where he acknowledges appreciation for the "mysterium tremendum," within great architecture and music, or within what he calls the "transcendant," ...
HOW to reconcile THIS "transcendant" then with his too determined, very "angry" atheism,...ALL without his also acknowledging some form of "intelligent design" to the very weirdness of the universe, in the face of the gaping black-hole maw of rootless "unbelief," ...that "intelligent design" being, of course, ONLY of each individual's "karmic" convictions spiraling onward into the infinite cosmos from the infinite past!
I'm glad you wrote it -- I didn't know Hitchens was working on a memoir, but I'd been hoping he would. Thanks for posting this piece. And Conrad, the first commenter: don't be a wanker.
once again mirroring my deeper thoughts and disaffections. I am a former lefty peace-activist, who not only "vigiled" all those years