Bloomberg and the Referendum Deadline
One of the main arguments being marshaled against Michael Bloomberg's bid to change the term-limits law—in several notable cases by opponents who have never before taken such a keen interest in the merits of government-by-plebiscite—is that undoing the results of a public referendum by Council legislation is undemocratic.
Bloomberg's preemptive (and very convenient) counterargument is that it's too late now to put it on the ballot for November. Here are two instances of Bloomberg discussing his timing.
At the first event, an October 2 press conference, Bloomberg said he would have liked to put term limits on the ballot, but there is no longer enough time.
The second clip, from an October 10 press conference, Bloomberg says he was too busy to put together the charter revision commission that he announced in January—a move that would have ensured that term limits made it onto the ballot this year.
- More:
- Politics |
- Michael Bloomberg |
- Politics Daily |
- Term Limits



Suddenly, a Trillion Is Too Much?
Touré Writing Book About 'Post-Blackness' For Free Press
The Week in Interviews: Megan Fox on Genius, Bubbles in Retirement, and a HuffPo Reporter Calls Someone 'Pathetic'
Are Danes and Dancy the New Tinz and Topper?
Opening this Weekend: Celebrate July 4th with Johnny Depp in a Fedora and Those Cute Critters from Ice Age!
The Attorney General Isn't Doing Politics
The Gay Movement, After Marriage