Romney Decries Democrats, 'Evil Extremism' in Withdrawal Speech

Mitt Romney just withdrew from the race for the Republican presidential nomination after a poor showing in the Super Tuesday primaries—he won the states he has lived in and a series of not particularly contested caucuses.
In his speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference, Romney noted that he "hates to lose" but is withdrawing because "If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win."
He also said, "we cannot allow the next President of the United States to retreat in the face evil extremism!!"
Full text of the speech, as prepared for delivery:
I want to begin by saying thank you. It’s great to be with you again. And I look forward to joining with you many more times in the future.
Last year, CPAC gave me the sendoff I needed. I was in single digits in the polls and I was facing household Republican names. As of today, more than 4 million people have given me their vote for president, less than Senator McCain’s 4.7 million, but quite a statement nonetheless. 11 states have given me their nod, compared to his 13. Of course, because size does matter, he’s doing quite a bit better with his number of delegates.
To all of you, thank you for caring enough about the future of America to show up, stand up and speak up for conservative principles.
As I said to you last year, conservative principles are needed now more than ever. We face a new generation of challenges, challenges which threaten our prosperity, our security and our future. I am convinced that unless America changes course, we will become the France of the 21st century—still a great nation, but no longer the leader of the world, no longer the superpower. And to me, that is unthinkable. Simon Peres, in a visit to Boston, was asked what he thought about the war in Iraq. “First,” he said, “I must put something in context. America is unique in the history of the world. In the history of the world, whenever there has been conflict, the nation that wins takes land from the nation that loses. One nation in history, and this during the last century, laid down hundreds of thousands of lives and took no land. No land from Germany, no land from Japan, no land from Korea. America is unique in the sacrifice it has made for liberty, for itself and for freedom loving people around the world.” The best ally peace has ever known, and will ever know, is a strong America!
And that is why we must rise to the occasion, as we have always done before, to confront the challenges ahead. Perhaps the most fundamental of these is the attack on the American culture.
Over the years, my business has taken me to many countries. I have been struck by the enormous differences in the wealth and well-being of people of different nations. I have read a number of scholarly explanations for the disparities. I found the most convincing was that written by David Landes, a professor emeritus from Harvard University. I presume he’s a liberal--I guess that’s redundant. His work traces the coming and going of great civilizations throughout history. After hundreds of pages of analysis, he concludes with this:
If we learn anything from the history of economic development, it is that culture makes all the difference. Culture makes all the difference.
What is it about American culture that has led us to become the most powerful nation in the history of the world? We believe in hard work and education. We love opportunity: almost all of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants who came here for opportunity—opportunity is in our DNA. Americans love God, and those who don’t have faith, typically believe in something greater than themselves—a “Purpose Driven Life.” And we sacrifice everything we have, even our lives, for our families, our freedoms and our country. The values and beliefs of the free American people are the source of our nation’s strength and they always will be!
The threat to our culture comes from within. The 1960’s welfare programs created a culture of poverty. Some think we won that battle when we reformed welfare, but the liberals haven’t given up. At every turn, they try to substitute government largesse for individual responsibility. They fight to strip work requirements from welfare, to put more people on Medicaid, and to remove more and more people from having to pay any income tax whatsoever. Dependency is death to initiative, risk-taking and opportunity. Dependency is a culture-killing drug—we have got to fight it like the poison it is!
The attack on faith and religion is no less relentless. And tolerance for pornography—even celebration of it—and sexual promiscuity, combined with the twisted incentives of government welfare programs have led to today’s grim realities: 68% of African American children are born out-of-wedlock, 45% of Hispanic children, and 25% of White children. How much harder it is for these children to succeed in school—and in life. A nation built on the principles of the founding fathers cannot long stand when its children are raised without fathers in the home.
The development of a child is enhanced by having a mother and father. Such a family is the ideal for the future of the child and for the strength of a nation. I wonder how it is that unelected judges, like some in my state of Massachusetts, are so unaware of this reality, so oblivious to the millennia of recorded history. It is time for the people of America to fortify marriage through constitutional amendment, so that liberal judges cannot continue to attack it!
Europe is facing a demographic disaster. That is the inevitable product of weakened faith in the Creator, failed families, disrespect for the sanctity of human life and eroded morality. Some reason that culture is merely an accessory to America’s vitality; we know that it is the source of our strength. And we are not dissuaded by the snickers and knowing glances when we stand up for family values, and morality, and culture. We will always be honored to stand on principle and to stand for principle.
The attack on our culture is not our sole challenge. We face economic competition unlike anything we have ever known before. China and Asia are emerging from centuries of poverty. Their people are plentiful, innovative, and ambitious. If we do not change course, Asia or China will pass us by as the economic superpower, just as we passed England and France during the last century. The prosperity and security of our children and grandchildren depend on us.
Our prosperity and security also depend on finally acting to become energy secure. Oil producing states like Russia and Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Iran are siphoning over $400 billion per year from our economy—that’s almost what we spend annually for defense. It is past time for us to invest in energy technology, nuclear power, clean coal, liquid coal, renewable sources and energy efficiency. America must never be held hostage by the likes of Putin, Chavez, and Ahmendinejad.
And our economy is also burdened by the inexorable ramping of government spending. Don’t focus on the pork alone—even though it is indeed irritating and shameful. Look at the entitlements. `They make up 60% of federal spending today. By the end of the next President’s second term, they will total 70%. Any conservative plan for the future has to include entitlement reform that solves the problem, not just acknowledges it.
Most politicians don’t seem to understand the connection between our ability to compete and our national wealth, and the wealth of our families. They act as if money just happens--that it’s just there. But every dollar represents a good or service produced in the private sector. Depress the private sector and you depress the well-being of Americans.
That’s exactly what happens with high taxes, over-regulation, tort windfalls, mandates, and overfed, over-spending government. Did you see that today, government workers make more money than people who work in the private sector. Can you imagine what happens to an economy where the best opportunities are for bureaucrats?
It’s high time to lower taxes, including corporate taxes, to take a weed-whacker to government regulations, to reform entitlements, and to stand up to the increasingly voracious appetite of the unions in our government!
And finally, let’s consider the greatest challenge facing America—and facing the entire civilized world: the threat of violent, radical Jihad. In one wing of the world of Islam, there is a conviction that all governments should be destroyed and replaced by a religious caliphate. These Jihadists will battle any form of democracy—to them, democracy is blasphemous for it says that citizens, not God shape the law. They find the idea of human equality to be offensive. They hate everything we believe about freedom just as we hate everything they believe about radical Jihad.
To battle this threat, we have sent the most courageous and brave soldiers in the world. But their numbers have been depleted by the Clinton years when troops were reduced by 500,000, when 80 ships were retired from the Navy, and when our human intelligence was slashed by 25%. We were told that we were getting a peace dividend. We got the dividend, but we didn’t get the peace. In the face of evil in radical Jihad and given the inevitable military ambitions of China, we must act to rebuild our military might. Raise military spending to 4% of our GDP, purchase the most modern armament, re-shape our fighting forces for the asymmetric demands we now face, and give the veterans the care they deserve!
Soon, the face of liberalism in America will have a new name. Whether it is Barack or Hillary, the result would be the same if they were to win the Presidency. The opponents of American culture would push the throttle, devising new justifications for judges to depart from the constitution. Economic neophytes would layer heavier and heavier burdens on employers and families, slowing our economy and opening the way for foreign competition to further erode our lead.
Even though we face an uphill fight, I know that many in this room are fully behind my campaign.” You are with me all the way to the convention. Fight on, just like Ronald Reagan did in 1976. But there is an important difference from 1976: today... we are a nation at war.
And Barack and Hillary have made their intentions clear regarding Iraq and the war on terror. They would retreat and declare defeat. And the consequence of that would be devastating. It would mean attacks on America, launched from safe havens that make Afghanistan under the Taliban look like child’s play. About this, I have no doubt.
I disagree with Senator McCain on a number of issues, as you know. But I agree with him on doing whatever it takes to be successful in Iraq, on finding and executing Osama bin Laden, and on eliminating Al Qaeda and terror. If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.
This is not an easy decision for me. I hate to lose. My family, my friends and our supporters... many of you right here in this room... have given a great deal to get me where I have a shot at becoming President. If this were only about me, I would go on. But I entered this race because I love America, and because I love America, I feel I must now stand aside, for our party and for our country.
I will continue to stand for conservative principles; I will fight alongside you for all the things we believe in. And one of those things is that we cannot allow the next President of the United States to retreat in the face evil extremism!!
It is the common task of each generation—and the burden of liberty—to preserve this country, expand its freedoms and renew its spirit so that its noble past is prologue to its glorious future.
To this task... accepting this burden... we are all dedicated, and I firmly believe, by the providence of the Almighty, that we will succeed beyond our fondest hope. America must remain, as it has always been, the hope of the earth.
Thank you, and God bless America.


















What a shame. We've missed a golden opportunity to put this country back on the right path.
Mr. Romney talks about the tolerance of pornography, and then earlier in his speech interjects the conflicting statement about how size does matter. This is amusing! This phrase is usually viewed and interpreted in a sexual way. Not always, but usually.
"Size does matter" is generally regarded as a phrase validating large genitalia. The origins of this phrase are indeed sexual, and the phrase is usually viewed in a sexual way. "Size does matter" is a very, very, very, very poor choice of words for Romney. I did find this phrase rather odd, and amusing for a devout Mormon.
Romney states: "Conservative principles are needed now more than ever." This is laughable, too. This statement defies logic after seven years of radical conservatism. No, Mr. Romney, liberal principles are needed now more than ever. George W. Bush didn't have the mandate to take this country to the far right. Indeed, this political decision was a miscalculated blunder by George W. Bush. Of course, most of George W. Bush's political decisions were miscalculated blunders.
It's rather strange that Mr. Romney's negative view of homosexuality mirrors America's negative view of the LDS religion.
Part of the reason Mr. Romney's presidential bid was a failure from the start is due to his Mormon faith. Mr. Romney is casting stones at a segment of society, homosexuals, just like non-enlightened Americans are casting stones at another segment of society, Mormons. It's so sad. Why can't all segments of society be treated as equals? Tolerance is not alive and well in America, and Mr. Romney paid the price for being different. If you are different, you do pay a price.
As of yet, Mormons are not presidential timber. As of yet, out of the closet homosexuals are not presidential timber.
Oddly enough, I view Mr. Romney's political views as evil extremism. I'm glad Mr. Romney is packing his bags and going home. BTW, his bags are quite heavy, because he carries a lot of baggage-- extremist, twisted, political views.
HEY zACH. SIZE DOES MATTER. YOU SEE HOW I CAPITALIZED YOUR NAME. YOU SPEND TOO MUCH TIME IN SELF ABUSE. HAH.
Anonymous,
Thanks so much. I'm feeling bigger already, and I'll be measuring up to every Tom, Dick, and Harry.
Hey Zack,
Comparing a Morman to a homosexual is just plain foolish.
Anyway, I would rather have a Mormon as a neighbor than a gay, would rather have my kids influneced by Mormon vlaues than homosexual values.
Homosexuals in America dont want tolerance, they already have that..they want acceptance, acceptance as a normal way of life. Homosexuality is not normal, it is deviant from the norm. Homosexuals want outer acceptance because they are conflicted within and at a subconscious level dont accept it in themselves so they look for it from society..a very unhealthy way of getting ones needs met.
Duke,
First of all, having little contact with gays and lesbians is going to keep you misinformed. Every person in America socializes with gays and lesbians on a daily basis, but people don't wear signs labeling themselves as straight and gay.
Many gays and lesbians are married, and are deep in the closet. They may be living a straight lifestyle in suburbia, but that doesn't negate the fact that their sexual orientation is homosexual.
It's hard to make a blanket statement about acceptance and tolerance. It varies a great deal. Of course, most liberal, big cities are more tolerant than conservative rural areas. Many large companies are now gay-friendly, and offer health benefits to the companions of their gay employees.
Gays and lesbians are stepping up the corporate ladder in huge numbers, and it's changing the power structure. I think heterosexuals may be jealous and envious. Companies have found gays and lesbians to be much more productive then their straight employees. Our problem-solving skills are exceptional, because most of us have dealt with adversity all of our lives. I have.
However, I'm still waiting for the great job at the top of the corporate ladder. I may have to sleep with the boss to get it.
What you must realize is that diversity defines humanity. Not everyone has blue eyes, blonde hair, and is gorgeous. People don't choose their skin color, the length of their index finger, or their sexual orientation. I like Chinese food, but you may like Italian food.
Staying married for 25-years is not the norm. Some people are really rotten, so that makes this thing called romance tough.
Many, many, many, many, many, many years ago some straight men may have preferred Mormon neighbors. Why not? Some Mormon men had 10 wives. No doubt a few of them were hot babes. Hot babes giving the horses a bath in back yard might provide a good view from the bedroom window.
I'm a Mormon, and one of my best friends is gay. I know that he is a man who sees himself as different, but longs to be straight. There is a definite conflict within a gay person's mind about their sexual orientation. The body was designed specifically for sexual reproduction, and that doesn't happen male-male or female-female, but solely in a heterosexual relationship.
In the business world, I don't care if a person is gay, lesbian, or straight, I just want to see that the person does his or her job right and well. That goes the same for the different races. We are all the same, mentally.
The sexes and races do have unique physical characteristics. Men are generally stronger than women. Blacks are generally faster and stronger than Whites. Does this give reason for discrimination? No, it doesn't. (Except in sports, because we all know that "white men can't jump.")
These differences are not something that a person can choose--the roots lie in our DNA. Sexual orientation, however, is a choice that a person makes. A gay or lesbian relationship is NOT natural, but a habit that can be overcome. Granted, it may be hard after time, but it still can. My friend has worked for years to overcome the choice he made in his teens to be gay, and now he has those years to erase from his habits. Just as a smoker has an addiction, so has my friend an addiction of sorts to men.
As to gays and lesbians working their way up the corporate ladder, great: they are people with skills just as the rest of us. Why shouldn't they be rewarded? Minority races are seeing the same thing. But do we have to discriminate in favor of gays and minorities to prove that we aren't racist or homophobic? No, we don't. BTW, can I see a citation for your statement, Zach, that "Companies have found gays and lesbians to be much more productive then their straight employees." I contest that no person is a stronger worker because of their sexual orientation or any other factor besides the person's upbringing and personal values.
Mitt Romney is a funny one.
Always complaining about pornography.
If my memory serves me, the Marriott hotel chain has many pornographic movies offered, for a fee, in all their rooms around the world.
From my memory, I can pull the fact out that, Mitt and Marriott are very close.
Do the research.
Any candidate that uses their religion as a "selling point" is not a good American, in fact, I would say it could be treason.
Lying to the American public is not a good way to run America, we have learned that, most recently because of the current Fundamental Christian in the White House's administration and circle of friends who support the rape of the world, for their desire of power and greed.
I won’t blame any Middle Easterner, or any other person from any other country for that matter, to want to fly a plane into the White House, the Pentagon, or any other building in America.
The "war" we are paying for in money and blood, is being done in, NOT the name of "freedom" or "Democracy" but in "USA Christianity".
This is the enemy.
Corey Mondello
Boston, Massachusetts
www.CoreyMondello.com
2-8-08
ps
For those who disagree, do some research on what the Founding Fathers envisioned when it came to creating a country where everyone was free to practice their religion, or have no religion, without the state or government stepping in.
Taxes are NOT supposed to be used to support any singular religion.
Again, religion is the enemy.
Other civilized countries laugh at us, especially at this time, when they hear all this chitter chatter about god, when it comes to the presidential hopefuls.
Also, these civilized countries don't owe other countries trillions of dollars. They also have better health care, less infant deaths, less alcoholism and drug abuse, less gun laws with less gun crimes, healthier environments...and these are just a few to mention.
To those who will say; "Then go live in another country!"
My response to you; "NO!, this is MY country, and I want it back, or at least on the track it was meant to be on before the fundamental religious murderers took it over!"
HILLARY’S GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE ADVANTAGE
Whitewater, Cattle Futuregate, Travelgate, Gennifer Flowersgate, Filegate, Vince Fostergate, Whitewater Billing Recordsgate, Paula Jonesgate, Federal Building Campaign Phone Callgate, Lincoln Bedroomgate, Donations from Convicted Drug and Weapons Dealersgate, Buddhist Templegate, Lippogate, Chinagate, Lewinsky Affair, Perjury and Jobs for Lewinskygate, Willeygate, Web Hubbel Prison Phone Callgate, Selling Military Technology to the Chinesegate, Wag the Doggate, Juanita Broaddrickgate, Vandalgate, Lootergate, Pardongate; and the many deaths, including suicide, murder, and mysterious gun shots to the head, all allegedly linked to Clinton.
Israel for military protection, China for military secrets, and Mexico for amnesty most desperately need Hillary for president.
Google: “boycott liberalism Clinton Legacy”; “Danneymeyer deaths linked to President Clinton”; “Hsu Hillary”; “Mearsheimer Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy”; Stricherz “Why the Democrats are Blue”; “Who Would the World Elect”.
Nate,
Although your gay friend is not happy with his sexual orientation, you're making lots of statements and assumptions. I view them as incorrect statements and assumptions.
Sexual orientation, like many things in life, is still pretty much of a mystery. I firmly believe sexual orientation is genetic.
Personality types are genetic. Lots of things are genetic. Lots! Does one choose to be an introvert? Does one choose to be an extrovert? Does one choose to be bipolar?
I haven't read the G Quotient, by Kirk Snyder, but I've read bits and pieces of the book on the Internet. According to Snyder, gays and lesbians are proving to be very talented and valuable employees in the business world.
Cities that are very gay-friendly with lots of culture are generally dynamic cities. Bright, college-educated, gays and lesbians desire to live in gay-affirming cities. That's why a million dollars buys a closet in San Francisco, and buys a huge house in Oklahoma City. The forces of supply and demand are at play.
Mitt Romney is a metaphor for what has gone terribly wrong with the values and no-talent/creativity we elevate in our society circa 2008. Like his peers at Merrill Lynch, Citi and George Bush -- and all those he appointed in his own Administration and in Iraq, a vacuousness and greed have driven out any semblance of high standards and ethics. What does Mitt Romney say about American business at-large, our economy, legacies for elites/dynasties and the limitations of a bottom-line-only standard for American life??? How do we REALLY know Hillary Clinton is as talented as she says and we are not looking at a 3rd term for her husband, instead? During Mitt's Campaign I continually began to call him George Romney, who he CONSTANTLY relied upon and reminded us of throughout. As with Hillary and George W. Bush, (over)dependence upon a talented family member or legacy, has its limitations. Due to the costs of higher education, Reagan tax policies and other factors, we have become a Nation of dynasties and legacies in Government and business...and it doesn't much matter whether or not you are Right or Left since both take care of the other in a revolving door of special interests, lobbying, think tanks, university appointments, corporate boards, etc. The American people are just their currency, without even the benefit of secure healthcare while we carry elites and the world's security. This must come to an end. Take the FOR SALE off the backs of the American people and their interests. Billary, show us the DONOR RECORDS and performance records of Hill at the Clinton Library for the American people to do our OWN vetting! While you are at it, RELEASE YOUR TAX RETURNS.