Greg Fischer (not verified) says:

You say "... Kavanagh is for REFORM"? Are you on crack?

First, Kavanagh is a slick talking, pandering, carpetbagger that has no roots in THAT district. He just moved it because Sylvia is a weak link.

Second, like Mark Twain said "If you don't read the paper you are uninformed and if you do read the paper you are misinformed!"

The Times did not bother to contact, or even review, all of the candidates. The lifelong resident of the district that IS running was never contacted by The Times in any way.... that candidate is Juan Pagan.

So much for the endorsement, IT WAS BIASED!

The Times is not the perfect ORACLE of wisdom ... it is just maybe best we have in New York City political media. Sometimes it prints pure crap!

In truth Kavanagh is just another "go along", uninspired putz, in an empty suit that wants the power but has no real higher purpose or commitment to the people. He raised a lot of money and now he is using it to BRAINWASH the masses. (You might ask, who does he have to payback for all if that money?)

I KNOW THAT KAVANAUGH IS USELESS, REALLY USELESS! I talked to him. I lobbied him on children's and family issues. I got pandered by him. Frankly, he makes me sick.

If you want to vote YOUR heart and your mind ---- talk to Juan Pagan then make up your own mind about who is best for the job.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.