Arts & Culture

Starck Contrast

Move over minimalism, says design duo

This article was published in the February 13, 2008, edition of The New York Observer.

Architect Stephen Alesch and Robin Standefer of Roman and Williams in their studio.
Photograph by Michael Nagle
Architect Stephen Alesch and Robin Standefer of Roman and Williams in their studio.

Stephen Alesch and Robin Standefer, co-principals in the architecture and design firm Roman and Williams, have very definite opinions about the minimalist aesthetic that has prevailed in Manhattan for almost two decades.

“Take the Gehry building on the West Side,” said Mr. Alesch the other day, sitting at a table made from a reclaimed factory door in the firm’s offices on Lafayette Street, referring to the nine-story glass structure, home to Barry Diller’s InterActiveCorp, that seems to jut above the highway like a disembodied jumble of windows.

Oh,” groaned Ms. Standefer.

“Every car I’ve ever been in, when we’ve driven by it, we’ve made fun of it,” Mr. Alesch said.

“Every single person I’ve ever been with,” Ms. Standefer echoed with a nod.

SANAA’s recently completed New Museum on the Bowery, meanwhile? “A monument to abandonment,” Mr. Alesch declared. “I think it leaves a lot of people empty. The only people it doesn’t are fashion-obsessed or architects, I swear to God.”

“Fashion-obsessed like they want to fit in,” Ms. Standefer said.

“There’s a huge amount of artifice in modern architecture,” Mr. Alesch said. “It loves to brag that it’s really, really authentic—that the most authentic method of living is in a kind of minimalist environment. But it’s so contrived and so pretend.”

“But then you have to define what you think modern is, because I think we’re modern,” Ms. Standefer said.

The couple, who founded Roman and Williams in 1999, naming it after their respective grandfathers (“We just loved the period they’re from, what they represent, we like the genes they gave us,” said Ms. Standefer)—is currently attempting to redefine what, exactly, New York thinks of as “modern.” Their company, which currently employs 25, is responsible for the low-lit, masculine makeover of Philippe Starck’s lobby in the Royalton last fall. By year’s end; they plan a redo of both the Breslin, a landmark building on Broadway and West 29th Street, commissioned by ACE Hotel Group, a hipster firm based in Seattle; and the Standard, hotelier André Balazs’s hotly anticipated behemoth in the meatpacking district. Morgans Hotel Group, which owns the Royalton, also retained the firm last month to turn 30,000 feet of unused underground space at the Hudson Hotel on 356 West 58th Street, another Starck creation, into an entertainment and meeting complex, complete with a screening room built into the site of an old, unused swimming pool.

The Roman and Williams aesthetic is a richly textured, purposefully nostalgic and largely handmade one: full of massive, dark woods and animal skins and re-purposed industrial materials, like that factory door. It’s the kind of sturdy design that’s meant to last 500 years—if only trends would permit.

A New Standard

When they are together, which is most of the time, the mellow Mr. Alesch, 42, and the faster-talking Ms. Standefer, 43, speak almost exclusively in the first-person-plural tense, constructing joint, richly textured run-on sentences, much as they layer materials and idiosyncratic objects in the hotels and residences they create.

He has longish blond hair and facial scruff, grew up in Wisconsin, was trained as an architect through internships after graduating from Northern Arizona University and likes to surf at the beach near the couple’s home in Montauk, where they retire each weekend to entertain friends like hotelier Sean McPherson, who owns a residence nearby. Next Page >

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

rodger (not verified) says:

Gosh, I do like the work that roman and williams have done at the royalton, up to a point.
I think these guys are really good stylists, up to a point.
sad thing is, the royalton will fail way quicker than the philip starck project ever did. you can bet on it.
These guys are stylists who have forgotten the importance of their architectural education.
a good layout matters and the royalton doesnt have that.
The restaurant, while innovative in retro kind of way is a dead end cul de sac that is far too removed from the street and the spaces that have the energy. the seating is often awkwardly laid out and not good for generating social activity. ... cases in point.
They ought to be a little less proud of their position on design, they work well in set design perhaps, but they haven't made the transition to practicing good architecture yet, in fact, i doubt, base on what i am reading here, that they ever knew what it was.

bluevertical (not verified) says:

idiots!!! is that minimalist enough?

greg.org (not verified) says:

so one hotel client hires them because they have "no style," and the new owner of the Royalton is some accountant hack from some flyover state who has no style or sense of NYC.

These idiots blithely destroyed one of the city's most significant--one of the only intact, for that matter--interiors of the 80's era, and replaced it with a kitschy, hippie rec room.

The pieces are all here for an utter and complete takedown--the subjects themselves are practically baiting you. And yet the Observer chokes, giving us an uncritical puff piece sprinkled a few hints of what could have been.

Now you have Royalton Lobby blood on your hands, too. It might be a spilled Cosmo, but it still ain't coming off.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

This poor couple does not realize they are being hired for their ass-kissing. Just like production designers on films all they have to do is please, not think.

End of Reason (not verified) says:

Whenever anyone starts a critique with "My friends and I always laugh...." you know whatever follows is rubbish. Ass kissing is right. These two wouldn't know good design if it smacked them in their dirty brown noses.

Jimmy BP (not verified) says:

Okay, Royalton aside, fluffy writing aside, how often do I see something in print that takes the gloves off and puts something out there other than nauseating torrents of praise for any stupid shape dreamed up by some celebrity of the moment from somewhere or other? Pretty brave, as long as you're up for the same where your work is concerned. Actually, I think the hotel is sexy, not the Parthenon, and it will probably end up in a dumpster like nearly all hotel lobbies, retail stores or clubs. The Stark hotel was amazing when it was new, but was it enduring?

Lots of breathless excitement and sanctimonious endorsement for things that even if we wanted them around for a hundred years, they probably won't make it. Explanations aside (I read them over and over again), can you imagine thinking 'I'm going to build a museum in New York, and I want it to look just like a stack of pizza boxes'? How 'New York' is that? 'That is what I aspire to as an architect. That is the right thing to do. I've always loved piles of boxes with no scale, detail or materiality. I always wanted to make one myself. They inspire me. They are innovative. Fresh. I love to walk down the streets of a magnificent city and see bland, featureless things that used to be new. I want to spend time in them after the whiteness goes all yellow and grey. For as long as I remember, I've always hated buildings with fussy, textured materials and tiresome details made by ignorant, unenlightened simpletons. That was okay before our world was transformed by innovation and an optimistic vision of what the future might be. Those other buildings are old, depressing; boring. They are not entertaining or fresh or 'important'. We cannot afford them anyway. People will love my bland-box and it will enrich their lives and those of future generations". Or: "People like featureless buildings. It's not like it used to be. Ugly is the new wonderful. Buildings are temporary anyway. It's a throwaway world. That's fine as long as they are recyclable. Innovation made of soy. Cradle to cradle. It's very 'green'. We have to consider the environment. We live in a new world, and we'll be taught to love it. It's re-purposed. Maybe buildings need expiration dates. People need to be educated so that they will learn how great bland can be and learn to love bland. They must be taught to surrender their ancient, ignorant, reactionary prejudices and embrace innovation."

I hate dry wall. Hard to get inspired by a bunch of rectangles made of gypsum and paper. Spank me.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

its a shame what they did at the Royalton. That they would even consider opining about other designers in this paper is beyond me. It clearly demonstrates their lack of judgement and respect, in the deepest sense of the word, for their colleagues.

For the duo to suggest that their cumbersome brown room [that was even panned by a non-architect food critic-- who couldn't avoid commenting] gives them permission to criticize Gehry and SANAA is shameful and in bad taste.

Like much of Hollywood (and--or--as well as, their celebrity bloated clients like Hudson and Paltrow) they are caught in their own publicity machines that create smoke and rattle along braying, sneering and kibbutzing everything around them.

Step back Observer and observe what it is you are fueling here...has the writer's eyes welled up from the smoke, the lack of irony or just their shmoozy quasi aesthetic?

They are tacky, when you get down to it...

Anonymous (not verified) says:

fact check..."architects"!?..last time I checked, one needed to be licensed in order to advertise themselves as architects.

wow gold (not verified) says:
google (not verified) says:
wow gold (not verified) says:
wow gold (not verified) says:

who owns a residence nearby

diezhilian (not verified) says:

owei37
wow gold
wow gold
wow gold
租房

EE (not verified) says:

一氧化碳检测仪
一氧化碳报警器
可燃气体检测仪
有毒气体检测仪
气体检测仪
空气呼吸器
VOC检测仪
酒精检测仪
空气质量检测仪
多种气体检测仪
微量氧分析仪
煤气报警器
润滑油
变频器
软起动器
收缩膜
注塑
活性炭
车库门
卷帘门
铲车
挖土机
轧钢设备
调直机
砂石设备
砂石生产线
洗砂机
造纸机
钉机
切削液集中过滤
切屑压块机
液压缸
气缸
蓓丽艺佳百度
铝合金升降机
裤业百度
洗车机已在首页 做到前五
钢结构公司
北京钢结构
滤油机
版权代理已在首页 做到前五
破石机
空芯砖机
真空砖机
制砂设备
上海月饼
翡翠百度
翡翠玉手镯百度
气缸
液压缸
二手不绣钢反应釜
钢格板
室内高尔夫
压力容器
罐式集装箱
投资移民加拿大
韩式隆鼻
专业音响
微波干燥
北京平面设计公司
北京广告设计公司
造纸机械
过滤机
虚拟主机
模拟高尔夫
服务器租用
看看沟槽管件看看
膨体
油水分离器
塑料机械
不锈钢法兰
反光膜
无菌室
肝癌治疗
治疗肝癌
肝癌晚期
条码软件
隆鼻
反应釜
生殖器疱疹
塔机
条码
条码机
移动计算
过滤机
水性漆
水性防锈漆
水性金属漆
饲料机械
饲料粉碎机
固定资产管理
固定资产管理系统
固定资产
资产管理软件
不干胶标签
条形码打印机
扫描器
扫描枪
淀粉设备
工艺纸绳
工艺纸布
混凝土搅拌站
鼻整形
鼻延长
隆鼻照片
肝癌晚期治疗
制粒机
饲料混合机
铁屑粉碎机
排屑器
排屑机
过滤纸
淀粉设备
北京旅游
儿童摄影
燃烧设备

wow gold (not verified) says:

Welcome to wow GoLd website!we sell cheap world of Wow golD. All kinds of world of WOw golDof warcraft guides cheats here,buy woW goLD,If you are looking for world of warcraft WoW gold as well as wOw Goldand a place to buy wow gold website specialized in selling WOw gold. We will serve you with cheap woW gOld, cheap WOw gold. WOw gold,wow geld
you can get cheapest WOw gold for sale.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

WOW GOLD
When you play wow golda game of the day, the listwow power leveling of friends in the game whether there are always a few names of blackwow power leveling wow power leveling friends, who have accompanied you to upgrade

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.