For Obama, This Loss Is Just a Loss

You can call Nevada a moral victory for Barack Obama, who trailed Hillary Clinton in the state by more than 20 points just a few weeks ago.
But moral victories are worthless at this point.
Obama needed a win in Nevada and he didn't get it. Now, even if she loses South Carolina to Obama next Saturday, Clinton will still be able to claim a split of the four pre-February 5 contests in the Democratic race.
Winning two of the four early states will more than satisfy the party establishment, a group that is magnetically attracted to safe choices. Most of the establishment has backed Clinton from the start of the campaign and Obama needed to deliver a series of early and decisive blows to jar them loose.
The party's rank-and-file masses, too, like to play follow-the-leader. Hillary's formidable edge in national polls and in big states (like California) can be directly attributed to the popular sense that she is "supposed" to win. Had she suffered a string of early defeats, those numbers would have melted away. Instead, she will now enter February 5—when nearly two dozen states will vote—as the same clear-cut favorite she was when she entered the race more than a year ago.
In fact, her win in Nevada today could be chalked up to the same phenomenon. Through all of 2007, she led the state by lopsided margins, the result of casual support from voters who knew her name and expected her to win. But Obama's Iowa win on January 3 established him as a viable contender, just as Hillary's third place finish threw her inevitability into question. Suddenly, the Nevada establishment—in the form of the Culinary Workers Union—felt emboldened enough to buck Hillary and endorse Obama. And rank-and-file voters suddenly had a change of heart, too: Hillary's giant lead vanished almost overnight.
Had she then lost New Hampshire, that Nevada trend would only have continued. More establishment support would have made its way to Obama, and even some of Hillary's establishment backers would have hedged their bets behind the scenes. And Obama, as the newly "inevitable" candidate, would have emerged as the clear leader in polls.
Instead, her New Hampshire win froze the mass movement to Obama, and her Nevada backers, instead of hedging their bets, dug their heels in. And now she has won two straight states and fully restored her imposing position, even if the road may be a little bumpier than originally expected. Now, it's hard to see how she loses her lead in states like California and New Jersey, no matter what happens in South Carolina next Saturday.





















Bingo!
Well written piece moulded on ubiased common sense.
This entire week has been crazy here in Nevada. The Culinary Union put on the full court press and failed to deliver the votes. The leaflets they distributed daily in the casino employee dining rooms were deplorable. They had their representatives out in force lying to and intimidating their members. Many of my co workers were told by Culinary employees and shop stewards in service to the Union that if they didn't vote for Obama, not to bother going to the caucus. It all culminated with the candidates then wanting to come into our lunch rooms to electioneer.
I, for one, am glad they are all gone and I prefer a primary system where it is nobody's business which candidate I choose to endorse and we can all vote without having to crowd into a hotel meeting room/convention space while I am supposed to be working to earn my living.
I agree this is a well written article, by Obama saying "it was just a loss", would be comparable to New England Patriots saying "it was just another loss" if somehow they lost in todays game which would cause them to not win the Super Bowl.
Perhaps Bill Clinton was right "Obama is living in a Fairy Tale World.
'This ain't Kansas TOTO'
He has to act like that now he doesn't want to appear to be a loser. It's all stratergy
Uh, Obama won Nevada. 13 delegates to Hillary's 12.
It will all come down in the end to the Electoral college...the DNC decision to shut out and ignore Michigan may come back to haunt them later..The dems have to get the those reagan democratic states. Obama or Hillary has to carry the states that Gore and Kerry lost particulary Tennessee. Translation Good Luck...In the end the Red states will remain red because someone will play the cards against either democratic candidate. It is a nice gesture to/and somewhat cliche to go a black church on MLK day however-There are are people who must understand that playing the cards are dicey...you play the race card you turn off the other race you play the sex card you turn off the other sex... the same way with Age-Young or Old and religion, etc.. The Nov election will be passionately brutal..You think the primaries are mean.
Yet another great article on the Dem race. Keep up with the common sense, objective coverage. PS Obama didn't win anything; the delegates will be apportioned later, and don't be surprised if they wind up tilting where they should - to support a very clear 6 point popular vote for Hillary.