Joe Conason (not verified) says:

Actually, I have lots of statistics to back up my assertions -- and they can most easily be found in the Media Matters study that I reference in the column. In fact, the link is above. I realize that at least some of the conservatives complaining about my argument can't get past the headline, but I love their comments anyway. Annoying them always makes me laugh.
My suggestion that the Economist editors are more persuasive because they used to predict permanent Republican hegemony was not meant as a testimonial to their accuracy -- only that they seem to have learned something from their mistakes...

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.