Time Inc.'s Squires Assembles Team of Rivals to Harness Digital Media
Some of the magazine industry’s biggest names are on the verge of forming a new company that would allow them to take the digital future into their own hands.
The company would make up one of the biggest alliances among rival publishers ever formed in print media, with Time Inc., Condé Nast and Hearst all expected to join, houses that together publish more than 50 magazines, including The New Yorker, Vanity Fair, Vogue, Time, People, Sports Illustrated, Esquire and O, The Oprah Magazine.
The company will prepare magazines that can work across multiple digital platforms, whether the iPhone, the BlackBerry or countless other digital devices. The company will not develop an e-book, but create something that people familiar with the plans compare to iTunes—a store where you can buy new and distinct iterations of The New Yorker or Time. Print magazines will also be for sale.
John Squires, an executive vice president at Time Inc., is planning to leave Time Inc. and become the interim executive of the new company, sources told The Observer. His term is expected to be six months, during which time the group will search for a permanent executive.
The deal is not done, but if all goes according to plan, the company could be announced within weeks, and other publishers may join in as well.
“It’s very close and more imminent than it’s been,” said one source familiar with the situation.
In June, Mr. Squires gave up his job of running the business side of the news division for Time Inc, and became the digital futurist at the company.
With the blessing of Time Inc. executives, Mr. Squires immediately started taking meetings with other publishers and insisted that they pull together.
“He’s been the one generating interest,” said another source from a rival publishing house.
“Basically, this was his deal from the get-go,” said a source. “He had this idea. These guys are all big competitors and now they’re laying down their arms to try figure this whole new world out together.”
Each magazine publisher now believes it’s too risky to go it alone to find new ways to get consumers to pay. If they all join together, the reasoning goes, they stand a better chance of producing greater revenue.
The deal is taking time to complete because it involves so many moving pieces.
“It’s pretty complicated stuff,” said a source. “The really, really hard part is that you’ve got so many different kinds of devices running on different operating systems. And how do you handle that? The consortium provides one point of contact for the consumer. When you come to the main store, you can get the content any way you want.”
In addition to building up the store, each publisher will actually have to figure out how to build digital versions of their own magazines.
When we reached Mr. Squires on the phone, he would not comment, and referred us to a Time Inc. spokeswoman, who also declined to comment.
But Mr. Squires has been a proponent of building the magazine experience for devices for a while. Indeed, in an interview with The Observer back in February, he hinted that this was the only way out.
“Unlike books and music, I think [for magazines] it involves designing a new product in order for it to be something that consumers really love,” said Mr. Squires. “I like our chances to be able to design a product that consumers will want to pay for.”
In other words, something like the Kindle isn’t changing the form at all. It’s simply a repository for content. Mr. Squires believes that the magazine companies themselves have to remind consumers that the magazine experience, no matter what the form, is worth paying for.
“With magazines, the form has to change,” he continued. “All I’m saying is that there are ways to design magazines differently for that kind of experience that’ll be attractive and will feel different to a consumer.”
jkoblin@observer.com
More from John Koblin:
- Tags:
- Media |
- Esquire O The Oprah Magazine |
- John Squires |
- People |
- Sports Illustrated |
- The New Yorker |
- Time |
- Time Inc. |
- Vanity Fair |
- Vogue








Shut the stable door! The horse has bolted.
This cannot work. Vested interests and open collaboration don't add up to symbiosis.
In a world where single-use reading matter is coming to be seen as having little enduring value, people will not pay when there is so much else available free. It is more than greedy for publishers to expect to charge a cover price AND add in as much advertising as they can get. Consumers are voting with their eyes and their eyes are focussing on the many alternatives to this grasping model.
When I buy a book, it may or may not have enduring value to me, but I may be able to sell it or to give it to someone who will find it useful. Books are rarely of single-use value. They can endure. They can have a very long useful life. They carry no advertising. You pay for them and you get what you paid for with no ads or other distractions that the publisher put in to make even more money out of you, the unrewarded objet of an advertiser's interest. Put ads in a book and I would expect the cost to be zero. Give me a book that I want with no ads and I will pay.
Magazines and newspapers have to follow that model.
If you could develop a publication that had pure entertainment value such as short stories, funny stories etc., but no news and product feature advertorials, it might gain a small market. But traditional magazines and papers are dead or dying and their owners just won't accept that there is no way to keep the old business model alive. The digital world is a real leveller and democratiser. In future, if you do not provide what is wanted with a high quality and value quotient, you will fail. If you expect to get revenues from cover charges and ad revenues, you will fail.
I hope and believe that what is coming is a cottage industry of small publishing houses putting out quality material to a discerning audience. For the rest of society, ie the undiscerning mass, well the ad-driven free blogsites will do as their sources of news and entertainment. They are free after all.