missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Andy (not verified) says:
I sure hope Dan has something on CBS that's worth the defamation he did to himself with the stipulation in his lawsuit. Among them:
* He admits to demanding a maximum amount of airtime on CBS in his last contract for nothing more than his own career vanity, even though he knew he wouldn't be able to be fully involved in his reporting.
* Despite claiming that the corporation feared him as a maverick reporter, he also admits to completely rolling over for the company... saying whatever they wanted him to say and shutting up when they demanded it.
* Dan indicates that he, in effect, accepted what he felt to be a completely unfair and biased report even though it destroyed the careers of close colleagues; he only changed course when CBS didn't subsequently give him the airtime to which he felt entitled.
How could anything CBS does make him look any worse than what's in his own lawsuit?
I sure hope Dan has something on CBS that's worth the defamation he did to himself with the stipulation in his lawsuit. Among them:
* He admits to demanding a maximum amount of airtime on CBS in his last contract for nothing more than his own career vanity, even though he knew he wouldn't be able to be fully involved in his reporting.
* Despite claiming that the corporation feared him as a maverick reporter, he also admits to completely rolling over for the company... saying whatever they wanted him to say and shutting up when they demanded it.
* Dan indicates that he, in effect, accepted what he felt to be a completely unfair and biased report even though it destroyed the careers of close colleagues; he only changed course when CBS didn't subsequently give him the airtime to which he felt entitled.
How could anything CBS does make him look any worse than what's in his own lawsuit?