DEP (not verified) says:

I am familiar with the DEP's position in this case and the violation was not withheld, it was dismissed, and the DEP has no intention of issuing another violation as further testing has proved that the "positive" tests were incorrect and there is no asbestos in the ceiling. I know this will be disappointing to the tenants and politicians who are looking for a pay-day, but this is our position.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.