The Politicker

O-blammo!

Getty Images

Bill Richardson gave his speech.

"The national media has kinda put the Iraq war aside," he said at the New Hampshire State Democratic Party Dinner. (For the record, he'd like to have the troops home in a year.)

By the time he was wrapping up, railing about how the primary should be settled by the voters, not by the "national media," hundreds of Obama supporters had begun gathering near the stage, chanting and yelling.

Then: an eruption. The majority of the hall that holds the party dinner--the hall, a dome actually, is enormous, by the way--jumped to their feet for Obama. Definitely a minority were sitting.

"In four days you can do what Iowa did last night," he said, to roars.

The Clinton speech earlier in the program had been fairly standard stuff. ("Some people think you make change by demanding it, some people think you make change by hoping for it. I think you make change by working really hard.") And it was received as such.

Obama essentially re-delivered his Iowa victory speech. But batting cleanup, with the support of the majority of the crowd, the effect was drastically different:

"People say, Obama, he may talk good, he may have good ideas, He may want to be sure that every young person in America can afford college…. He may have the right idea when he says we can't just talk to our friends but talk to our enemies because that's what strong presidents and strong countries do… but they will say, Obama hasn't been in Washington long. He needs to be seasoned and stewed. We have to boil all the hope out of him. And you know--that argument didn't work in Iowa. And it's not going to work in New Hampshire. Because you know that the real gamble would be to have the same old game plan in Washington with the same players with the same result—that is a game we cannot afford, a risk we cannot take.

"I've been teased, even derided, for talking about hope so much. People will say ah, he's talking about hope again. His head is in the clouds. He's so idealistic. He's a hopemonger. And it's true…. The way folks talk about it now, they make it seem as if hope is a naïve thing. As if you're just going to be passive and engage in wishful thinking and expect the world to change without you rolling up your sleeves and doing something about it. You know what New Hampshire? That's not what hope means."

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

miked98b (not verified) says:

Great post. The more people who were there and write about what they saw, the more folks will recognize that the energy and enthusiasm that Obama's movement generates is real. Iowa was a watershed moment for Obama because it resolves the central nagging question that has kept many Clinton supporters from becoming Obama supporters: his electability. New Hampshire will be the second chapter in this historic campaign.

apeforobama (not verified) says:

Ooooobbaaammmmaaa!!!! President 44. If you liked the reign of James Earl Carter, you will love BHO's tenure. Oh happy day, super stagflation, international humiliation, and a budding socialist paradise. But however painful BHO's four--and only four--years, remember that the pain and humiliation of James Earl set the stage for the Reagan deliverance.

Timothy L. Pennell (not verified) says:

First of all. Could Gov. Doughboy, Bill Richardson, be any stupider. This guy is actually as DUMB as he looks. And he was Energy Sec. and U.N. Ambassador in the Clinton Administration. What does it say about a co-Presidency that would appoint this idiot to any other job beyond cleaning the ckalkboard erasers? As far as the rest of the article, Barak Obama. Let me REMIND everyone, just what kind of a person Barak Obama is. In the Illinois Senate he voted AGAINST funds that would be used to administer medical care for BABIES that had, somehow, survived an abortion. Let me say it again. While a State Senator, in Illinois, the woderfull and charismatic, Barak Obama, voted to turn his back on CHILDREN, on little BABIES, who had wanted to be born, so much, that they survived the attempt by a butcher, posing as a doctor, to murder them in the womb. Obama voted AGAINST helping them. Better to let them die, alone and afraid, than risk losing political support. This guy's a Christion? "You will be known by how you treat the least of MY children". And now YOU know, Barak Obama.

Harold Vick (not verified) says:

Objectives is good. How to's is better. He will make the Jimmy Carter leadership look inspired

kat (not verified) says:

Hillary is the best candidate for change clearly.
Our next president.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.