missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Jonathan Judge (not verified) says:

See, this is all the more reason why non-elected proponents of congestion pricing shouldn’t support it.

The man who’s been this congestion tax’s biggest cheerleader uses two massive gas-and-ethanol guzzling SUVs just to drive to a subway station in Manhattan, and not even the nearest one! Clearly, deep down, this tax is not an environmental issue for him at all.

In fact, it always has been and will continue to be about the money, $30 billion by 2030 to be exact. If it were all really about the environment, he would be walking to the nearest subway station with a security detail on foot.

So, before all of our elected reps are strong-armed and/or tickled with glee over the thoughts of billions of new taxpayer dollars to play around with, we need to tell them no to this massive tax increase.

If you want to speak out against this tax and the hypocrisy, disingenuous arguments, and the ever-expanding Big Government qualities behind it, visit StopNYCCongestionTax.org and tell your reps today!

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.