Watch Out, Times! Murdoch Plans $15 M. N.Y.C. Edition

December 1, 2009 | 7:32 p.m
<br /> (Getty Images)
Getty Images

"Good journalism is an expensive commodity,” said Rupert Murdoch at a Federal Trade Commission conference in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, Dec. 1.

We’ll say!

Mr. Murdoch is ready to roll out a budget of $15 million for his new New York edition of The Wall Street Journal, an insider familiar with the project told The Observer.

The Journal is creating a section that will cover local politics, culture, news and sports. For the time being, the section’s launch is set for April. It is expected to run six days a week. It is not clear yet if the metro report will be a discrete section, or if an entirely different edition of the paper will be sold here.

The Journal has hired a former editor at The New York Sun, John Seeley, to run the project. He’s been taking interviews in recent weeks, looking for recruits.

>>GET THE BACKSTORY ON THE WSJ'S HIRING OF JOHN SEELEY

“I’m not going to discuss anything at this point,” said Mr. Seeley on the phone from The Journal’s headquarters on Sixth Avenue on Tuesday.

Mr. Murdoch, who was an admirer of Mr. Seeley’s former paper, seems intent on creating a New York Sun on steroids. Certainly, a planned $15 million budget—which would go toward building a newsroom, a sales staff, a marketing team, the works—suggests the effort is a serious one.

Mr. Murdoch has been outspoken in his optimism for the future of journalism, but his goal for this project is specific.

“From the day he got the paper, he always wanted to direct aim at The Times,” said a source familiar with Mr. Murdoch’s thinking. “This is the only way to meet that challenge.”

The Times lost its stand-alone metro section a year ago, and has since been placed its metro content in the back pages of the A-section.

We sampled a few New York political consultants and one elected official to get their takes on what impact a solidly budgeted New York–edition Journal could have—and what that could mean for The Times.

“You could drive a truck through the space between the wonderfully titillating tabloids and the perceived self-seriousness of The Times,” said Stefan Friedman, a public-relations specialist at KnickerbockerSKD. “There is a need and a want.

“With the elimination of the metro section, space in The Times is extremely competitive,” he continued. “There are maybe eight stories in the metro section each day. Take away breaking news and you’re down to half that. That’s where you can reach lawmakers, and with the area being so crowded, [The Journal has] a real opportunity from the PR side.”

“It’s a great thing,” said Eric Schneiderman, a state senator from the city. “One of the things that is frustrating with Albany is that people downstate don’t know what we’re doing, and it’s hard to get attention for issues.”

“Given the withdrawal of serious news coverage of politics and government in the New York metro area, The Journal sees that there’s an opening, and if they go forward, they will fill that void,” said Bill Cunningham, a political consultant at DKC. “And they’ll be welcomed by many players in the government of this area.”

“In The Times there are three or four stories about state and city government, which is nothing like what they had when they had a metro section,” he continued. “It has really affected The Times: They decided to become a national newspaper. They gave up a lot of their New York identity.”

And the desire for more New York coverage is not limited to political circles, either.

Back in June, we spoke with Pia Catton, The Sun’s former culture editor—and current features editor at Politico—who said that a new, robust culture section could immediately make an impact.

The Journal is making a very smart decision by focusing on New York. … The Times has gone wrong by covering arts nationally and casting the net so wide that they aren’t focused on New York anymore,” she said.

Let the broadsheet wars begin.

jkoblin@observer.com

More from John Koblin:

Sun's Seeley to Head New, New York-Centric Section at WSJ

Wall Street Journal Develops New York-Specific Culture Section




COMMENTS (4 posted)

Nah

Unlike most of the reactionary comments seeking to praise the idea, the new section won't change the landscape much. The Times will continue to be the Times and the Journal will continue to be the Journal.

daveinboca

Rupert just passed USAToday as the largest circulating newspaper in the country and the faltering NYT continues to lose about 7% of its circulation EVERY SIX MONTHS! The preposterous Grey Hooker is drowning in its own cesspool of selected news---no AGW e-mail leaks, no John Edwards infidelity, no bad angles on POTUS O-bow-ma nor can Dear Leader do any wrong, while Sarah Palin gets hammered by a bunch of childless crones on the NYT staff. Joe Biden? Those hairplugs haven't eaten out his brains, yet.

Gimme an R! Gimme a U! Gimme

Gimme an R! Gimme a U! Gimme a P!. Go Rupert. My guess is that Mr. Slim has got a hand in this deal somewhere. He's got a hell of a lot more in common with Murdoch, and certainly a hell of a lot more respect for Murdoch than he does for the bumbling spoiled brat pinchie and he can't be very happy with the way his investment in the slimes is going! As a demonstrably outstanding businessman, I doubt Murdoch would be making this direct assault on the Slimes without knowledge/estimate of the reaction of the only guy he respects in the entire slimes organization. Allegedly, Slims motivation was to move from being a run of the mill Gazillionaire to being respected world wide as "owner/financier" of one of the world's great newspapers. That ain't happening at the gray lady! This could get interesting!

I think we need

to see exactly what this section looks like before we estimate what's going to happen. If this is more of a means to simply stick it to The Times, I don't see why we should expect The Journal to make a big difference. I don't see spite being the inspiration for a successful news operation. The Times could probably decide to reemphasize a focus on New York in the same way that it's approaching the Bay Area or Chicago area by using non-profit like services.

Whatever the case, I think we'll be seeing the same sort of fight in cities all over the country. Even if The Times isn't the top dog everywhere, it'll still be right behind The Journal.