Politics

Obama's New Challenge: Clinton's Push for V.P.

Obama's New Challenge: Clinton's Push for V.P.
Getty Images

Tuesday was supposed to be Barack Obama’s big day, and in many ways it was. Media outlets all over the world trumpeted his push past the magic number of 2,118 delegates and at long last he was able to declare – in the jam-packed St. Paul arena that will house this summer’s Republican National Convention – that the Democratic nomination was his.

And yet for much of the day and night, the airwaves were consumed with talk about his apparently vanquished opponent and her decision to tell a group of supporters via conference call that she’d be receptive to serving as Obama’s running-mate.

Clinton is an unusually disciplined politician, expert at the art of avoiding, sidestepping or ignoring questions that she’d prefer not to answer. She did not have to respond directly when the V.P. subject was raised on the conference call, and by answering as she did – telling her supporters that “I’d be open to it” – she was surely aware of what would happen next.

As soon as the call ended, word leaked to the news media. CNN interrupted its programming with a bulletin about Clinton’s sudden readiness to join forces with Obama. Clinton supporters – including those on the call, like Charlie Rangel and Jose Serrano – touted her statement and talked publicly of the incomparable value she’d supposedly bring to an Obama-led ticket. And pundits hashed over the subject of the “dream ticket” for hours, with more than a few wondering aloud whether Obama really has any choice but to offer the spot to Clinton.

The coverage underscored two realities as the Democratic race enters its Veepstakes phase.

One is the trouble Obama would be inviting for himself by handing the vice-presidency to Hillary (and Bill, for that matter). If they were to win election as a team, Obama may have witnessed on Tuesday a preview of his vice-president’s willingness to skillfully shift the spotlight away from him and to herself in pursuit of her own agenda. And this all came a day after Bill Clinton won international attention for his assault on a magazine writer. Would a President Barack Obama want to enable such distractions at the highest levels of his own administration?

More significantly, though, Clinton’s V.P. trial balloon suggested a revealing strategic calculation on her part. Not only does she apparently want the No. 2 spot – a matter of fierce debate these past few weeks – but she also doesn’t seem to think she can secure it by traditional means. That is to say, those who covet the V.P. spot typically engage in a familiar dance, showering the presidential nominee with praise and support and denying – at all times – that the vice-presidency is on their mind at all.

This ritual is even more important when the V.P. aspirant ran against the presidential candidate in the primary season. Just consider the dramatic shift in Mitt Romney’s tone toward John McCain since withdrawing from the Republican race. In many ways, the former Massachusetts governor waged a cutthroat campaign against McCain during the primaries – prompting several cutting and highly personal rebukes from McCain. But since leaving the race, Romney has not only endorsed McCain, he’s hit the road on his behalf, raising money for him, speaking on his behalf, defending him on television and even making a personal trip to his Arizona home just two weeks ago.

In the process, he has slowly built good will – or at least lessened some of the bad will -- with McCain and his team and has generated support among influential party leaders for his V.P. candidacy. Of course, anytime Romney is asked if he’s interested in being on the ticket, he laughs and pretends it’s a far-fetched question. In other words, he’s waging a textbook campaign for the V.P. slot.

It’s the same route that George H.W. Bush – the last primary season runner-up to win a spot on the fall ticket – took in 1980. In the primaries, he branded Ronald Reagan’s tax-cut plan “voodoo economics.” But as Reagan pulled away in the delegate race, Bush changed course. After scoring a surprise win in Michigan that May, Bush nonetheless withdrew from the race, advised by his campaign manager (Jim Baker) that it was time to start worrying about getting on Reagan’s good side. Two months later, Bush and Reagan were joining hands in Detroit.

But Clinton signaled on Tuesday that she doesn’t believe she can – or doesn’t believe she should have to – build up Obama’s comfort with the idea of her as his vice-president. Instead, she seems interested in winning the job through pressure. The media firestorm she created on Tuesday will only intensify, as long as she keeps skillfully fanning the flames. It will dominate the news for weeks. Her supporters, at least some of them, will shift the zeal they directed toward her presidential candidacy (and toward the Michigan-Florida fiasco, for that matter) into her push for Obama’s No. 2 slot.

This kind of heavy-handed strategy has been tried before, but never by someone who had a plausible chance of landing on the ticket in the first place. It was, for instance, the course that Jesse Jackson adopted in the spring and summer of 1988. Time and again, he told anyone who’d listen that he felt Michael Dukakis owed him by V.P. slot by virtue of Jackson’s second-place finish in that primary season. This posturing put Dukakis in an uncomfortable position. He never had any intention of putting Jackson on the ticket, but it couldn’t look this way, lest an irate Jackson lead a convention walk-out or – worse – urge his supporters to stay home in the fall.

But Hillary Clinton, obviously, isn’t Jesse Jackson. Dukakis managed to string Jackson along without much incident (although he bungled his final decision to pick Lloyd Bentsen, which a furious Jackson learned of from the press), but if Clinton persists in playing the V.P. card, we will be in uncharted territory. After a summer-long campaign for the spot, how would Clinton’s 1,900 or so delegates – not to mention her 18 million or so voters – react to a snub?

For Obama, it could be a nightmare calculation, trying to determine which would be worse: the problems caused by leaving Clinton off the ticket or the problems caused by having her looking over his shoulder as vice president.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Anonymous (not verified) says:

There is not a snowball's cahnce in hell that Obama will choose Hillary as VP. If she persists in this mad dance, she will do some damage to Obama and the Democratic party, but she will destroy her standing in politics. The notion that she has an army of supporters at her beck and call is just that -- an illusion. Her followers now are vehement, but that is a short-lived emotion.

Hillary is a DIRTBAG OLDBAG ... (not verified) says:

.
HILLARY IS A DIRTBAG WHO REFUSED, LAST NIGHT, TO CONGRATULATE THE PARTY'S FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN NOMINEE.

HILLARY IS SCUM AND CANNOT BE OBAMA'S VP.

OBAMA DON'T NEED HILLARY'S SUPPORT TO BEAT MCCAIN. THAT IS THE REAL 'FAIRYTALE.'

------------------------------------------------------------

Be nice to her, respect her, nod your head a few times, make sure you look like you are listening to her, demure about the VP question as long as you can, dangle the promise of a Cabinet post for her or even a leadership role in the campaign for the faithful husband, and then when you are sworn in, Barack, only then, will it be safe to ignore her.

Once they lose their grip on the Party, everyone will turn on them. Even her so-called supporters are waiting for that glorious day of your historic Inauguration. On that day, finally, they will be able to do to that lovely couple from Arkansas what they've done to the Party and the country.

Karma can be a b*tch.

Robert7 (not verified) says:

The above comment openly suggests that Obama should have gotten special consideration from Clinton solely because he's black, proving once again that the chief liberal motive in this primary season has been to elect a negro at all costs.

The fringe liberals have no interest in actually solving the problems that affect the greatest number of Americans, such as health care, job creation and retention, border enforcement, etc. Their agenda is confined to the quixotic social causes of rich liberal ideologues and racist blacks.

Had the fringe liberals an opportunity to nominate a black woman, they'd have preferred her to Obama. And had they a chance to nominate a black woman who was also a lesbian, they'd have preferred her to the black heterosexual woman. And had they a chance to vote for a black lesbian who is a former crack addict, they'd have preferred her to the black lesbian who never took drugs. And had they a chance to vote for a black lesbian crack addict who is an illegal alien, they'd have preferred her to the black lesbian crack addict who was a U.S. citizen. And had they a chance to vote for a black lesbian crack addict and illegal alien who also liked to fuck golden retrievers, they'd prefer her to the black lesbian crack addict and illegal alien who didn't like to bang dogs.

I'm a Republican, so yes, I would prefer a black woman: Condi Rice. Of course, barring that, any illiterate, racist white man will be fine, too.

Please leave our party and vote for Bob Barr. We've had enough of people like you wrecking things for the past generation. Haven't you heard? The Goldwater coalition is dead. Now, a few years in the wilderness, and we can rebuild the party, as it was meant to be. (Haven't you heard? Republicans are the natural elitists.)

I'm ashamed that we must count the Idiot Son as an alumnus of our fine university. But he was a legacy. What's Harvard's excuse?

IS IT WITCHCRAFT or VOODOO? (not verified) says:

HILLARY HAS BROUGHT OUT THE WORST IN ALL OF US.
-------------------------------------------------------

Rick (not verified) says:

Melancholy Korean,

Were you drunk when you wrote that? Speaking of illiterate...

marianne (not verified) says:

i hope she knows exactly what 'going away' entails. this drama and subsequent power plays have done nothing but hurt the party overall.

i don't buy the 'she toughened him up' for the general argument. she helped create the talking points that the republicans will use against him in the general while simultaneously turning older white women and the working class against him.

as for vp, she represents everything he abhors, old politics personified... he could no more choose her than he could john mccain.

marianne thompson (not verified) says:

i hope she knows exactly what 'going away' entails. this drama and subsequent power plays have done nothing but hurt the party overall.

i don't buy the 'she toughened him up' for the general argument. she helped create the talking points that the republicans will use against him in the general while simultaneously turning older white women and the working class against him.

as for vp, she represents everything he abhors, old politics personified... he could no more choose her than he could john mccain.

No Hillary as VP (not verified) says:

NO TO HILLARY AS OBAMA’S VP RUNNING MATE.

SATURDAY WE WILL SEE HILLARY ON HER KNEES PRAISING OBAMA AND AUDITIONING FOR THE VP SLOT… THERE IS NO WAY SHE WILL GET PICKED BY OBAMA … BUT IT WILL BE FUN WATCHING HER TRY TO WEASEL AND WHINE HER WAY ONTO HIS TICKET …

THE “ENTITLEMENT QUEEN” WILL BE HUMBLED AS SHE SHOULD BE….

HILLARY WILL FINALLY HAVE TO SAY … “NO MAS; NO MAS; THE FAT LADY SANG.”

==============================================================

M.A. George (not verified) says:

Hillary's performance Tuesday night gave Obama and us all a pretty good picture of what kind of VP she would be. Not a "V" at all--always pushing and confronting and objecting and showboating and pushing her own agenda. Nightmare for any president. Obama would have to really keep her in a muzzle and chokechain just to be his own man in the White House. Then watch her whine and cry sexism. HRC as VP is trouble, trouble, trouble. And I don't even mention Bill roaming around the EOB! There's another story.

BILL CLINTON COST HILLARY THE NOMINATION (not verified) says:

.
DID BILL CLINTON COST HILLARY THE NOMINATION?
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT.

THINK OF THE NUMBERS… HILLARY’S DOWNWARD SLIDE FOR ELECTED DELEGATES BEGAN RIGHT AFTER BILL CLINTON STARTED MAKING RACE RELATED REMARKS IN SOUTH CAROLINA.
HILLARY LOST BY ONLY A NARROW MARGIN OF DELEGATES… IT IS NOT HARD TO SEE THAT IF BILL CLINTON HAD NOT STARTED WITH HIS BIG MOUTH THAT HILLARY WOULD HAVE EARNED ENOUGH DELEGATES TO WIN THIS NOMINATION…

EVEN AT THE TIME WHEN THE SUPERDELEGATES WERE MAKING THEIR FINAL CRUCIAL DECISIONS ON WHO TO SUPPORT — BIG MOUTH BILL WAS CALLING A JOURNALIST A “SCUMBAG” ON NATIONAL TV.

ANY ONE WHO DOUBTS THAT ‘BILL CLINTON’ COST HILLARY THIS NOMINATION — IS LOOKING IN THE WRONG PLACE FOR EXCUSES.
________________________________________________________________________________

MLA (not verified) says:

History is repeating its self again because in
1960 JFK had no plans for LBJ as VP!but he picked
him anyway because he new he had to have LBJ for
the southern Vote!and that great state of Texas!.
So if Obama wants to get the white house job then
he sure as hell better pick Miss Clinton because
she won the states that you have to win in order
to get elected as President!and like JFK was Obama
is in the same place he needs the her votes!and
the Country needs her strong leadership as the next
VP of the US!.

MLA.

Hillary is nuts (not verified) says:

Thank God Hillary wasn't nominated...the woman is psycho...

Drupal Berlin (not verified) says:

"I think he should want to run a clean sort of Barack Obama campaign, I think, to maximize change. And I think that, quite frankly, a lot of people think that they, combined, would be a drag on change. So he may, in the final analysis, be forced to take her because of this campaign and because of the need for party unity, but I think it’s going to be a terribly difficult decision on both sides and will continue a lot of the politics that we have seen, and then perhaps a lot of the tension and emotion."
RON WALTERS on http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/4/america_this_is_our_moment_sen

Keith Halloran New York, NY (not verified) says:

If Obama has balls, he will pick Hillary Clinton as his VP and keep her, and Bill, on a VERY short leash.

That is the only way he can assure solid form UNITY among Democrats - get it over with, so he can focus on McCain. Until he picks his VP, THAT will be TOPIC#1 - and Hillary will enjoy ALL the attention!

Your move, Barry ....

Jeugenen (not verified) says:

HILLARY PROPOSES MARRIAGE TO OBAMA

The desperate Leiberman Neo-Liberals now propose a political marriage between their loser, Princess Hillary; and the winner, Kennedy Liberal Obama. But expulsion, not inclusion, is the key to restoring traditional Liberal values to the Democratic Party.

So the Last Gate for Hillary Rodham and William Jefferson, the notorious Leiberman Neo-Lib crooks, shall be Hellsgate. The victorious Kennedy Liberals shall burn Neo-Lib Princess Hillary at the stake, for notorious treason against Christian Culture and Constitutional Rule.

The World will be cheering; American will be singing, “God Bless America”; and no one will hear the screams of the Mexican aliens, the Chinese spies, the Israeli Judeofascists, the corporate cheaters, and her notorious following of morally degenerate fools.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Hillary deserves to be vp she has fought hard and she brings a lot to democratic party, this kind of talk is not uniting. when the clinton's were in office that was the best time for usa. low gas prices, economy good, budget balanced, every country loved us and them, no wars,everything was good (except bill was a bad boy ,but very good president)

Anonymous (not verified) says:

shame on you. you shouldn't even mention christianity in your message because christians i know sure don't talk about anyone like that especially our leaders. the clinton's have did a lot for a lot of people and different races probably yours too.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

i only hope obama is reading this so he can see what kind of people are following him. the things i am reading here is horrific and i only hope this isn't what we have to look forward too. so much hate and anger and i will bet not one of you really knows the clintons. and most of all you don't know obama either because he hasn't been around very long. so good luck with that

Anonymous (not verified) says:

wrong wrong wrong, we need the clinton's power in the white house. they are great leaders, if they show to be stronger than obama thats not their fault and if he wants to be the president he shouldn't even worry about it. why do you think he needs you to take up for him???

Anonymous (not verified) says:

shame on you

Hope is Not A Foreign Policy (not verified) says:

The most solemn responsibility of the President of the United States is that of commander-in-chief. This is an interesting article by Kornacki, as it examines in depth a problem that will continue to plague Sen. Obama throughout this campaign and may eventually cost him the White House.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.