The Media Mob

The Rising Cost of Launching a Magazine

The Rising Cost of Launching a Magazine
via portfolio.com

Earlier today, Media Mob looked at Richard Pérez-Peña's New York Times Sunday Business article about Condé Nast chairman Si Newhouse.

In that article, Mr. Pérez-Peña noted:

Last year, Condé introduced one of its most expensive new titles, Portfolio, its first business magazine, which company executives predict will lose $150 million or more before breaking even in four to five years.

The price tag for Porfolio just keeps going up, apparently. In April 2007, New York Magazine's Mark Fass wrote, that the magazine had "a reported budget of $125 million, it’s the most expensive launch Condé Nast has ever done."

Previously, the quote had been $100 million. Around the same time in 2007, Keith Kelly of The New York Post reported, "Before it turns a profit some years down the road, insiders are expecting it will cost Condé Nast Chairman S.I. Newhouse $100 million or more from the Newhouse family's multibillion dollar publishing empire."

But who can say exactly how much it will cost? A day after The Post reported that figure, The New York Times's Katharine Q. Seelye talked to the press-shy chairman of the company:

Mr. Newhouse said that his reported commitment to the magazine of more than $100 million over the next five years was 'something of a myth' because 'we’re going to stay with Portfolio.'

At those prices, he'd better.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

c.a. Marks (not verified) says:

The greedy get greedier. Someone needs to be fired, seriously.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Your comments are correct, but SI Newhouse owns the publishing house along with his family, and as long as the investors make money, his job is safe. He owns hundreds of newspapers, magazines, and other media outlets. Soldiers die, families struggle, food and gas prices skyrocket, and the wealthy could care less. If they paid their fair share of taxes, the deficit and our economy would be a lot more stable, but this is of no concern to those folks living the so-called glamorous life.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.