missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Cranky Independent (not verified) says:

(I don't know about unionized public employees but I do know that non-unionized public employees and retirees are paying more and more for less and less.)

So is the city. And you have to ask why.

It may be the escalating share of national income spent on health care is worth it. But we can't be sure, because it isn't our choice. Money is seized, and turned over to the health care industry, and we are then able to take as much as we want for "free." Others pay taxes and get nothing.

If the same government money was spent on basic health care for all -- say the health care that was available five years ago -- and people and chartiies made up their own mind about the rest, you'd have equity and cost control.

But people would have to give up direct and indirect (tax breaks) government funding for luxury/ineffective/cutting edge care.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.