Obama was desperate last week? Right. Dream On in your Spin Delusions.
1. Clinton attacked his position in the debate, and then she attacked him personally the next day (naive and irresponsible).
2. When he turned that back on her on a dime, and added the absolutely trenchant "Bush-lite" term. It summarizes her foreign policy perfectly, especially now that she has turned against her previous support for urgent top-level diplomacy.
Clinton is playing politics with our foreign policy again, just like she did when she voted to support Bush in 2002-2003, and to stay the course in 2004.
Senator Byrd and others had plenty enough information to make a rational decision to oppose the war. Only irresponsible political maneuvering caused Clinton to support it.
3. When things started getting really hot, she pulled a victim stunt to change the subject and put the spotlight on herself by unbuttoning her blouse and intentionally setting off a frivolous firestorm by making sure the Washington Post started analyzed the "issue."
Cheap political tricks, left and right.
Despite her enormous intelligence, that's what another Clinton presidency will bring. In the good-times 90's they were vastly more innocuous. In our much more serious times, they will lead us on to further tragedy.
This man is the Pollster. We need a leader who can look beyond the polls, whose positions arise from his or her conscience and his or her judgment. Unfortunately, this pollster has the Clintons in his thrall.
Obama was desperate last week? Right. Dream On in your Spin Delusions.
1. Clinton attacked his position in the debate, and then she attacked him personally the next day (naive and irresponsible).
2. When he turned that back on her on a dime, and added the absolutely trenchant "Bush-lite" term. It summarizes her foreign policy perfectly, especially now that she has turned against her previous support for urgent top-level diplomacy.
Clinton is playing politics with our foreign policy again, just like she did when she voted to support Bush in 2002-2003, and to stay the course in 2004.
Senator Byrd and others had plenty enough information to make a rational decision to oppose the war. Only irresponsible political maneuvering caused Clinton to support it.
3. When things started getting really hot, she pulled a victim stunt to change the subject and put the spotlight on herself by unbuttoning her blouse and intentionally setting off a frivolous firestorm by making sure the Washington Post started analyzed the "issue."
Cheap political tricks, left and right.
Despite her enormous intelligence, that's what another Clinton presidency will bring. In the good-times 90's they were vastly more innocuous. In our much more serious times, they will lead us on to further tragedy.
This man is the Pollster. We need a leader who can look beyond the polls, whose positions arise from his or her conscience and his or her judgment. Unfortunately, this pollster has the Clintons in his thrall.
Happily, American has a better option.