Key (not verified) says:

Both Rudy and Mitt had tough questions, but Mitt filibustered (giving long answers to short questions) while Rudy answered the question with a long (if necessary) awesome one. For example, Rudy's answer on why he left the Iraq Study Group, or why he did consulting with Qatar were awesome.

Ann Althouse and National Review gave high marks to Mitt vs. Rudy on Meet the Press, but it just shows they've already made up their mind, don't want to admit the truth, or are stupid.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.