I am very dissapointed in this one sided piece projecting Mitt Romney as a calculated robot. Maybe Mitt has changed his beliefs albeit from pro-choice to pro-life but that doesn't make him any less sincere than this article is. Least ye forget, Ronald Reagan changed his position from pro-choice to pro-life as did Bush 41st. Also, Reagan changed politically parties after realizing that "I didn't leave the Democratic party, it left me." If the National Review endorsed Mitt than obviously he has some very good qualities that give us conservatives hope for in the upcoming election. I would be more to say that his religion is more of a factor than his so-called flip flops.