San Francisco as New York's Future? Don't Go There
By Tom Acitelli
October 13, 2008 | 8:09 a.m.
"Don't be fooled by the postcards your friends send you. The rich and the poor are basically all that remain here. Few poor own any form of real estate so they're not contributing in the way of property taxes. The 20-something students certainly aren't contributing to this place. It's a topsy-turvy town right now. Generally, only the affluent own real estate or those who purchased it eons ago. ... Tourism is the primary reason SF exists today and that's becoming increasingly difficult to maintain. I don't see how NY could use SF as a model. Ironically, many San Franciscans look to NY as a model." ["Should New York Look to (Urp!) San Fran?"]
- More:
- Real Estate |
- Joel Kotkin |
- San Francisco |
- The Real Estate



Suddenly, a Trillion Is Too Much?
Touré Writing Book About 'Post-Blackness' For Free Press
The Week in Interviews: Megan Fox on Genius, Bubbles in Retirement, and a HuffPo Reporter Calls Someone 'Pathetic'
Are Danes and Dancy the New Tinz and Topper?
Inside Nicholas Cage's Museum Tower Condo
Original Real Estate Stories This Week on Observer.com
Bike Community Goes After John Liu Over Yassky's Bill