Billi (not verified) says:

I agree with this review completely - though I would be harsher :D Having read and loved the first six books, I'll never get why Harry was pointlessly meandering around the forest - it accomplishes nothing, and anything he does manage to do is a) sheer luck (like Bellatrix slipping up and TELLING him where one of the horcruxes is - Voldemort telling him where one is just by thinking to himself - THAT is priceless) b) when Hermione does it for him. Why this book should have been called Hermione Granger and the passive-Boy-who-tried-to-die-and-failed-at-that-too...

There is no consistency and no logic in most of the pivotal points, and in the end, Harry uses Unforgiveables, and instead of defeating Voldemort with the Power-Dark-Lord-Knew-Not he defeats the greatest wizard of all time on a technicality.

There is no character growth. There is, however, character assasination and transplants, where familiar people, for no reason that one can see, suddenly behave differently. And making a book 'adult' does not constitute any great skill on her part - you can almost see her mentally tick off a list: Book 1 - keep childish; Book 2 - introduce racism; Book 3 - murder and betrayal! Book 4 - hormones and slavery; Book 5 - mind control; Book 6 - ultimate evil posing as horcruxes; Book 7 - random deaths of random characters.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.