I have told this before, I will tell it yet again. One of the documents which the MSM said was falsified because it contained subscript and superscript and that would not have been available at the time of the document could very well have been valid. The MSM was incorrect. Said document concerned a time when bush was supposedly at an AF base in Alabama. It just so happens I was in charge of such a device at exactly the same time as the supposedly false document was printed and the device was at another military base not 50 miles from the one involved.
I have told this before, I will tell it yet again. One of the documents which the MSM said was falsified because it contained subscript and superscript and that would not have been available at the time of the document could very well have been valid. The MSM was incorrect. Said document concerned a time when bush was supposedly at an AF base in Alabama. It just so happens I was in charge of such a device at exactly the same time as the supposedly false document was printed and the device was at another military base not 50 miles from the one involved.