Media

Lipman’s Legions Leery in Portfolio’s Second Sortie

Leaner, better magazine—but firings, resignations and charges of indecision at the top have some staffers sounding mutinous

This article was published in the August 20, 2007, edition of The New York Observer.

Tough and determined: Joanne Lipman.
Conde Nast
Tough and determined: Joanne Lipman.

When Portfolio editor in chief Joanne Lipman fired deputy Jim Impoco on the morning of August 7, a week before the magazine’s long-awaited second issue hit newsstands, the conversation about the fledgling Condé Nast business magazine shifted once again from its contents—were they really gonna say that about George Steinbrenner?—to the perception that chaos is reigning in the magazine’s 4 Times Square offices.

And inside those offices, Ms. Lipman is taking a lot of the blame.

“The second issue—and whole magazine—would be much smarter and more successful if Mr. Impoco was in charge,” said one Portfolio staffer. “Instead of being fired, he should have been named editor in chief.”

This issue is an improvement over the last one, from a reader’s point of view if not from that of Si Newhouse, who collected 63 pages less in ad revenue from issue No. 2.

To showcase Daniel Roth’s feature on the takeover of Chrysler, there’s a striking photograph of a car assembly line, complete with prodding robots the color of traffic cones. It’s a more ambitious aesthetic choice than a cover at say, Fortune, where Mr. Roth previously worked. And again, it’s that rare cover choice Portfolio exhibited with its first issue—it’s not a portrait of a person.

But as with the first issue, the cover decision came fairly late in the production cycle. Three sources at the magazine told The Observer that Mr. Roth’s 5,800-word piece was not even slated to be in the September issue, and would not have been included if the lately departed Mr. Impoco hadn’t pushed for it.

Also, the staffers said that Ms. Lipman had planned to hold the issue’s second-most prominently featured piece—the much-discussed article by Franz Lidz on George Steinbrenner’s declining health, which included rare access to the Yankees boss in Howard Hughes-like reclusion.

Instead, staffers said, Ms. Lipman was pushing for a cover story about a new business venture launched by followers of the Reverend Sun Myung Moon.

That piece has been shelved until October, said two staffers.

Ms. Lipman would only respond to questions by e-mailing a statement, which presented the Roth piece as an example of the depth of reporting possible on a monthly schedule; and the Lidz piece, which she said demonstrated the value of releasing a story on the Internet before the magazine hit newsstands. Portfolio spokesperson Perri Dorset told The Observer that the Steinbrenner and Chrysler stories were “scheduled for the September issue from the beginning.”

Another staffer said that there is “some revisionism going on” among Mr. Impoco’s partisans about his role in the development of the second issue.

Many who work for Ms. Lipman call her tough and determined. But even those who support her inside the magazine characterize her learning curve at a monthly glossy as steep, and often treacherous. This is the first magazine venture for Ms. Lipman, a newspaper veteran who worked 22 years at The Wall Street Journal. And three sources at the magazine said that Ms. Lipman doesn’t generally read them.

At one meeting, when The Atlantic’s James Fallows was suggested as a writer for a story, two staffers said Ms. Lipman asked for some clips from the five-time National Magazine Award finalist. The two both also confirmed reports that Ms. Lipman is fond of saying her ideal writer at Portfolio would be James Patterson—the advertising executive-turned-best-selling crime novelist. Next Page >

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

fang (not verified) says:

Given the fact that BOTH newspapers and magazines are going through a shakeout as they respond to the newly-savvy audience out there, it would seem the charitable thing for The Observer to focus less on what MAY be wrong with PORTFOLIO and feature all that is right - the fact that a new magazine of import has emerges in these turbulent media waters. I realize your job is not to be cheeleaders, but perhaps you may consider "praising Caesar" instead of "burying him!"

JazzHands (not verified) says:

Impoco was badmouthing Lipman all over town. It was childish and inappropriate and certainly NOT the way to become editor-in-chief. Not exactly a sign that he would be a great leader. Lipman should never hired him in the first place and should have fired him before he became a public embarrassment. I wouldn't be surprised if 99% of the "pro Impoco" camp's commentary comes directly from him.

Bad Timing (not verified) says:

Portfolio suffers from terrible timing, and it may prove fatal. It was a great idea to start a glossy business magazine about a year or two ago. Hedge fund geniuses ruled the world, the stock market was boring, business news had lost its punch, it made sense to inject an artful, energetic voice into the mix. Think of all the billionaires you could profile, all the beautiful mansions, the private jets, the CHARACTERS, the Gatsby glory of it all.

But then the sub-prime meltdown happened, followed by a credit squeeze that revealed the hedge fund guys are not really geniuses after all, and now business news is minute-to-minute again, dominated daily by the final 30 minutes of NYSE trading, CNBC, the internet, rising consumer anger, looming recession, the daily testing of Bernanke's mettle and intellect, and whatever mortgage lender is going out of business today. There is no room in that conversation for a once-a-month voice, let alone a voice dripping with that peculiar Manhattan-centric view of wealth and money.

Portfolio is like a beatiful, state-of-the-art housing development just opening its doors. Granite, mahogany, Sub-zero, etc. -- it doesn't matter, it's SO 2006.

Larry Dietz (not verified) says:

Magazine start-ups are often fraught (editors/writers egos and ambition, a volatile mixture, in massive proportions). I was there at the beginning of New York, in 1968, and remember well the summer '68 crisis when some writers pushed Clay Felker to get rid of Tom Wolfe and other stars, and I was a participant in the New West internicine warfare of 1976-7.

"Bad timing" thinks Portfolio will fail because business markets are now in upheaval. Well, Fortune came out in the depths of the Great Depression, and managed to make it.

Oh, and second issues almost always have fewer ad pages than first issues. They're often "better", since there's generally too much riding on the first issue (editors trying to find "perfect" pieces that will "be" the magazine). Besides, once writers start to see what they're writing for, they get inspired by the magazine (best examples, Esquire in the 1960's, Harper's under Willie Morris in the late 1960's and early 1970's).

vampireslayer (not verified) says:

Nice photo. "Joanne? I have a Mr. Nosferatu on line one...he wants his hands back."

strongorbit (not verified) says:

Fang--or is it David Carey? Cmon, man. The very notion of long-form business journalism is an oxymoron. This was a bad idea from day one, and no one up there (except Impoco) had an inkling. It was all--Vanity Fair meets Fortune. But really, dears, what did you expect from the maker of the WSJ's Personal Journal section, where the cutting edge concept was daddy's wine cellar and new aerobeds?

Folks: contrary to the conventional wisdom, the WSJ's editorial (not the editorial pages) has been asleep for a long long time--and The Lip was responsible for some of the most retardataire moves there. Hiring her for this gig is like hiring Peter Beinart to run Vanity Fair. Well, bad analogy, but you get the picture...

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Nice...

wow gold (not verified) says:
wow gold (not verified) says:

cool...

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.