<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>At the Theater</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/blog/36033/%2A/feed</link>
 <description>Recent posts</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Herstory Repeats Itself with Caryl Churchill’s Classic Top Girls</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/herstory-repeats-itself-caryl-churchill-s-classic-top-girls</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>When we think of the British playwrights we’re most familiar with, one is a political conservative for the thinking classes (Sir Tom Stoppard), another a safe middlebrow socialist for the carriage trade (Sir David Hare), and another a working-class sentimentalist for Off Broadway (the un-knighted Mike Leigh).<br />
<p class="text"><span>Where does that leave Caryl Churchill—the unrepentant Marxist-feminist poet who’s for nothing less than social, political <em>and</em> theatrical revolution? In my view, she’s England’s greatest living playwright.</span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/herstory-repeats-itself-caryl-churchill-s-classic-top-girls">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/herstory-repeats-itself-caryl-churchill-s-classic-top-girls#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/37791">Caryl Churchill</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:47:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69128 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Roundabout&#039;s Icy Liaisons, With a Freeze-Dried Laura Linney</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/roundabout-s-icy-liaisons-freeze-dried-laura-linney</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>I disagree with the critics who feel that Laura Linney has been miscast as the infamous sexual predator the Marquise de Merteuil in <em>Les Liaisons Dangereuses</em>. Ms. Linney’s controversial performance in the erratic Roundabout revival is living very dangerously indeed. Its unyielding ice coldness is overstylized, riveting in both its originality and waywardness, and ultimately a self-negating mistake, like an experiment in the wrong venue. But which other actress on Broadway, I wonder, is as daring as Ms. Linney? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/roundabout-s-icy-liaisons-freeze-dried-laura-linney">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/roundabout-s-icy-liaisons-freeze-dried-laura-linney#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33473">Laura Linney</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:43:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68790 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nichols, Freeman Can&#039;t Make Country Girl Awake and Sing</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/nichols-freeman-can-t-make-country-girl-awake-and-sing</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>And so it’s back to the ’50s (<em>again</em>). “All plays are dated,” Harold Clurman wrote in steadfast support of Clifford Odets in 1970. “They are products of their time.” Yes; but everything depends on how much the dated-ness shows.<br />
<p class="text">In the current Broadway revival of Odets’econd to last play, <em>The Country Girl</em>, it shows too much. Odets himself described the play as superficial, and he is correct. Even Clurman, who first produced the revolutionary conscience plays of Odets in the 1930s when they worked together at the Group Theatre, conceded that <em>The Country Girl</em> is more about the actors in it than the play—or potboiler—itself.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/nichols-freeman-can-t-make-country-girl-awake-and-sing">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/nichols-freeman-can-t-make-country-girl-awake-and-sing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33969">Mike Nichols</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40780">Morgan Freeman</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:59:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68464 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Harvey Fierstein Makes Scrambled Eggs of A Catered Affair</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/harvey-fierstein-makes-scrambled-eggs-catered-affair</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>And so, back to the ’50s (again), with the consciously modest Broadway musical <em>A Catered Affair</em>.<br />
<p class="text"><span>Modesty doesn’t really suit Broadway; it implies “good taste,” discretion, refinement, art—Stephen Sondheim. The British director of <em>A Catered Affair</em>, John Doyle (of the recent minimalist Broadway revivals of Mr. Sondheim’s <em>Company</em> and <em>Sweeney Todd</em>), has treated what’s essentially a wheezing old potboiler as if it were a mini-opera. It’s a rare thing on Broadway in that sense: a tearjerker that induces no tears.</span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/harvey-fierstein-makes-scrambled-eggs-catered-affair">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/harvey-fierstein-makes-scrambled-eggs-catered-affair#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/44115">Harvey Fierstein</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:29:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68174 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Relief From Cornball Retro! Adding Machine Is a Calculated Triumph</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/relief-cornball-retro-adding-machine-calculated-triumph</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><span>It’s no secret that much of our theater is living nostalgically in the 1950s. Coming to a theater near you: <em>The Dancing Eisenhower Years</em>. And why not? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/relief-cornball-retro-adding-machine-calculated-triumph">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/relief-cornball-retro-adding-machine-calculated-triumph#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:24:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67839 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>South Pacific Reheats Blueberry Pie</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/south-pacific-reheats-blueberry-pie</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><span>Call me a cockeyed pessimist. While everyone else in the audience at Lincoln Center’s loving revival of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s 1949 <em>South Pacific</em> seemed to be in heaven, I thought I was in a retirement home.</span><br />
<p class="text"><span>Now, now … before I’m drummed out of town, let me say that the score is an unequalled romantic gem. But you know that. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/south-pacific-reheats-blueberry-pie">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/south-pacific-reheats-blueberry-pie#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/42332">South Pacific</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:09:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67538 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lupone and Laurents Make Gypsy Soar</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/lupone-and-laurents-make-gypsy-soar</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><span>Whether you’re seeing <em>Gypsy</em> for the first (or fourth or fifth) time, you’ll want to catch Arthur Laurents’ revival starring Patti LuPone at the St. James Theatre. For one thing, Gypsy is among the very best musicals ever written, and we assume that by now the 90-year-old Mr. Laurents—who created the masterly book in 1959, and is directing the show for the third time—knows what he’s doing. </span><br />
<p class="text"><span>He’s like a museum keeper with the only set of keys. When Sam Mendes directed the revisionist <em>Gypsy</em> with Bernadette Peters on Broadway five years ago, traditionalists took offense (including, reportedly, Mr. Laurents). Don’t mess with Mama Rose! (Or <em>else</em>.) <em>Gypsy</em>, the musical for people who hate their mothers, arouses intense feelings. </span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/lupone-and-laurents-make-gypsy-soar">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/lupone-and-laurents-make-gypsy-soar#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40094">Arthur Laurents</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32062">Patti LuPone</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 12:43:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67214 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Caryl Churchill’s 45-Minute Screed on Bush and Blair; Remembering the Great Paul Scofield</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/caryl-churchill-s-45-minute-screed-bush-and-blair-remembering-great-paul-scofield</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>You might want to think twice about seeing <em>Drunk Enough to Say I Love You?</em> at the Public Theatre. The radical politics of the distinguished feminist playwright aren’t giving me pause; it’s the $50 tickets that trouble me.<br />
<p class="text">I’m no mathematician, but by my reckoning, $50 for an evening lasting 45 minutes amounts to $3,852 a minute. If you ask me—and please do—that’s outrageous. It’s a <em>lot</em>. Facts don’t lie. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/caryl-churchill-s-45-minute-screed-bush-and-blair-remembering-great-paul-scofield">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/caryl-churchill-s-45-minute-screed-bush-and-blair-remembering-great-paul-scofield#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/37791">Caryl Churchill</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53936">Paul Scofield</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:59:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66892 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Slurry of Soapy Soft-Rock Musicals Clean Up Broadway</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/slurry-soapy-soft-rock-musicals-clean-broadway</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It’s a funny old job being a critic. Each week, I confidently—<em>fairly</em> confidently—offer a point of view about a show. Yet if someone asks me personally what show to see, I wish they wouldn’t.<br />
<p class="text">I don’t want to feel responsible if they have a horrible time. Only recently some friends of mine from out of town were planning a Broadway treat for the family and asked what I thought about <em>Spring Awakening</em>. I replied without thinking, “You’ll love it.” Because I did. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/slurry-soapy-soft-rock-musicals-clean-broadway">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/slurry-soapy-soft-rock-musicals-clean-broadway#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53844">In the Heights</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53845">Lin-Manuel Miranda</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:58:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66601 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lean on Me, Brick! Debbie Allen’s Cat Is Exuberant, Flawed, Feminine</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/lean-me-brick-debbie-allen-s-cat-exuberant-flawed-feminine</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It’s amazing that choreographer Debbie Allen’s starry Broadway production of <em>Cat on a Hot Tin Roof</em>—the first all-black version—can have so much plain wrong with it, yet still delight me. But consider this: No great playwright ever wrote so badly and so beautifully within the same play as Tennessee Williams (unless it was Eugene O’Neill).<br />
<p class="text">I love Williams in spite of his flaws and because of them. He’s our poet of tender mercies who put onstage the large, damaged hearts of the dispossessed. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/lean-me-brick-debbie-allen-s-cat-exuberant-flawed-feminine">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/lean-me-brick-debbie-allen-s-cat-exuberant-flawed-feminine#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52815">Theater</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/47263">Anika Noni Rose</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51570">Cat on a Hot Tin Roof</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51572">Debbie Allen</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32006">Tennessee Williams</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53706">Terrence Howard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:33:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Heilpern</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66258 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
