I agree with Laon's comment, above. The only thing I can determine from the article is that it is written by this "lit chick hot" New Yorker fact-checker who would know all his books by heeart and who has been stalking Rushdie! Listen to her lament: "He is not, it would seem, much interested in linking up with, say, a “lit chick hot” New Yorker fact-checker who would know all his books by heart and be his Dries van Noten-clad concubine. No, he wanted a dishy ditz. (And if you think that will only make him even more attractive to those bookish babes, you’d be right.)" Doree, get over him! He is a great writer indeed, but still not worth it!