Close Stay up-to-date with
Observer.com Newsletters
Sign up for Observer Newsletters!
RSS Feed
The New York Observer

Bloomberg and the Referendum Deadline

View Story On One Page View Story On One Page Print This Story Print This Story Share This Story Share This Story
October 13, 2008 | 9:04 a.m.

One of the main arguments being marshaled against Michael Bloomberg's bid to change the term-limits law—in several notable cases by opponents who have never before taken such a keen interest in the merits of government-by-plebiscite—is that undoing the results of a public referendum by Council legislation is undemocratic.

Bloomberg's preemptive (and very convenient) counterargument is that it's too late now to put it on the ballot for November. Here are two instances of Bloomberg discussing his timing.

At the first event, an October 2 press conference, Bloomberg said he would have liked to put term limits on the ballot, but there is no longer enough time.

The second clip, from an October 10 press conference, Bloomberg says he was too busy to put together the charter revision commission that he announced in January—a move that would have ensured that term limits made it onto the ballot this year.

Post a Comment The Discussion