Close Stay up-to-date with
Observer.com Newsletters
Sign up for Observer Newsletters!
RSS Feed
The New York Observer

Sour Milk: Does Spirit Snub Mean Anything?

View Story On One Page View Story On One Page Print This Story Print This Story Share This Story Share This Story
December 3, 2008 | 8:41 a.m.
It does some bodies good!
It does some bodies good!

The Independent Spirit Awards or Film Independent's Spirit Awards, whatever title they're going by now always brings a smile to our face. That's probably because the producers have figured out what the producers of the Oscars are still trying to realize: taking an awards show seriously is a waste of time. So instead of tuxedos and stuffy montages on a Sunday night, the Spirit Awards treat us to jeans and parody songs about the nominees under the warm sun of a Saturday afternoon. This is something we can get behind. That being said, we never consider their nominations as any kind of precursor for the Academy Awards. But after the 2008 nominations were announced yesterday, we might have to change our minds. With neither a Best Director or Best Feature nomination amongst its four, perhaps Milk isn't the Oscar shoe-in everyone thought.

We won't even get into why Milk, with major stars, a top-level director and full Oscar campaign, is considered an independent film because arguing about what constitutes "independent" is like trying to figure out how to fix the economy. Suffice to say, in most previous circumstances a film like Milk would clean up at the Spirit Awards. Past Spirit winners include Oscar favorites like Pulp Fiction, Fargo, Lost in Translation and Juno. In fact, the Spirit Awards are usually considered the consolation prize; when Juno won last year, it was clear that Jason Reitman and company didn't have to worry about winning Best Picture the following night. Now Milk won't even get the chance for 2nd place.

Of course it's possible that the film will still get heaped with Oscar plaudits come January. The four nominations Milk received--for Best Actor, Supporting Actor, Screenplay and Cinematography  are all certainly likely (though we'd rather see Josh Brolin or Emile Hirsch get recognized in the supporting category and not the oddly flaccid James Franco). The blustery Oscar bloggers took Milk's slight as a mere oversight, or, the Spirit Awards' attempt at being "different". But isn't it possible that this was an indictment on the film? It wouldn't be the first time a critical smash was snubbed come Oscar time, though admittedly they do usually make it to the Oscars (see: Sideways). Perhaps Milk's exclusion from Best Feature and Director categories mean the film is going to be viewed as more of a performance piece by Academy voters. Or maybe it just didn't resonate. Either way, this is a slight. Though fear not Milk fans! Since it's early in the awards season, there is no need to cry over spilled... nah, we won't even bother.

Post a Comment The Discussion

Uiklyolip

order propecia - propecia order zithromax - zithromax buy xenical - xenical buy levitra - levitra buy ultram - ultram order fioricet - fioricet valium - valium acomplia online - acomplia prozac - prozac buy ativan - ativan

Gerilo lfruticulo

Thank you for the information

www.observer.com is very informative. The article is very professionally written. I enjoy reading www.observer.com every day. I was looking for the for the following services bad credit loans canada payday loans canadian payday loans cash advance loans faxless payday loans loans online payday loan online payday loans online payday loans canada payday payday advance payday loan payday loans pay day loans payday loans canada payday loans in canada payday loans online
payday loans ontario
and discovered that payday loans can help in times when your credit sucks, but you urgently need cash.

Post a Comment
Not a registered user? Register here.
Don't have an Observer.com account? You can use your Facebook account instead.