McCain Has His Own Farrakhan

MORE
Joe Conason
Whatever their true private beliefs, presidential candidates in America are constantly required to provide proofs of their faith, often through their connections with various religious figures. Benedictions from the pulpit can bestow an aura of righteousness—except, of course, when the pastor or minister is a disreputable kook whose endorsement should be an embarrassment.
In recent weeks, both Barack Obama and John McCain have suffered exactly this kind of indignity, under very different circumstances. And their contrasting responses revealed not only aspects of their own characters but also the enduring prejudices of the national media covering this year’s campaign.
For an African-American politician seeking to attract voters of all ethnicities and persuasions, there could hardly be a less desirable supporter than Louis Farrakhan, the aging leader of the Nation of Islam. As the media never tire of reminding us, Mr. Farrakhan is a habitual bigot whose utterances have repeatedly denigrated Jews, Catholics, Caucasians and homosexuals, among others, seeking to inflame his followers against these supposed enemies. He detects conspiracies of “international bankers,” whose machinations he blames for all the world’s troubles dating back to World War II. He looks forward to a time when the Holy Land will be “cleansed by blood,” as he exclaimed in a sermon not long ago. He warns that the evil ones ruling the planet will someday be destroyed for their sins, while those who obey his admonishments (and tithe to his organization) will be saved.
Well aware of Mr. Farrakhan’s record, since both of them reside in Chicago, Mr. Obama forthrightly rejected the support of the unsavory minister. Unfortunately his own Christian pastor, Jeremiah Wright, has chosen to associate himself with the Nation of Islam, which may well create problems for the candidate—but at least Mr. Obama has clearly separated himself from the poisonous Farrakhan philosophy.
By contrast, Mr. McCain went out of his way last week to accept the endorsement of a Christian pastor with a deeply disturbing record of bigotry and extremism. That would be John Hagee, the San Antonio televangelist whose career is chronicled in God’s Profits: Faith, Fraud, and the Republican Crusade for Values Voters, a new book by investigative reporter Sarah Posner. As Ms. Posner reveals, Mr. Hagee is the kind of evangelical minister who has anticipated the end of the world for decades now, even as he promises untold riches to those who tithe to his ministry. He is an ardent warmonger who, like Mr. Farrakhan, seems to imagine a Middle East cleansed by blood—except that in his fantasies, the Christians will be saved while everyone else burns in the lake of fire. (The saved won’t include members of the Catholic Church, however, which he despises and denounces as venomously as Mr. Farrakhan does.)
But the perspectives of these two self-proclaimed men of God resemble each other even more closely in certain ways. He, too, promotes hatred of homosexuals and demands that women submit to men. And he, too, imagines a conspiracy by international bankers, the Bavarian Illuminati, the United Nations, the Council on Foreign Relations and other shadowy groups to deliver America into the hands of Satan. All that verbiage is merely code for traditional anti-Semitism, as Mr. Hagee surely knows because, like Mr. Farrakhan, he blames the Jewish people for their own persecution, including the Holocaust, as he explained a few years ago in a book titled Jerusalem Countdown.
Yet for reasons that seem more related to race than reason, the assorted inanities of Mr. Hagee are acceptable while those of Mr. Farrakhan are not, at least in the higher circles of the Republican Party and the national media. No matter how many times Mr. Obama rejects the Nation of Islam leader, a television anchor or a debate moderator will demand that he do so again, if only to mention their names in the same breath.
Meanwhile Mr. McCain continue to escape the hard questions that should be asked about his embrace of Mr. Hagee, whose ugly words and mad prophecies ought to repel him. Eight years ago, the San Antonio minister was among the political preachers, including Pat Robertson and the late Jerry Falwell, who denounced Mr. McCain and proclaimed George W. Bush to be the Lord’s chosen candidate.
Back then, the Arizona Republican proved his maverick courage when he rebuked them as “agents of intolerance.” He has sought to court their favor ever since—and it is sad to see him genuflect now to the same kind of demagogue he once mocked.

















You know, when Christians start flying planes into buildings and beheading folks, then I'll start to worry. Until then, Islam will remain the worst religion in the world.
Religion of peace my a$$.
Obama is going to have to answer for his association with his crazy a$$ pastor. The Republican dirty tricks play book is four inches thick.
renatam,
Please explain the difference between flying airliners into build and sending bomber fleets to kill millions of innocent civilians? Be they Christian, Muslim or Jew the followers of Yahweh, the bronze age god of wandering, barbarian, syphilitic, sheepherders are the strangest and bloodiest people on the planet. In fact, of all the followers of all the 2500 gods and goddesses that we've invented the followers of Yahweh are the worst in all of history!
Your Atheist pal,
Ernest
Renatam,
I'm not trying to knock you personally, but you painfully point out a major weakness of many of us here in the USA: we don't know our own history.
What we think of ourselves and the actual truth just doesn't line up. I'm not saying we should hate ourselves, I'm saying we should understand that we have, on many occasions, had incidents of brutality and murder of innocent people.
Just one example: after we won the Spanish-American war the Philippine people (a Spanish colony made up of good Christian people) justifiably expected that the USA - the leader of the "free" world - would free them from Spanish rule. Instead, we sent our warships across the world and killed tens of thousands of them to put down their bid for independence.
Ask yourself this: Did these people do anything to the USA? Did they threaten the USA? Should their homeland belong to USA?
If not, do you think killing people in an obviously weaker country that was no threat to us justified?
Just my humble opinion and something for you to think about.
I will think about your words. I do realize the US has had some imperial adventures, and while not on the scale of the murder and mayhem of European nations, still enough to make one cringe.
Come on folks get a clue...it's called "filthy lucre"...and no religon seems to be above cashing in on it..Osama bin Ladens' rich ass wasn't on any of the planes that crashed into te World Trade Center on 9/11!!
Seems the rich "worship" far differently than the poor..the poor can afford to die...and the rich can't!
McCain's embrace of the right wing televangalists is just one more in a long list of recent flip-flops. Just since becomming the Republican front runner, he has reversed himself on every issue he previously held that would have made consider voting for him. "Agents of intolerance", the Bush tax cuts for the rich, torture, to name a few.
Two Questions: Is there any issue John McCain hasn't been on both sides of, other than wanting to stay in Iraq forever? And will Tim Russert ever go after McCain on any of these issues the way he did with the ridiculous grilling he gave Obama over Farrrakhan in the last debate.
If you think John Hagee is an anti-semite, you must have had a monkey bang this trash out for you. Even the most cursory examination of Hagee would reveal this as pure myth. But then again, that's what liberals specialize in.
Hey Greg, like the "myth" that all the species of animal that exist in the world today walked off of Noah's ark 10,000 years ago? Or that Catholics practice cannibalism when they take communion? What kind of liberal myths, specifically, are you talking about?
It never fails to amase me how Cosason keeps trying to say that conservatives don't get any hard questions like the democrats. I think he must have lost his hearing when the liberals were being questened by the media all they con't was soft ball questions that a kinder garden student could anwser. The media is rollin g over for Obama and for Hilary and Obama
I am just waiting to see what kind of slanted article Joe is going to write about Elliott Spitzer. Should be a good one, giving his slanted views.
Tired: Joe will NOT write a "slanted" article. He will write the same article that he has always written, i.e.:
"Spitzer ( or other DEMOCRAT - insert name here ) may have done wrong, but it was ABOUT SEX, and accordingly NO ONE'S BUSINESS except his & the wifey's....
NEVER MIND that such lying bullshit is a 100% VALID reflection of the character of said democrat.... IT'S NOT IMPORTANT, because it's JUST ABOUT SEX !!!!
GOT IT ?
Joe can't help it, and wouldn't, if he could.
He's a Liberal/Socialist who STILL can't bring himself to admit that his Golden Boy ( an impeached, perjuring, adulterous, dis-barred socialist-accused-of-rape by several women ), did anything WRONG.
Airplanes, skyscrapers, and the unAmerican neo-fascist noise machine had not been invented when Christians participated in their own madness so many centuries ago.
ATHIESM, THE RELIGION OF DEMOCRATS, HAS KILLED ABOUT ONE HUNDRED MILLION.
MAKES RELIGOUS WARS LOOK PRETTY TAME IN COMPARISON.