<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Upfronts 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/blog/54044/%2A/feed</link>
 <description>Recent posts</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Who Needs Good Shows? We&#039;re Fox!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/who-needs-good-shows-were-fox</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="western">Jack Bauer, the swashbuckling lead in <em>24</em>, had a mission for Peter Liguori, the president of Fox Entertainment: present Fox’s fall programming schedule to advertisers and the media in under an hour. “I’ve neutralized terrorists, I’ve taken down rogue agents, I’d take the world in less time than that. All you need to do is shorten your speech,” said Kiefer Sutherland, playing Mr. Bauer, in a pre-taped gag from the “24” set. “Lose the charts, keep it simple.”</p>
<p class="western">&nbsp; <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/who-needs-good-shows-were-fox">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/who-needs-good-shows-were-fox#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50073">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:45:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54239 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CW: Oh, You Handsome Devil</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/54237</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="western">What television network does Satan want you to spend your time watching? On Thursday May 17, around noon, the Prince of Darkness wandered onto stage at the Theater at Madison Square Garden and confirmed what theologians have long suspected. He wants you to watch the CW <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/54237">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/54237#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50072">The CW</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50032">Upfronts</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 08:22:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54237 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CBS in 2007: Vampire Chic, Horny Geeks, Casinos, Wife-Swapping</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/cbs-2007-vampire-chic-horny-geeks-casinos-wife-swapping</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Meet stewmurray47, the future of television! The network leader dosn't have a lot of room for new programming in its lineup, but it's doing what it can to keep up with the almost-universal television trends of 2007. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/cbs-2007-vampire-chic-horny-geeks-casinos-wife-swapping">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/cbs-2007-vampire-chic-horny-geeks-casinos-wife-swapping#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49800">CBS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/31441">Hugh Jackman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/44056">Jimmy Smits</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28749">Leslie Moonves</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50032">Upfronts</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 07:16:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Felix Gillette</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54214 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ABC: America&#039;s Song-and-Dance Network</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/abc-americas-song-and-dance-network</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>Ugly Betty’s</em> Mark Indelicato, decked out in a tux with a candy-apple red vest, lead a Broadway-like performance of &quot;One Singular Sensation,&quot; to open up ABC’s Upfront presentation yesterday afternoon. America Ferrera and the rest of the cast joined him, kicking up their heels in a chorus line. (We see a very special musical episode of <em>Ugly Betty</em> on the horizon.) <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/abc-americas-song-and-dance-network">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/abc-americas-song-and-dance-network#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24408">ABC Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50066">America Ferrara</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28127">Jimmy Kimmel</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 09:39:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54194 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ABC&#039;s Aggressive 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/abcs-aggressive-2007</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><span>This afternoon ABC presents its 2007-2008 schedule to media and ad reps at Lincoln Center; to get things started this morning, the network released the lineup to press.</span>

<a name="OLE_LINK2" title="OLE_LINK2"></a><span>“We’re heading into the new season with a strong lineup of returning shows that we’ve developed and nurtured over the past few years,”  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/abcs-aggressive-2007">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/abcs-aggressive-2007#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24408">ABC Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50032">Upfronts</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 09:31:36 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54069 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NBC at the Upfronts: &#039;Frankly, We Need To Be More Better&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/nbc-upfronts-frankly-we-need-be-more-better</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>“The buzz was loud and clear, we struck a chord,” said president of NBC Entertainment Kevin Reilly at the network’s Upfront presentation yesterday afternoon. But: “Frankly, we need to be more better.”<br />
<p class="MsoNormal">Mr. Reilly was saying what the hundreds of ad executives milling around Radio City for the first day of the Upfronts already knew. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/nbc-upfronts-frankly-we-need-be-more-better">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/nbc-upfronts-frankly-we-need-be-more-better#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32267">Jeff Zucker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30443">Jerry Seinfeld</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/48731">Kevin Reilly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50031">NBC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50032">Upfronts</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 07:15:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54062 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>NBC: &#039;We&#039;ve Got the Class, Here Comes the Mass&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/nbc-weve-got-class-here-comes-mass</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>This afternoon, NBC goes before advertisers and the press to try to sell its 2007-2008 season to advertisers and the press. So this morning the network sent out the details of the season for previewing by the masses.<br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&quot;We&#39;ve got the class and next season we&#39;re ready to add some mass,&quot; said</span><span> NBC Entertainment President Kevin Reilly,</span><span> &quot;with new  shows that build on the creative accomplishments of last season and are as broad  as they are good.&quot;</span></p>
<p>We take it &quot;mass&quot; means &quot;more viewers,&quot; because Mr. Reilly&#39;s statement suggests what we all know: the network that was willing to take risks with some edgy material over the last couple of seasons (and had a lot of success with the critics: <em>Friday Night Lights, Medium, Heroes</em>) still hasn&#39;t gotten a show in the top 10 in terms of viewers.</p>
<p>But then, why does this season seem so of a piece with the previous ones?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>Given that NBC only picked up one comedy and renewed <em>Scrubs,</em> it looks like comedy development, once a Must-See TV staple, is in trouble (though that&#39;s true everywhere).</span></p>
<p><em><span></span></em><span><em>Chuck</em> sounds cute and funny, and </span><span><em>Lipstick Jungle</em> is a no-brainer even if working-women dramedys are a tough sell on television these days (how to avoid both cliché and dirtiness in a show like this?)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">But w<span>ith <em>Journeyman,</em> it sounds like they are ripping off  their own <em>Heroes</em>, taking the Masi Oka character (who time travels) and  building a show on that. People love the supernatural these days! </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>If <em>Bionic Woman</em> is a success we&#39;ll be seeing these woman-superhero shows all over the place on the small screen. Get Linda Carter!  </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>And the <em>IT Crowd</em>–about the eccentrics who fix your computer and what life is like in the room next to the supply room--hello, <em>Office</em>?</span></p>
<p><span></span><span><em>Life,</em> we assume, is made  possible by the banishment of <em>Law and Order: Criminal Intent</em> to  USA. They needed another quirky  detective, but maybe not one with quite such an annoying speech pattern.</span><br />
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The burning question: Why  won’t NBC ever cancel <em>ER</em>? (And why do people continue to watch it?)  </span></p>
<p>Click &quot;READ MORE&quot; to read the full announcement. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/nbc-weve-got-class-here-comes-mass">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/nbc-weve-got-class-here-comes-mass#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50031">NBC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50032">Upfronts</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 12:39:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54046 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
