<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Currently Hanging</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/blog/36027/%2A/feed</link>
 <description>Recent posts</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Dubrow Is Highbrow</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/dubrow-highbrow</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Drive—<em>aesthetic</em> drive—is rare in contemporary art. Commerce is the thing. And John Dubrow, whose paintings are at Lori Bookstein Fine Art, wants to sell his art as much as the next guy. But viewers will recognize that commerce is the last thing on Mr. Dubrow’s mind when he’s in the studio. His paintings are relentlessly independent, his drive is never in question and, boy, is it intimidating.<br />
<p class="text">Initiative counts for bubkes if the results are lousy; drive can’t be the sole determinant of merit. Mr. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/dubrow-highbrow">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/dubrow-highbrow#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/45473">John Dubrow</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:40:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69126 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Abstract Clumps Became Philip Roth and Dick Nixon</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/how-abstract-clumps-became-philip-roth-and-dick-nixon</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Once, the American painter Philip Guston (1913-1980) was a polarizing artist. It’s the stuff of legend: An esteemed second-generation Abstract Expressionist, renowned for exquisitely honed arrangements of fleshy brushstrokes, turns to a brutish figurative art—a nightmarish realm of Klansmen, endless hangovers and hellish rooms lit by bare light bulbs. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/how-abstract-clumps-became-philip-roth-and-dick-nixon">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/how-abstract-clumps-became-philip-roth-and-dick-nixon#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/42732">Philip Guston</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:45:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68791 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Koons’ Expensive Distractions Clutter Met’s Summer Rooftop</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/koons-expensive-distractions-clutter-met-s-summer-rooftop</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>A few months back, I bumped into a colleague at the Met’s Courbet exhibition. After a polite disagreement about the merits of the 19th-century French painter—he’s a fan, I’m not—we extolled the Met’s stellar run of historical exhibitions mounted under the guidance of since-retired director Philippe de Montebello: Ingres, tapestries, Velázquez, the Greek and Roman galleries, the list goes on.<br />
<p class="text">When the discussion turned to the museum’s forays into contemporary art, the requisite eyeball-rolling ensued. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/koons-expensive-distractions-clutter-met-s-summer-rooftop">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/koons-expensive-distractions-clutter-met-s-summer-rooftop#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30893">Jeff Koons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30897">The Metropolitan Museum of Art</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:09:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68455 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sleeper</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/sleeper</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In the past 30 years Thomas Nozkowski’s allusive yet enigmatically abstract paintings have gradually acquired a cultlike devotion. This patient, quietly determined artist is the anti-hype—his paintings are <em>slow</em>.<br />
<p class="text"><span>Lately, however, Mr. Nozkowski has been getting a lot of attention. His paintings were featured at the Venice Biennale last summer; a mini-retrospective at Long  Island City’s Emily Fisher  Landau Center just closed; and two of his paintings from MoMA’s permanent collection are currently on display. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/sleeper">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/sleeper#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33028">Thomas Nozkowski</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:19:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68164 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Warhol, Porn and Vuitton</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/warhol-porn-and-vuitton</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The most interesting thing about Takashi Murakami, whose paintings, sculptures and merchandise are the subject of “© Murakami” at the Brooklyn Museum, is that he’s above shame. To know shame is to realize there are standards of behavior that, when bent or broken, cause remorse or, at least, self-awareness of having done wrong. Shame is unknown in Mr. Murakami’s rarefied orbit: Art is an adjunct of capital. There’s no second thought given to this fact.<br />
<p class="text">Andy Warhol is the starting point for Mr. Murakami’s cold embrace of heedless commercialism. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/warhol-porn-and-vuitton">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/warhol-porn-and-vuitton#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28315">Andy Warhol</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51721">Louis Vuitton</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:18:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67836 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Flora, Cupcakes and a Tawny Ambience</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/flora-cupcakes-and-tawny-ambience</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Susan Homer, whose paintings are at metaphor contemporary art in Brooklyn, works in two distinct manners predicated on two distinct scales. On large canvases—for Ms. Homer that would be around five by six feet—she paints free-floating accumulations of flora. In small formats—the paintings don’t go beyond 12 inches in any direction—Ms. Homer dedicates herself to domesticity graced by nature: birds alighting on teacups, cupcakes or a dish containing ginger cookies.<br />
<p class="text"><span>Ms. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/flora-cupcakes-and-tawny-ambience">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/flora-cupcakes-and-tawny-ambience#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54184">Susan Homer</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 11:20:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67528 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Pennsylvania Cubist</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/pennsylvania-cubist</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Squirreled away in the Whitney’s mezzanine galleries, far from the Biennial’s hubbub, is an exhibition of paintings, drawings and watercolors by the American modernist Charles Demuth (1883-1935). “Chimneys and Towers: Charles Demuth’s Late Paintings of Lancaster” is devoted predominantly to industrial images of Demuth’s Pennsylvania hometown.   <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/pennsylvania-cubist">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/pennsylvania-cubist#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/46696">Charles Demuth</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:20:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67191 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Floating World Settles Over City</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/floating-world-settles-over-city</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><span>“Designed for Pleasure: The World of Edo Japan in Prints and Paintings, 1680-1860,” an exhibition at the Asia Society, is a trying experience because the awe it elicits is unremitting. Has there been a New York exhibition quite as beautiful? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/floating-world-settles-over-city">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/floating-world-settles-over-city#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32956">Asia Society</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:10:35 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66878 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Advertisements for Himself</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/advertisements-himself</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The 19th-century French painter Gustave Courbet (1819-1877) was a big personality, a cultural subversive, a braggart and showman worthy of P. T. Barnum. He was also a paint-handler of exquisite grit and outrageous sensuality—traits that combined into an artist whose greatness just barely redeemed his insufferable narcissism. By the time you’re through with the first gallery of the Met’s “Gustave Courbet,” ringed with 20 or so self-portraits of the artist, you’ll have had quite enough of Courbet.<br />
<p class="text">The arrogance of youth is everywhere in these pictures. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/advertisements-himself">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/advertisements-himself#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33215">Gustave Courbet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30897">The Metropolitan Museum of Art</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:52:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66551 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Alas, the Biennial Is … Kinda Boring</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/alas-biennial-kinda-boring</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Somewhere there’s an art history graduate student sitting in Starbucks, laptop and venti decaf latte on hand, writing a thesis on the Whitney Biennial. It’s bound to be a history of arrant egos, frustrated reputations, political intrigue, curatorial missteps and temporary fame.<br />
<p class="text"><span>Part of the narrative will be an inventory of reviews. Given the negative and sometimes vitriolic criticism the Biennial has engendered over the years, it should be an entertaining and maybe hilarious roundup. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/alas-biennial-kinda-boring">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/alas-biennial-kinda-boring#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53702">Roe Etheridge</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53701">Whitney Biennial</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28111">Whitney Museum of American Art</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:59:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66250 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
