I remember when the NYT was a respected publication. Sulzberger and Keller have pretty much run the paper into the ground. If I am an advertiser and learn about garbage like the Vicky Iseman fabrication by the Times, I pull my ads.
Plenty of advertisers and readers alike have come to see the Times for what it has now become - an editorially biased paper with questionable verification practices for its reporting staff.
Both USA Today and the Wall Street Journal have circulations far higher than the Times. The Times, if it is not careful, will descend to the depths of where the Weekly World News is now.
It has become obvious that advertisers and readers alike have now flatly rejected the Times' definition of what quality reporting is supposed to be.
I remember when the NYT was a respected publication. Sulzberger and Keller have pretty much run the paper into the ground. If I am an advertiser and learn about garbage like the Vicky Iseman fabrication by the Times, I pull my ads.
Plenty of advertisers and readers alike have come to see the Times for what it has now become - an editorially biased paper with questionable verification practices for its reporting staff.
Both USA Today and the Wall Street Journal have circulations far higher than the Times. The Times, if it is not careful, will descend to the depths of where the Weekly World News is now.
It has become obvious that advertisers and readers alike have now flatly rejected the Times' definition of what quality reporting is supposed to be.