Newsday Does Not Want Your Stupid Money Anyway
Although the "press had a little fun with a recent remark" made by publisher Terry Jimenez, Newsday would like everyone one to know that everything is going fine with their paywall and this basically exactly how they planned it and it is fine.
Cablevision local media president Tad Smith explained in a memo:
Newsday's web strategy has two parts: 1) to provide Newsday's print subscribers with a rich web experience that goes far beyond what they can get in the newspaper alone, thereby motivating them to remain, return, or choose to subscribe to Newsday; and 2) to provide Cablevision's high-speed Internet customers with reasons to remain with Cablevision, reasons to return to Cablevision, or reasons to choose Cablevision.
The way to measure success for newsday.com is not, therefore, to count how many people sign up to pay $260 per year for access to the website.
The memo refers to the site's "approximately three dozen subscribers"; John Koblin's more precise count is 35.
Elsewhere in paywall planning: Felix Salmon thinks The Times model will be revenue-neutral.
- More:
- Media |
- The Daily Transom |
- Daily Transom |
- Newsday







Oh, Tallulah!
(Re)introducing: The Media Mob!
Stiller Waters Run Deep
What We Learned This Week (March 13-19)
The Gay Terrorist
The Floppy-Haired Fellows
SMITH, ARE YOU SERIOUS?
So let me get this straight. Because I am a Cablevision subscriber (along with other Long Islanders) I receive FREE access to Newsday.com. Okay, thanks. But now there isn't any logical reason for me to subscribe to Newsday, the paper. So I save money. Thanks again! The big question is when everyone else cancels the paper and there isn't any circulation and advertising revenue, how can you afford to run the website? Brilliant move!