The Gay Terrorist

By Aram Roston
March 16, 2010 | 9:14 p.m
<br /> (Illustration By Anthony Russo)
Illustration By Anthony Russo

It’s been more than eight years since 9/11, but the fallout continues to reverberate throughout today’s New York. The Obama administration’s waffling over how to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the attack’s mastermind, and the continuous, embarrassing delay in rebuilding the towers downtown have kept 9/11 more in the headlines than usual.

Now, as those political battles roll on, a new story about the run-up to 9/11 has emerged—a previously undisclosed, covert C.I.A. effort to recruit a spy to penetrate Al Qaeda a year and a half before the planes crashed into the towers.

The development is intriguing in part because the informant they were after was thought to be secretly gay—a fact that gave intelligence agents leverage in their efforts to turn him against his conservative Islamist circle. But the case may also help answer one of the long-standing mysteries of the 9/11 narrative: why a terrorist known to one part of the U.S. government wasn’t captured by other parts before he boarded a plane and helped carry out the most devastating attacks on the country.

Intelligence officials tell The Observer that the character at the center of the intrigue was an enigmatic but jovial man named Ahmad Hikmat Shakir, or “Shakir el Iraqi.” “He was tall as a mushroom, fat and gay,” one source familiar with the case told The Observer, “and the idea was to exploit him as an agent against Al Qaeda.”

The C.I.A.’s pursuit of Mr. Shakir, and the role he could have played in stopping, or at least complicating, the 9/11 plot, is a story that’s never been told, adding yet another piece in the puzzle leading up to the attacks.

Mr. Shakir’s story began on Jan. 5, 2000, at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport. He was there to meet a passenger on an incoming flight from Dubai—a Yemeni-born terrorist named Khalid al-Mihdhar. As it happens, the C.I.A. had its eyes on both of them.

Mr. Shakir didn’t have much, if any, of a file at the time. Few knew much about him, except that he was an Iraqi Arab, in his late 30s, with a dead-end job as a VIP greeter for Malaysian Airlines. But Mr. Mihdhar flashed big on the C.I.A.’s radar. At 25, he was already a deeply seasoned terrorist, with battlefield experience in Bosnia and time spent at various jihadi camps, and the agency knew that he’d come to Malaysia for some kind of special terror summit. The agency had one other key piece of intelligence: a U.S. visa had been stamped in Mr. Mihdhar’s green Saudi passport, meaning he almost certainly had been tapped for some kind of mission in America.

Indeed, it was this multiple-entry visa that would allow Mr. Mihdhar to come to America shortly after the C.I.A. started tracking him, and then, 18 months later, hijack an airliner as part of the 9/11 attacks.

Normally, the C.I.A. would have told the Federal Bureau of Investigation about the visa. That way he might have been arrested, or placed on a watch list, or at least questioned when he stepped into the U.S. Stopping him, some experts think, could well have stopped 9/11. 

But the agency didn’t tell the F.B.I. about that visa, an act of omission that has baffled 9/11 buffs ever since.

MORE>> WHY THE NEW WORLD TRADE CENTER SHOULD NEVER BE BUILT

As the C.I.A. watched, Messrs. Mihdhar and Shakir climbed into a taxi outside the airport and drove to an upscale apartment complex near a golf course. For the next three days, Mr. Mihdhar and about half a dozen other high-level terrorists planned future strikes against America, including the hijackings of 9/11, according to multiple intelligence experts. In anti-terrorism circles, Kuala Lumpur is seen as a critical stop on the road to the attacks.

It’s uncertain whether Mr. Shakir participated in the meetings. But clearly, he was connected. And as the terror summit went on, the C.I.A. became convinced that it had found the perfect mole to help the agency crack the jihadi circle. Mr. Shakir seemed to have excellent contacts among the radical jihadists, and, according to intelligence sources, he certainly didn’t look like a terrorist or a spy.

Another source described Mr. Shakir to The Observer as a potential “access agent,” espionage jargon for an informant whose function is to spot other potential spies and turncoats. Though he may not know secrets or terrorist plots himself, the access agent is likely to know people who do, and is expected to facilitate meetings. As this officer explained, the agency “looked to him as a social broker.”

Mr. Shakir was no James Bond. In fact, he was short and fat and sociable, and was surmised to be gay, which would have opened him up to being flipped. (Mohamed Atta, the 9/11 hijacker from Egypt, was also rumored to be gay.)

Page: 1 2 3



COMMENTS (6 posted)

FBI WATCH MAKING CRUELTY VISIBLE

I like this disinformation piece. If you want some real evidence linking members of the US Government creating 911 see 911pressfortruth. com

Gay Nonsense

This story only serves to support the myths already disseminated by the government about the attacks of 9/11. The 'planners' of 9/11 were not a group of young men, totally inexperienced in flying airliners, and so absolutely brilliant as to get by NORAD and the entire US defense system in four separate plane. Let's get real.

The 9/11 Truth Movement is finally getting its evidence and vital questions to the public, and stories such as this are being leaked to news sources to counter and discredit the facts that have been uncovered.

If you want to understand how this plays into the hands of those who were really behind the attacks, and who have suppressed any discussion of the truth, tune in tonight (3/17) to TVNL Radio Live. Jesse Richard, editor of http://tvnewslies.org will interview a member of Firefighters for 9/11 Truth. Listen to their stories.

The same show featured the founder or Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth a few weeks back, and on the 31st of this month David Ray Griffin will be a guest. Griffin has written extensively on the subject, - notably a book listing the omissions and lies of the 9/11 Commission Report.

It's time to distinguish between propaganda and fact. Believing anything the CIA has to say is a fool's errand.

Gay Terrorist?

How completely typical of the ignorant neocons to provide these kinds of disinformation pieces as the movement for truth marches ever closer to exposing the false-flag attacks in NYC.
Americans are fed-up with this kind of lie.

made for tv?

regardless of what any of us believe happened or who was involved; 9/11 was a conspiracy. even the "official report" is a conspiracy theory. i have to say that "details" such as this story only make me doubt these "official reports" more and more. this whole thing is about as far fetched as one hundred and ten stories of steel and concrete "pancaking" in under ten seconds. but keep it coming; it's better than an episode of lost.

Shameless Sensational Headline

The headline "Gay Terrorist" on the front of this week's edition only places The Observer in the same league as the NY Post. The article, detailing facts about an individual who has low-level terrorist ties and MIGHT be gay, only strengthens stereotypes that gay people are somehow horrific people.

The article fails to prove that Shakir is gay - and to that extent - what being gay would have to do with any knowledge he might have had about 9/11. The CIA presumptuously approached him based on this unsubstantiated rumor and failed to recruit him.

To further the negative stereotype of gays, the article mentions that 9/11 hijacker Atta "was also rumored to be gay."

To headline this story around sexual orientation only serves to distract the true facts in this case, which is that our intelligence community missed another opportunity to uncover the 9/11 plot before it happened.

Shameless Sensational Headline

The headline "Gay Terrorist" on the front of this week's edition only places The Observer in the same league as the NY Post. The article, detailing facts about an individual who has low-level terrorist ties and MIGHT be gay, only strengthens stereotypes that gay people are somehow horrific people.

The article fails to prove that Shakir is gay - and to that extent - what being gay would have to do with any knowledge he might have had about 9/11. The CIA presumptuously approached him based on this unsubstantiated rumor and failed to recruit him.

To further the negative stereotype of gays, the article mentions that 9/11 hijacker Atta "was also rumored to be gay."

To headline this story around sexual orientation only serves to distract the true facts in this case, which is that our intelligence community missed another opportunity to uncover the 9/11 plot before it happened.