missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Watcher (not verified) says:

This isn't a bad review, but the reviewer really didn't get the film. My sense is that he's overwriting; trying to draw on the essential coolness of this film but failing miserably.

In addition to the points made above, the review mischaracterizes what the husband does. He is in a marriage he doesn't want to be in, and freaks out - but he doesn't exactly make a "testosterone" driven pass at Juno.

I hate to be critical, but Observer, please think of getting a new film critic. This review is a shame for this newspaper.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.