Close Stay up-to-date with
Observer.com Newsletters
Sign up for Observer Newsletters!
RSS Feed
The New York Observer

Weiner Takes the High Road, Markowitz Offers His 'Input' on Congestion Pricing

View Story On One Page View Story On One Page Print This Story Print This Story Share This Story Share This Story
April 7, 2008 | 6:02 p.m

Anthony Weiner, who opposed congestion pricing before Michael Bloomberg officially unveiled it, is (again!) taking the high road today.

Weiner, a likely mayoral candidate, released a statement saying, "Today may close a chapter on congestion pricing, but hopefully not the book on improving New York City's environment, reducing congestion, and raising additional revenue for mass transit. While the sides were clearly drawn, it's now time to come together to find solutions to these important challenges.”

Marty Markowitz, who might also run for mayor, was a less emphatic opponent. In the wake of its near-certain failure, the characteristically outspoken Brooklyn borough president links himself to Bloomberg and notes that he had several proposals that, he says, would have made the plan better:

“Mayor Bloomberg loves this city just as I do, and he is to be commended for his vision and courage in taking on big issues. That’s why I want to offer him and the Commission my full cooperation and input as we move forward and work together on a congestion pricing plan that is fair to everyone. Whether it’s through an increase in the gasoline tax or other creative ideas, there has to be a more equitable plan that accomplishes our shared goals of cleaner air, reduced congestion and additional revenue for mass transit improvements.

"I personally made several recommendations aimed at making this proposal better but, frankly, the plan ultimately put forward would have unfairly penalized motorists from outside Manhattan, especially drivers forced to travel to the Central Business District for medical reasons and small businesspeople that depend on their vehicles for their livelihood. I look forward to more dialogue on this issue, and remain confident we can agree on a plan that is fair to all New Yorkers.”
Post a Comment The Discussion